Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.284298
References (18)
Arnold, Jennifer E., and Michael K. Tannenhaus, 2011. “Disfluency Effects in Comprehension: How New Information Becomes Accessible.” In The Processing and Acquisition of Reference, ed. by Edward Gibson, and Neal J. Pearlmutter, 197–218. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Jean E. Foxtree. 2002. “Using ‘Uh’ and ‘Um’ in Spontaneous Speaking.” Cognition 841: 73–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duran, Nicholas D., Rick Dale, and Roger J. Kreuz. 2011. “Listeners Invest in an Assumed Other’s Perspective Despite Cognitive Cost.” Cognition 1211: 22–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horton, William S., and Boaz Keysar. 1996. “When Do Speakers Take Into Account Common Ground?” Cognition 591: 91–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juanchich, Maire, Miroslav Sirota, and Christina Lea Butler. 2012. “The Perceived Functions of Linguistic Risk Quantifiers and Their Effect on Risk, Negativity Perception and Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1181: 72–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juanchich, Marie, Karl Halvor Teigen, and Gaelle Villejoubert. 2010. “Is Guilt ‘Likely’ or ‘Not Certain’?: Contrast with Previous Probabilities Determines Choice of Verbal Terms.” Acta Psychologica 1351: 267–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Sara W. Smith, and Tanja Luedge. 2003. “Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1737–1769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moxey, Linda M., and Anthony J. Sanford. 1987. “Quantifiers and Focus.” Journal of Semantics 51: 189–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Communicating Quantities: A Review of Psycholinguistic Evidence of How Expressions Determine Perspectives.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 14 (3): 237–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moxey, Linda M. 2006. “Effects of What is Expected on the Focussing Properties of Quantifiers: A Test of the Presupposition-Denial Account.” Journal of Memory and Language 551: 422–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., Janet F. McLean, and Chiara Gambi. 2012. “Do Addressees Adopt the Perspective of the Speaker?Acta Psychologica. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piercey, M. David. 2009. “Motivated Reasoning and Verbal vs. Numerical Probability Assessment: Evidence from an Accounting Context.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1081: 330–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J., Eugene J. Dawydiak, and Linda M. Moxey. 2007. “A Unified Account of Quantifier Perspective Effects in Discourse.” Discourse Processes 44 (1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J., and Linda M. Moxey. 2011. “Complement Focus and Reference Phenomena.” In The Processing and Acquisition of Reference, ed. by Edward Gibson, and Neal J. Pearlmutter, 381–402. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sher, Shlomi, and Craig R.M. McKenzie. 2006. “Information Leakage from Logically Equivalent Frames.” Cognition 1011: 467–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teigen, Karl Halvor, and Wibecke Brun. 1995. “Yes, but it is Uncertain: Direction and Communicative Intention of Verbal Probabilistic Terms.” Acta Psychologica 881: 233–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallsten, Thomas S., David V. Budescu, Amnon Rapoport, Rami Zwick, and Barbara Forsyth. 1986. “Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 115(4): 348–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Frans. 1994. “Polarity Items.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Ron E. Asher, and J.M.Y. Simpson. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Teigen, Karl Halvor, Marie Juanchich & Erik Løhre
2023. Combining verbal forecasts: The role of directionality and the reinforcement effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 36:2 DOI logo
Juanchich, Marie, Theodore G. Shepherd & Miroslav Sirota
2020. Negations in uncertainty lexicon affect attention, decision-making and trust. Climatic Change 162:3  pp. 1677 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Robert N. & David R. Mandel
2019. Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers. Judgment and Decision Making 14:6  pp. 683 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.