Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogue in institutional settings
Edited by Franca Orletti and Letizia Caronia
[Language and Dialogue 9:1] 2019
► pp. 28–41

Why Trump won the elections

Populism and dialogue in the age of social media

 | University of Bologna (Italy)
In this article I would like to focus on the dialogical transformations that the use of social media has introduced into political discourse, showing why they have an increasing relevance on the whole landscape of our contemporary political arena. In order to do that, I will analyse their semiotic functioning, and the way in which they have transformed the traditional dialogical structure, still present in other forms of technologically mediated communication. Finally, I will advance some hypothesis on how these transformations can favour the growth of populism, a phenomenon that should concern anybody interested in dialogue, since populism represents precisely the death of any form of dialogue.
Keywords: social media, Internet, Digital Age, populism, political discourse, technologically mediated dialogue, communication
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Social media and digital mediated dialogue
  • 3.The digital revolution and its criticisms
  • 4.Turning to social media
  • 5.Back to Donald
  • 6.A tentative conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Sources
Published online: 5 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00030.vio
References (15)
References
Eco, Umberto. 1964. Apocalittici e integrati. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Fuller, Matthew and Goffey, Andrew. 2009. “Evil Media Studies”. In The Spam Book, ed. by Jussi Parikka and Tony Sampson, 141–159. New Jersey: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. Evil Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grusin, Richard. 2010. Premediation: Affect and Mediality After 9/11. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Donald Trump’s Evil Mediation”, Theory & Event 20(1): 86–99.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. 2015. Reclaiming conversation. The power of a Talk in a Digital Age. NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Violi, Patrizia. 1985. “Letters”. In Discourse and Literature. New Approaches to the Analysis of Literary genres, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 149–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “Electronic Dialogue Between Orality and Literacy. A Semiotic Approach.” In Dialoganalyse VI. Proceedings of the 6th Conference, ed. by Světla Čmejrková, Jana Hoffmannová, Olga Müllerová and Jindra Světlá, 263–270. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Identità e memoria nell’epoca di Google.” In Nella rete di Google. Pratiche, strategie e dispositivi del motore di ricerca che ha cambiato la nostra vita, ed. by Vincenza Del Marco and Isabella Pezzini, 195–216. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Sources
Elezioni politiche, 2006, [URL], broadcast video, last visit on August 31, 2018.
George Lafoff. 2016. How you help Trump: [URL], blog post, last visit on December 18, 2018.
George Lakoff. 2016. Understanding Trump: [URL], blog post, last visit on December 18, 2018.
Rai Tre. 1996. Silvio e Prodi da Annunziata: [URL], broadcast video, last visit on December 18, 2018.
Rai Uno. 2006. Silvio Berlusconi – Il ribaltamento della realtà, [URL], broadcast video, last visit on December 18, 2018.
NBC News. 2016. The First Presidential Debate: Hillary Clinton And Donald Trump (Full Debate), [URL], broadcast video, last visit on December 18, 2018.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kayam, Orly
2023. Trump’s Rhetorical Way to Presidency. In U.S. Democracy in Danger [Springer Studies on Populism, Identity Politics and Social Justice, ], ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.