Constituting climate change in dialogic practice
The moral universe of climate actors
In this essay, I present data from a regional climate conference
to demonstrate how speakers engage in dialogic practice to constitute a moral
universe of climate actors. I employ the notion of the science-policy-practice
dialogue to introduce three identity categories – scientist expert, elected
policymaker, and practitioner – which participants use to position themselves
and relate to others and their environments. Using discourse analysis, I attend
to the membership categorization devices speakers use to deploy these identity
categories and constitute the cast of climate characters. Speakers assign
themselves and others to identity categories by making claims to enoughness,
which are then used to establish expectations and justify actions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Climate and the moral environment
- 3.Science-policy-practice dialogue
- 4.Methodological insights
- 4.1Data collection
- 4.2The speakers
- 4.3Method
- 4.4Membership categorization devices
- 4.5The cast of characters
- 4.6Superdiversity and enoughness
- 5.Analysis: Constituting climate change in Tampa Bay
- 5.1Relating to climate change
- 5.2Establishing enoughness
- 5.3Relating to others
- 5.4Relating to environment
- 5.5Climate change as a moral imperative
- 6.Discussion
-
References