Review published in:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 10:2 (2020) ► pp. 290–295

Review of Tsakona & Chovanec (2018): The Dynamics of Interactional Humor. Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters

| University of Bucharest, Romania
Published online: 04 September 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00070.con
References

[ p. 295 ]References

Attardo, Salvatore
1994 Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001 Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by Vern W. McGee. Edited by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan and Isabel Ermida
(eds.) 2012 Language and Humour in the Media. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan and Marta Dynel
2015 “Researching Interactional Forms and Participants Structures in Public and Social Media.” In Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec (eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, 1–23. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shifman, Limor
2013 “Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling with a Conceptual Troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (3): 362–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy
2009 “Language and Image Interaction in Cartoons: Towards a Multimodal Theory of Humour.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (6): 1171–1188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy and Diana Elena Popa
eds. 2011 Studies in Political Humour: In between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winchatz, Michaela R. and Alexander Kozin
2008 “Comical Hypothetical. Arguing for a Conversational Phenomenon.” Discourse Studies 10 (3): 383–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar