Article published in:
Dialogic Matters: Interrelating Dialogue, the Material, and Social Change
Edited by Theresa R. Castor
[Language and Dialogue 11:1] 2021
► pp. 151–170

Dialogue between smart education and classical education

| Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) , Russian Federation
| Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) , Russian Federation
Paradigmatic changes in education arise as a result of the emergence of a fundamentally new reality in society. Society has predicted this new reality through the concepts of post-industrial society, information society, knowledge society. The basis of this new reality is the development of information technologies (IT). These transformations of reality are taking place so rapidly that the institute of education has not had the time to realign itself in this new space and has been late in its development of new breakthroughs in the field of artificial intelligence. The purpose of the study is to show the fundamental paradigmatic differences between classical education and smart education, and to build a bridge of dialogue between these two paradigms.
Keywords: smart education, traditional education, IT technology, big data
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Result/findings
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 22 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00088.sha
References
Alassery, Fawaz
2019 “A Smart Classroom of Wireless Sensor Networks for Students Time Attendance System.” In 9th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), pp. 324–331. IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, Anmol, Aneesh C. Rao, Anirudh Bhaskar, V. Adithya, and D. Pratiba
2018 “A Cost-Effective Audio-Visual Summarizer for Summarization of Presentations and Seminars.” In 2018 3rd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS), pp. 271–276. IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chou, Pao-Nan
2018 “Smart Technology for Sustainable Curriculum: Using Drone to Support Young Students’ Learning.” Sustainability 10(10): 3819. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comenius, Jan A., John Locke, Jean-Jacques Russo, Johann Pestalozzi
1989 Pedagogical Heritage. Moscow: Pedagogy.Google Scholar
Compernolle, Theo
2018 Ontketen je brein. Hoe hyperconnectiviteit en multitasking je hersenen gijzelen en hoe je eraan kunt ontsnappen [The brain is liberated. How to prevent congestion and use your full potential]. 3rd edition. Lannoo: Alpina Publisher. www​.lannoo​.com [Accessed December 10, 2019]
Dezhina, I. G. and Klyucharyov, G. A.
2018 “Russian education for an innovative economy: ‘pain points’.” Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia 91: 40–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, Michael and Wolfgang Stroebe
1987 “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3): 497–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fasihuddin, Heba, Shatha Alsolami, Seham Alzahrani, Rawan Alasiri, and Afnan Sahloli
2018 “Smart Tutoring System for Arabic Sign Language Using Leap Motion Controller.” In 2018 International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE), pp. 1–5. IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fakoor, Rasool, Amanjit Kainth, Siamak Shakeri, Christopher Winestock, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, and Ruhi Sarikaya
2018 “Direct optimization of f-measure for retrieval-based personal question answering.” In 2018 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), pp. 815–822. IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Patricia M.
1984 Mind and Media: The Effects of Television, Video Games and Computers. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haupt, Michael
2017 “What is a Smart Society? Toward the transcendent model society of 2030.” https://​medium​.com​/project​-2030​/what​-is​-a​-smart​-society​-92e4a256e852 [Accessed December 10, 2019]
Kim, Min Kyu, Cassandra J. Gaul, So Mi Kim, and Reeny J. Madathany
2019 “Advance in Detecting Key Concepts as an Expert Model: Using Student Mental Model Analyzer for Research and Teaching (SMART).” Technology, Knowledge and Learning: 1–24.Google Scholar
Kirschner, Paul A. and Aryn C. Karpinski
2010 “Facebook® and Academic Performance.” Computers in Human Behavior 26(6): 1237–1245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chien-Sing and K. Daniel Wong
2018 “Design-computational thinking, transfer and flavors of reuse: Scaffolds to Information and Data Science for sustainable systems in Smart Cities.” In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), pp. 225–228. IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Daniel
2017 “Top 6 Digital Transformation Trends In Education”. https://​www​.forbes​.com​/sites​/danielnewman​/2017​/07​/18​/top​-6​-digital​-transformation​-trends​-in​-education​/#3d84986b2a9a [Accessed December 17, 2019].
Popov, Dmitry
2011 “The Virtual University. For a definition of the terms.” In Virtualization of Inter-University and Academic Communication: Methods, Structure, Communities. Society of Professional Sociologists, Moscow, 8–14.Google Scholar
Sahin, Nurullah and Mehmet Fatih Ozcan
2019 “Effects of Augmented Reality in Teaching Old Turkish Language Mementoes on Student Achievement and Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Technology 10(2): 198–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slavin, B. B.
2020 “XXI century – sunset of universities”. https://​akvobr​.ru​/zakat​_universitetov​.html [Accessed March 17, 2020].
The SmartSociety project is supported by the European Commission
in the area “FET Proactive: Fundamentals of Collective Adaptive Systems” (FOCAS) (ICT-2011.9.10), as a Collaborative Project (generic), under the 7th Framework programme, Grant agreement n. 600854. 2016. http://​www​.smart​-society​-project​.eu/ [Accessed December 17, 2019].
Voyskunsky, A. E., Ermolova, T. D., Khromova, V. M., and Yagolkovsky, S. R.
2016 “Individual and group (in diads) solving design problems in a computer environment: a comparative analysis”. In Digital society as a cultural and historical context of human development, ed. by R. V. Ershova, 68–72. Kolomna: State Social and Humanitarian University.Google Scholar
Warner, J.
2017 “What Happens If Higher Ed Collapses?” Inside Highered. https://​www​.insidehighered​.com​/blogs​/just​-visiting​/what​-happens​-if​-higher​-ed​-collapses [Accessed March 17, 2020].
Weigand, Edda
2019 “Dialogue and Artificial Intelligence.” Language and Dialogue 9(2): 294–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zborovsky, Garold E.
2018 “Is It Possible to be Together, Being Apart: Students and Teachers at the University.” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 91: 49–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Castor, Theresa R.
2021. Dialogic matters. Language and Dialogue 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.