Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogic Matters: Interrelating Dialogue, the Material, and Social Change
Edited by Theresa Castor
[Language and Dialogue 11:1] 2021
► pp. 59–82

Self-representation of people with disabilities

“Disabling” the audience, challenging aesthetic norms and employing ironic echoing

| David Yellin College of Education , Israel

This paper examines the contribution of multimodal strategies in challenging aspects of public discourse about people with disabilities. It looks into media texts that were created by people with disabilities, in which the topic of disability is not a metaphor or a narrative prosthesis, but a demand for recognition and a call for a sincere dialogue, using three complementary strategies: disabling the viewers, challenging dominant aesthetic norms, and ironic echoing. The paper focuses on two autobiographical videos, a promotional video, a small corpus of paintings and a photograph, in which ironic echoing is the dominant strategy.

Keywords: people with disabilities, multimodality, ironic echoing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Disability: Conceptualization, models and media representation
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Representations of disabled individuals in the media
  • 5.A reversal of perspective and posing a demand to the audience
    • 5.1Disabling the audience: Undermining the reliability of the senses
    • 5.2Challenging aesthetic norms
    • 5.3Ironic echoing
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00084.koh
References (45)
Attardo, Salvatore
2000 “Irony and relevant inappropriateness.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartal, Ory
2013 “The story of a Japanese advertisement: An integrative methodology for the study of image in advertising.” In Protocollage 13: Writing the Visual – Methodologies in Visual Culture Research, ed. by Dana Arieli-Horowitz, Ori Bartal and Naomi Meiri-Dan, 134–158. Tel Aviv: Resling and the Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, Jerusalem [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Barnes, Colin
1994 Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination. Hurst. London.Google Scholar
Breuer, Nili
2007 “Falling between the chairs: Narratives of exclusion and by the excluded.” Theory and Criticism 301: 230–25 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Butler, Judith
1990 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Colin
2017 “Whose problem? Disability narratives and available identities.” In Community Planning and Development: Issues and Opportunities. Critical Concepts in Built Environment, 31. Routledge.Google Scholar
Charlton, James
1998 Nothing About Us Without Us. University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darke, Paul
2004 “The changing face of representations of disability in the media.” In Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments, ed. by John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes, and Carol Thomas, 100–105. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
2010 History of Beauty. Trans. Uriel, Aryeh. Or Yehuda: Dvir [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Ellis, Katie M.
2014 “Cripples, bastards and broken things: Disability in Games of Thrones.” Journal of Media And Culture 17(5). [URL]. DOI logo
Goffman, Erving
1971 Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gruengard, Iddo
2017 Creating out of disability and researching in light of the political. Lecture given (June 7 2017) at series of researcher conferences at the Center for Disability Studies, School of Social Work and Social Welfare, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical discourse analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2003 Analyzing Discourse. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Ariel
2008 “One leg here one leg there”: Global and local identity in Israeli clips. PhD thesis, Tel Aviv University, Israel [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Friedman-Papo, Ariel
2001 Clips, Television, and Restless Youth. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education Curricula Department and Maalot Publishers [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie
2002 “The politics of staring: Visual rhetorics of disability in popular photography.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, ed. by Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, 56–75. New York: The Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Heinze, Ulrich
2014 “Pictorial body metaphors.” Language and Dialogue 4(3): 425–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holler, Roni
2014 “People with disabilities and the Israeli welfare state: The case of relief work.” Social Security Journal 951: 39–76 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Kama, Amit
2015 “Wounding images: The representation of people with disabilities in the media.” In From Exclusion to Inclusion: Life in a Community of Disabled People in Israel, ed. by Dror Hovav, Mordechai Duvdevani and Clara Feldman, 181–213. Jerusalem: Carmel.Google Scholar
Kasnitz, Devva and Russel P. Shuttleworth
2001 “Anthropology and disability studies.” In Semiotics and Dis/ability: Interrogating Categories of Difference, ed. by Linda J. Rogers and Beth Blue Swadener Albany, 19–42. NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Linton, Simi
1998 Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Masefield, Paddy
2006 Strength: Broadsides from Disability on the Arts. Trentham. Stoke-on-Trent.Google Scholar
Meiri-Dan, Naomi
2009 “The torso in art – Between a long-lost world and a world entire.” The Bezalel History & Theory Department 12: Time between Science and Art, [URL] [Hebrew].
Mitchell, David T. and Sharon L. Snyder
2000 Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2014 “Bodies in action.” Language and Dialogue 4(3): 357–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mor, Sagit, Neta Ziv, Arlene Kanter, Adva Eichengreen, Nissim and Mizrachi
(ed. 2016 Disability Studies: A Reader. Jerusalem: The Van Leer Institute and Hakkibutz Hameuchad [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael
1990 The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinney, Christopher
2004 Photos of the Gods: The Printed Image and Political Struggle in India. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian
2016 Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to researching with Visual Materials. 4th edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rothler, Roni and Ronen Gil
2010 “On the spectrum and beyond it: Representation of people with autism – difference, abilities, rights and everything in between.” Law & Social Change 31:83–101 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Saar, Tsafi
2012 “Is disability actually a gender?” Haaretz June 12 2012 [URL] (accessed May 29, 2017) [Hebrew].
Scotch, Richard K., and Kay Schriner
1997 “Disability as human variation: Implications for policy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 5491: 148–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom and Nicholas Watson
2002 “The social model of disability: An outdated ideology?” Research in Social Science and Disability 21: 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Brett
2014 “Dialogism, Monologism, and Boundaries: Some Possibilities for Disability Studies and Interdisciplinary Research.” Review of Disabilities Studies 6 (3): 25–33.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deidre Wilson
1981 “Irony and the use-mention distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole. New York: American Press.Google Scholar
2012 Meaning and Relevance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sturken, Marita and Lisa Cartwright
2009 Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, John and Sally French
2000 “Towards an affirmation model of disability.” Disability & Society 15(4): 569–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamari, Tomoko
2017 “Body image and prosthetic aesthetics: Disability, technology and Paralympic culture.” Body & Society 231: 2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2015 “Identity as a dialogic concept.” Language and Dialogue 5(1): 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Ggame. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, Jeanne
2000 Susan Laughs. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Wolf, Janet
1993 The Social Production of Art. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Castor, Theresa R.
2021. Dialogic matters. Language and Dialogue 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.