Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogic Matters: Interrelating Dialogue, the Material, and Social Change
Edited by Theresa Castor
[Language and Dialogue 11:1] 2021
► pp. 59–82

Self-representation of people with disabilities

“Disabling” the audience, challenging aesthetic norms and employing ironic echoing

| David Yellin College of Education , Israel
This paper examines the contribution of multimodal strategies in challenging aspects of public discourse about people with disabilities. It looks into media texts that were created by people with disabilities, in which the topic of disability is not a metaphor or a narrative prosthesis, but a demand for recognition and a call for a sincere dialogue, using three complementary strategies: disabling the viewers, challenging dominant aesthetic norms, and ironic echoing. The paper focuses on two autobiographical videos, a promotional video, a small corpus of paintings and a photograph, in which ironic echoing is the dominant strategy.
Keywords: people with disabilities, multimodality, ironic echoing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Disability: Conceptualization, models and media representation
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Representations of disabled individuals in the media
  • 5.A reversal of perspective and posing a demand to the audience
    • 5.1Disabling the audience: Undermining the reliability of the senses
    • 5.2Challenging aesthetic norms
    • 5.3Ironic echoing
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00084.koh
References (45)
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000. “Irony and relevant inappropriateness.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartal, Ory. 2013. “The story of a Japanese advertisement: An integrative methodology for the study of image in advertising.” In Protocollage 13: Writing the Visual – Methodologies in Visual Culture Research, ed. by Dana Arieli-Horowitz, Ori Bartal and Naomi Meiri-Dan, 134–158. Tel Aviv: Resling and the Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, Jerusalem [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Barnes, Colin. 1994. Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination. Hurst. London.Google Scholar
Breuer, Nili. 2007. “Falling between the chairs: Narratives of exclusion and by the excluded.” Theory and Criticism 301: 230–25 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Colin. 2017. “Whose problem? Disability narratives and available identities.” In Community Planning and Development: Issues and Opportunities. Critical Concepts in Built Environment, 31. Routledge.Google Scholar
Charlton, James. 1998. Nothing About Us Without Us. University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darke, Paul. 2004. “The changing face of representations of disability in the media.” In Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments, ed. by John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes, and Carol Thomas, 100–105. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2010. History of Beauty. Trans. Uriel, Aryeh. Or Yehuda: Dvir [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Ellis, Katie M. 2014. “Cripples, bastards and broken things: Disability in Games of Thrones.” Journal of Media And Culture 17(5). [URL]. DOI logo
Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gruengard, Iddo. 2017. Creating out of disability and researching in light of the political. Lecture given (June 7, 2017) at series of researcher conferences at the Center for Disability Studies, School of Social Work and Social Welfare, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical discourse analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analyzing Discourse. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Ariel. 2008. “One leg here one leg there”: Global and local identity in Israeli clips. PhD thesis, Tel Aviv University, Israel [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Friedman-Papo, Ariel. 2001. Clips, Television, and Restless Youth. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education Curricula Department and Maalot Publishers [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2002. “The politics of staring: Visual rhetorics of disability in popular photography.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, ed. by Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, 56–75. New York: The Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Heinze, Ulrich. 2014. “Pictorial body metaphors.” Language and Dialogue 4(3): 425–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holler, Roni. 2014. “People with disabilities and the Israeli welfare state: The case of relief work.” Social Security Journal 951: 39–76 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Kama, Amit. 2015. “Wounding images: The representation of people with disabilities in the media.” In From Exclusion to Inclusion: Life in a Community of Disabled People in Israel, ed. by Dror Hovav, Mordechai Duvdevani and Clara Feldman, 181–213. Jerusalem: Carmel.Google Scholar
Kasnitz, Devva and Russel P. Shuttleworth. 2001. “Anthropology and disability studies.” In Semiotics and Dis/ability: Interrogating Categories of Difference, ed. by Linda J. Rogers and Beth Blue Swadener Albany, 19–42. NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Linton, Simi. 1998. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Masefield, Paddy. 2006. Strength: Broadsides from Disability on the Arts. Trentham. Stoke-on-Trent.Google Scholar
Meiri-Dan, Naomi. 2009. “The torso in art – Between a long-lost world and a world entire.” The Bezalel History & Theory Department 12: Time between Science and Art, [URL] [Hebrew].
Mitchell, David T. and Sharon L. Snyder. 2000. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. “Bodies in action.” Language and Dialogue 4(3): 357–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mor, Sagit, Neta Ziv, Arlene Kanter, Adva Eichengreen, Nissim and Mizrachi (ed. 2016. Disability Studies: A Reader. Jerusalem: The Van Leer Institute and Hakkibutz Hameuchad [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinney, Christopher. 2004. Photos of the Gods: The Printed Image and Political Struggle in India. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to researching with Visual Materials. 4th edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rothler, Roni and Ronen Gil. 2010. “On the spectrum and beyond it: Representation of people with autism – difference, abilities, rights and everything in between.” Law & Social Change 31:83–101 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Saar, Tsafi. 2012. “Is disability actually a gender?” Haaretz June 12, 2012 [URL] (accessed May 29, 2017) [Hebrew].
Scotch, Richard K., and Kay Schriner. 1997. “Disability as human variation: Implications for policy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 5491: 148–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom and Nicholas Watson. 2002. “The social model of disability: An outdated ideology?” Research in Social Science and Disability 21: 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Brett. 2014. “Dialogism, Monologism, and Boundaries: Some Possibilities for Disability Studies and Interdisciplinary Research.” Review of Disabilities Studies 6 (3): 25–33.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deidre Wilson. 1981. “Irony and the use-mention distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole. New York: American Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sturken, Marita and Lisa Cartwright. 2009. Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, John and Sally French. 2000. “Towards an affirmation model of disability.” Disability & Society 15(4): 569–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamari, Tomoko. 2017. “Body image and prosthetic aesthetics: Disability, technology and Paralympic culture.” Body & Society 231: 2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2015. “Identity as a dialogic concept.” Language and Dialogue 5(1): 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Ggame. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, Jeanne. 2000. Susan Laughs. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Wolf, Janet. 1993. The Social Production of Art. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Castor, Theresa R.
2021. Dialogic matters. Language and Dialogue 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.