Article published In:
Dialogic Matters: Interrelating Dialogue, the Material, and Social ChangeEdited by Theresa Castor
[Language and Dialogue 11:1] 2021
► pp. 151–170
Edited by Theresa Castor
[Language and Dialogue 11:1] 2021
► pp. 151–170
Dialogue between smart education and classical education
Paradigmatic changes in education arise as a result of the emergence of a fundamentally new reality in society. Society has predicted this new reality through the concepts of post-industrial society, information society, knowledge society. The basis of this new reality is the development of information technologies (IT). These transformations of reality are taking place so rapidly that the institute of education has not had the time to realign itself in this new space and has been late in its development of new breakthroughs in the field of artificial intelligence. The purpose of the study is to show the fundamental paradigmatic differences between classical education and smart education, and to build a bridge of dialogue between these two paradigms.
Keywords: smart education, traditional education, IT technology, big data
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 3.Result/findings
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References
Alassery, Fawaz
2019 “A Smart Classroom of Wireless Sensor Networks for Students Time Attendance System.” In 9th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), pp. 324–331. IEEE. 
Bhat, Anmol, Aneesh C. Rao, Anirudh Bhaskar, V. Adithya, and D. Pratiba
2018 “A Cost-Effective Audio-Visual Summarizer for Summarization of Presentations and Seminars.” In 2018 3rd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS), pp. 271–276. IEEE.
Chou, Pao-Nan
2018 “Smart Technology for Sustainable Curriculum: Using Drone to Support Young Students’ Learning.” Sustainability 10(10): 3819.
Comenius, Jan A., John Locke, Jean-Jacques Russo, Johann Pestalozzi
1989 Pedagogical Heritage. Moscow: Pedagogy.
Compernolle, Theo
2018 Ontketen je brein. Hoe hyperconnectiviteit en multitasking je hersenen gijzelen en hoe je eraan kunt ontsnappen [The brain is liberated. How to prevent congestion and use your full potential]. 3rd edition. Lannoo: Alpina Publisher. [URL] [Accessed December 10, 2019]
Dezhina, I. G. and Klyucharyov, G. A.
2018 “Russian education for an innovative economy: ‘pain points’.” Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia 91: 40–48.
Diehl, Michael and Wolfgang Stroebe
1987 “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3): 497–509.
Fasihuddin, Heba, Shatha Alsolami, Seham Alzahrani, Rawan Alasiri, and Afnan Sahloli
2018 “Smart Tutoring System for Arabic Sign Language Using Leap Motion Controller.” In 2018 International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE), pp. 1–5. IEEE.
Fakoor, Rasool, Amanjit Kainth, Siamak Shakeri, Christopher Winestock, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, and Ruhi Sarikaya
2018 “Direct optimization of f-measure for retrieval-based personal question answering.” In 2018 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), pp. 815–822. IEEE.
Greenfield, Patricia M.
1984 Mind and Media: The Effects of Television, Video Games and Computers. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
Haupt, Michael
2017 “What is a Smart Society? Toward the transcendent model society of 2030.” [URL] [Accessed December 10, 2019]
Kim, Min Kyu, Cassandra J. Gaul, So Mi Kim, and Reeny J. Madathany
2019 “Advance in Detecting Key Concepts as an Expert Model: Using Student Mental Model Analyzer for Research and Teaching (SMART).” Technology, Knowledge and Learning: 1–24.
Kirschner, Paul A. and Aryn C. Karpinski
2010 “Facebook® and Academic Performance.” Computers in Human Behavior 26(6): 1237–1245.
Lee, Chien-Sing and K. Daniel Wong
2018 “Design-computational thinking, transfer and flavors of reuse: Scaffolds to Information and Data Science for sustainable systems in Smart Cities.” In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), pp. 225–228. IEEE.
Newman, Daniel
Nirmala, Junko
Popov, Dmitry
2011 “The Virtual University. For a definition of the terms.” In Virtualization of Inter-University and Academic Communication: Methods, Structure, Communities. Society of Professional Sociologists, Moscow, 8–14.
Sahin, Nurullah and Mehmet Fatih Ozcan
2019 “Effects of Augmented Reality in Teaching Old Turkish Language Mementoes on Student Achievement and Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Technology 10(2): 198–213.
Slavin, B. B.
The SmartSociety project is supported by the European Commission
in the area “FET Proactive: Fundamentals of Collective Adaptive Systems” (FOCAS) (ICT-2011.9.10), as a Collaborative Project (generic), under the 7th Framework programme, Grant agreement n. 600854. 2016. [URL] [Accessed December 17, 2019].
Voyskunsky, A. E., Ermolova, T. D., Khromova, V. M., and Yagolkovsky, S. R.
2016 “Individual and group (in diads) solving design problems in a computer environment: a comparative analysis”. In Digital society as a cultural and historical context of human development, ed. by R. V. Ershova, 68–72. Kolomna: State Social and Humanitarian University.
Warner, J.
Weigand, Edda
Zborovsky, Garold E.
2018 “Is It Possible to be Together, Being Apart: Students and Teachers at the University.” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 91: 49–58.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Castor, Theresa R.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.