Article published in:
Dialogue in institutional settings
Edited by Franca Orletti and Letizia Caronia
[Language and Dialogue 9:1] 2019
► pp. 6583
References

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986Speech Genres and Other Late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Best, Arthur, Deborah Zalense, Kathleeen Bridges and Kathryn Chenoweth
1993 “Peace, wealth, happiness and small claim courts: A case study.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 21 (2): 343–379.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conley, John M. and William M. O’Barr
1990Rules versus Relationships. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Robert T. and Karen Tracy
1995 “Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion.” Communication Theory 5: 248–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Building grounded practical theory in applied communication research: Introduction to the special issue.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 42 (3): 229–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patrick and Susan S. Silbey
1998The Commonplace of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garzone, Giuliana E.
2015 “Genre analysis.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie and Todd L. Sandel, 677–693. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goerdt, John A.
1992Small Claims and Traffic Court: Case Management Procedures, Case characteristics, and Outcomes in 12 Urban Districts. Williamsburg, VA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hafner, Christoph A.
2010 “A multiperspective genre analysis of the barrister’s opinion: Writing context, generic structure, and textualization.” Written Communication 27 (4): 410–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Zhengrui
2011 “The discursive construction of civil judgments in Mainland China.” Discourse and Society 22 (6): 743–765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Livermore, Michael A., Allen B. Riddell and Daniel N. Rockmore
2017 “The Supreme Court and the judicial genre.” Arizona Law Review 59: 837–901.Google Scholar
Rohl, Klaus F.
1990 “Small claims in civil court proceedings in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In Small Claims Courts, ed. by Christopher J. Whelan, 167–181. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruhnka, John C. and Steven Weller
1978Small Claims Courts: A National Examination. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
[ p. 83 ]
Steele, Eric H.
1981 “The historical context of small claims courts.” Law and Social Inquiry 6 (2): 293–376. Retrieved from https://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/828089
The Small Claims Study Group
1972Little Injustices: Small Claims and the American Consumer. Washington, DC: Center for Auto Safety.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen and Mary Caron
2017 “How the language style of small claims judges does ideological work.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36 (3): 321–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen and Danielle Hodge
2018 “Judge discourse moves that enact and endanger procedural justice.” Discourse and Society 29 (1): 63–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R.
1988 “What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures.” Law and Society Review 22 (1): 103–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Procedural justice and the courts.” Court Review 44(1/2): 26–31. Retrieved from http://​aja​.ncsc​.dni​.us​/publications​/courtrv​/cr44​-1​/CR44​-1​-2Tyler​.pdf
Weller, Steven, John C. Ruhnka and John A. Martin
1990 “American small claims courts.” In Small Claims Courts, ed. by Christopher J. Whelan, 5–23. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tracy, Karen
2020.  In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311],  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.