Article In:
Language and Dialogue: Online-First ArticlesTransparent communication in public transit
A cross-generic comparison of dialogic features of Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s website and Instagram
The growing need for sustainable lifestyle practices, both individual and collective, has sparked ongoing debates
on environmental and social sustainability. Public transit plays a key role in these discussions, for its capability to meet both
(Mattioli 2016; Miller et al. 2016).
Recently, public bodies have successfully used participatory web tools, such as social media and websites, to promote services and
engage users. This approach has fostered increased trust and improved perceptions of transparency by making information more
accessible (Criado et al. 2013; Song and Lee
2016). Dialogic features in texts, pointing to interaction between writer and audience (Bondi 2022), can create the impression of transparent communication, thereby showcasing willingness to
build an open dialogue. Therefore, this study analyzes dialogic features on the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority’s (MTA) website and Instagram, revealing how both platforms distinctively resort to
dialogicity to enhance communicative transparency and align with the audience’s expectations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Public transit and the path to sustainability
- 2.Public bodies on the participatory web: A strategy for transparency
- 3.Understanding dialogicity in online written communication
- 4.Material and methods
- 4.1Overview of the MTA_IG and the MTA_Web corpora
- 4.2Methods and analytical procedure
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Community and user reference
- 5.2Other user engagement features
- 5.3Dialogicity in relation to transparent communication strategies in MTA
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (51)
Albu, Oana B., and Stefan Wehmeier. 2014. “Organizational transparency and sense-making: The case of Northern Rock.” Journal of Public Relations Research 26(2): 117–133.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The dialogical imagination (ed. by Michael Holquist.). University of Texas Press.
Ball, Ian. 2012. “New development: Transparency in the public sector.” Public Money and Management 32(1): 35–40.
Banister, David. 2005. Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century, New York: Routledge.
Bednarek, Monika, and Carly Bray. 2023. “Trialling corpus search techniques for identifying person-first and identity-first language.” Applied Corpus Linguistics 3(1): 100046.
Bertot, John C., Paul. T. Jaeger, and Justin M. Grimes. 2010. “Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies.” Government Information Quarterly 27(3), 264–271.
Bondi, Marina. 1997. “Reported argument in economics textbooks: A meta-pragmatics of argumentative dialogue.” In Proceedings of the 16th ICL (Paper 41), ed. by Bernard Caron. Elsevier.
. 2018a. “Dialogicity in written language use: Variation across expert action games.” In From pragmatics to dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kovecses, (pp. 137–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018b. “Try to prove me wrong: Dialogicity and audience involvement in economics blogs.” Discourse, Context and Media 241: 33–42.
Criado, J. Ignacio, Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan, and J. Ramon Gil-Garcia. 2013. “Government innovation through social media.” Government information quarterly 30(4): 319–326.
Currie, Graham. 2011. New perspectives and methods in transport and social exclusion research. Emerald.
del Mar Gálvez-Rodríguez, Maria, Alejandro Sáez-Martín, Manuela García-Tabuyo, and Carmen Caba-Pérez. 2018. “Exploring dialogic strategies in social media for fostering citizens’ interactions with Latin American local governments.” Public relations review 44(2): 265–276.
Fairbanks, Jenille, Kenneth D. Plowman, and Brad L. Rawlins. 2007. “Transparency in government communication.” Journal of Public Affairs: An International Journal 7(1): 23–37.
Falcone, Mariasophia, and Ilaria Iori. (in press). “Conveying transparency on social media: A cross-cultural comparison of exemplification strategies in public transport Instagram posts.” ESP Across Cultures.
Fløttum, Kjersti. 2005. “The self and the others: Polyphonic visibility in research articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15(1): 29–44.
Gunawong, Panom. 2015. “Open government and social media: A focus on transparency.” Social Science Computer Review 33(5): 587–598.
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman.
. 2005. “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse studies 7(2): 173–192.
Kent, Michael L., and Maureen Taylor. 1998. “Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web.” Public relations review 24(3): 321–334.
Kent, Michael L., and Petra Theunissen. 2016. “Discussion, dialogue, discourse elegy for mediated dialogue: Shiva the destroyer and reclaiming our first principles.” International Journal of Communication 101: 4040–4054.
Kent, Michael L., Maureen Taylor, and William White, J. 2003. “The relationship between Web site design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders.” Public relations review 29(1): 63–77.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vit Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on.” Lexicography 1(1): 7–36.
Koskela, Merja. 2018. “Disclosing principles of IR communication: Rhetorical moves for constructing transparency.” International Journal of Business Communication 55(2): 164–193.
Koskela, Merja, and Belinda Crawford Camiciottoli. 2020. “Different paths from transparency to trust? A comparative analysis of Finnish and Italian listed companies’ investor relations communication practices.” Studies in Communication Sciences 20(1): 59–76.
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa. 2008. “Genres in contrast: The exploration of writers’ visibility in research articles and research article abstracts.” In English as an additional language in research publication and communication, ed. by Sally Burgess and Pedro Martín-Martín, 105–122. Bern: Peter Lang.
Lucas, Karen. 2012. “Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?” Transport Policy 201: 105–113.
Martin, Jim, and Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mattioli, Giulio. 2016. “Transport needs in a climate-constrained world. A novel framework to reconcile social and environmental sustainability in transport.” Energy Research and Social Science 181: 118–128.
Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (n.d.). About. [URL]
Miller, Patrick, Alexander de Barros, Lina G. Kattan, and S. C. Wirasinghe. 2016. “Public transportation and sustainability: A review.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20(3): 1076–1083.
Moavenzadeh, Fred, Keiksuke Hanaki, and Peter Baccini. 2002. Future cities: dynamics and sustainability (Vol. 11). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
Rybalko, Svetlana, and Trent Seltzer. 2010. “Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter.” Public Relations Review 36(4): 336–341.
Sáez Martín, Alejando, Arturo Haro de Rosario, and Maria D. C. Caba Pérez. 2015. “Using twitter for dialogic communication: Local government strategies in the European Union.” Local Government Studies 41(3): 421–444.
Schiller, Preston L., Eric C. Bruun, and Jeffrey Kenworthy, R. 2010. An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, planning, and implementation. Washington DC: Earthscan.
Sinclair, John. M. 1982. “Planes of discourse.” In The two-fold voice: Essays in honour of Ramesh Mohan, ed. by S. N. A. Rizvi, 70–89. New Delhi: Pitambar Publishing Company.
Song, Changsoo, and Jooho Lee. 2016. “Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government.” Public Performance and Management Review 39(2): 430–453.
Soon, Carol, and Yi Da Soh. 2014. “Engagement@ web 2.0 between the government and citizens in Singapore: dialogic communication on Facebook?” Asian Journal of Communication 24(1): 42–59.
Sundstrom, Beth, and Abbey B. Levenshus. 2017. “The art of engagement: dialogic strategies on Twitter.” Journal of Communication Management 21(1): 17–33.
Taylor, Maureen, Michael. L. Kent, and William J. White. 2001. “How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships.” Public relations review 27(3): 263–284.
Thompson, Geoffrey. 2001. “Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader.” Applied Linguistics 22(1): 58–78.
Titchkosky, Tanya. 2001. “Disability: A rose by any other name? “People-First” language in Canadian society.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 38(2): 125–140.
Vanderheiden, Steve. 2008. Atmospheric justice: A political theory of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wanek-Libman, Mischa. 2021, October 20. “New NY state law to make more of MTA’s data public.” Mass Transit. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from [URL]
Wang, Yuan, and Yiyi Yang. 2020. “Dialogic communication on social media: How organizations use Twitter to build dialogic relationships with their publics.” Computers in human behavior 1041: 106183.