Article published in:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp. 284298
References

References

Arnold, Jennifer E., and Michael K. Tannenhaus
2011“Disfluency Effects in Comprehension: How New Information Becomes Accessible.” In The Processing and Acquisition of Reference, ed. by Edward Gibson, and Neal J. Pearlmutter, 197–218. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Jean E. Foxtree
2002“Using ‘Uh’ and ‘Um’ in Spontaneous Speaking.” Cognition 84: 73–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duran, Nicholas D., Rick Dale, and Roger J. Kreuz
2011“Listeners Invest in an Assumed Other’s Perspective Despite Cognitive Cost.” Cognition 121: 22–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horton, William S., and Boaz Keysar
1996“When Do Speakers Take Into Account Common Ground?” Cognition 59: 91–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juanchich, Maire, Miroslav Sirota, and Christina Lea Butler
2012“The Perceived Functions of Linguistic Risk Quantifiers and Their Effect on Risk, Negativity Perception and Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 118: 72–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juanchich, Marie, Karl Halvor Teigen, and Gaelle Villejoubert
2010 “Is Guilt ‘Likely’ or ‘Not Certain’?: Contrast with Previous Probabilities Determines Choice of Verbal Terms.” Acta Psychologica 135: 267–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Sara W. Smith, and Tanja Luedge
2003“Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1737–1769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moxey, Linda M., and Anthony J. Sanford
1987“Quantifiers and Focus.” Journal of Semantics 5: 189–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000“Communicating Quantities: A Review of Psycholinguistic Evidence of How Expressions Determine Perspectives.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 14 (3): 237–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moxey, Linda M.
2006“Effects of What is Expected on the Focussing Properties of Quantifiers: A Test of the Presupposition-Denial Account.” Journal of Memory and Language 55: 422–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., Janet F. McLean, and Chiara Gambi
2012“Do Addressees Adopt the Perspective of the Speaker?Acta Psychologica. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piercey, M. David
2009“Motivated Reasoning and Verbal vs. Numerical Probability Assessment: Evidence from an Accounting Context.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108: 330–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J., Eugene J. Dawydiak, and Linda M. Moxey
2007“A Unified Account of Quantifier Perspective Effects in Discourse.” Discourse Processes 44 (1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J., and Linda M. Moxey
2011“Complement Focus and Reference Phenomena.” In The Processing and Acquisition of Reference, ed. by Edward Gibson, and Neal J. Pearlmutter, 381–402. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sher, Shlomi, and Craig R.M. McKenzie
2006“Information Leakage from Logically Equivalent Frames.” Cognition 101: 467–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teigen, Karl Halvor, and Wibecke Brun
1995“Yes, but it is Uncertain: Direction and Communicative Intention of Verbal Probabilistic Terms.” Acta Psychologica 88: 233–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallsten, Thomas S., David V. Budescu, Amnon Rapoport, Rami Zwick, and Barbara Forsyth
1986“Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 115(4): 348–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Frans
1994“Polarity Items.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Ron E. Asher, and J.M.Y. Simpson. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Juanchich, Marie, Theodore G. Shepherd & Miroslav Sirota
2020. Negations in uncertainty lexicon affect attention, decision-making and trust. Climatic Change 162:3  pp. 1677 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.