Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogue and Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Language and Dialogue 7:1] 2017
► pp. 3–25

Analyzing online suicide prevention chats

A communicative constitutive approach

| Université de Montréal (Canada)
| Université de Montréal (Canada)
| ISCC (CNRS/Paris-Sorbonne/UPMC)
In this article, we propose to mobilize a communicative constitutive approach to analyze sessions that took place in the context of online suicide prevention chats in France. By analyzing the detail of a specific excerpt, we propose, more precisely, to draw a portrait of various figures that appear to express themselves in what could be called online help in action (see also Bartesaghi, 2014). Beyond the various psychotherapeutic approaches that are supposed to inform what volunteers are saying and doing, our goal is to start with their practices to determine the figures that they implicitly or explicitly stage in their turns of talk to help out the callers. By analyzing the relational aspects of these conversations, we thus show that these sessions can be compared to a form of modern exorcism, where the callers’ distress, uneasiness or suffering is meant to pass in and through the conversations. It is the conditions of these passages that we are exploring, especially regarding the tensions that they generate.
Keywords: Communicative constitution of reality, suicide prevention chatrooms, conversational analysis, organizational dialogue, social media, internet communication
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The communicative constitution of reality
  • 3.Analyses
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 29 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.02coo
References (68)
References
Allen, Brenda J. 2005. “Social constructionism.” In Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives, ed. by Steve May, and Dennis K. Mumby, 35–53. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 2011. Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnett, Ronald C. 2014. “Ventriloquism as communicative music.” Language Under Discussion 2 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. (1962) How to do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnden, John A. 2014. “Questioning ventriloquism.” Language Under Discussion 2 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartesaghi, Mariaelena. 2014. “Ventriloquism as a matter for discourse analysis.” Language Under Discussion 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas. In press. “How things make things do things with words, or how to pay attention to what things have to say.” Communication Research and Practice.
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Bergeron, Caroline D., and François Cooren. 2012. “The collective framing of crisis management: A ventriloqual analysis of emergency operations centres.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 20 (3): 120–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Gibson, and Gareth Morgan. 1979. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Cooren, François. 2000. The organizing property of communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “The communicative achievement of collective minding: Analysis of board meetings excerpts.” Management Communication Quarterly 17(4): 517–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency.” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation, and ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality.” Journal of Communication 621: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication.” Language Under Discussion, 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015a. “In the name of the law: Ventriloquism and juridical matters.” In Latour and the passage of law, ed. by Kyle McGee, 235–272. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. “In Medias Res: Communication, Existence and Materiality.” Communication Research and Practice 1(4): 307–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Ethics for dummies: Ventriloquism and responsibility.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 24 (1): 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François, and Sergeiy Sandler. 2014. “Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory 241: 225–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culbert, Samuel A., and John J. McDonough. 1985. “How reality gets constructed in an organization.” In Human Systems Development, ed. by Robert Tannenbaum, Newton Margulies, Fred Massarik, and Associates, 122–142. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of grammatology. Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. Limited inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Fultner, Barbara. 2014. “Ventriloquism and accountability.” Language Under Discussion 2 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 2000. The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, Nancie. 2016. “Communication and power in the job interview: Using a ventriloqual approach to analyze moral accounts.” Text and Talk 36 (3): 319–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Innis, H. A.. 1951. The bias of communication. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Jahn, Jody L. S. 2016. “Adapting safety rules in a high reliability context: How wildland firefighting workgroups ventriloquize safety rules to understand hazards.” Management Communication Quarterly, 30 (3): 362–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1976/1985. “Metalanguage as a linguistic problem,” In Roman Jakobson: Selected writings, Vol. VII1, ed. by Stephen Rudy, 113–121. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
James, William. 1912/1976. Essays in radical empiricism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Martine, Thomas, François Cooren, Aurélien Bénel, and Manuel Zacklad. 2016. “What does really matter in technology adoption and use? A CCO approach.” Management Communication Quarterly 30 (2): 164–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1991. Peirce on Signs: Writings on semiotics. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Peters, John D. 1999. Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and BJ Fehr. 2011. “Conversation analysis: An approach to the analysis of social interaction.” In Discourse Studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 165–190. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, Margaret Wetherell, Ros Gill, and Derek Edwards. 1990. “Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice.” Philosophical Psychology 3 (2): 205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Linda L., and Michael E. Pacanowsky. 1983. Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Russill, Chris. 2014. “Planetary pragmatism? A response to François Cooren.” Language Under Discussion 2 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1988. “Presequence and indirection. Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 55–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. “Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition.” In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, John L. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 150–171. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. “Whose text? Whose context?” Discourse and Society 8 (2): 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. “Getting serious: Joke – > serious ‘no’.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1947–1955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989. How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 121: 535–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E., and Warren Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shotter, John. 1993. Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle, and Bruno Latour. 2015. “The sphinx of the work.” In The Different Modes of Existence, ed. by Isabelle Stengers, and Bruno Latour, 11–94. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Souriau, Étienne. 1956/2015. The different modes of existence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, James R. 1988. Une organisation n’est qu’un tissu de communication. Montréal: Cahiers de recherches en communication.Google Scholar
1993. Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Taylor, James R., and François Cooren. 1997. “What makes communication ‘organizational’? How the many voices of a collectivity become the one voice of an organization.” Journal of Pragmatics 271: 409–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, James R., and Elizabeth J. Van Every. 2000. The emergent organization: Communication as site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2011. The situated organization: Case studies in the pragmatics of communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2014. When organization fails: Why authority matters. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret. 1998. “Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue.” Discourse and Society 91: 387–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilhoit, Elizabeth D. 2014. “Ventriloquism’s methodological scope.” Language under Discussion, 2(1) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilhoit, Elizabeth D., and Lorraine G. Kisselburgh. 2015. “Collective action without organization: The material constitution of bike commuters as collective.” Organization Studies 36(5): 573–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Cooren, François, Boris H. J. M. Brummans & Lise Higham
2023. “You’re putting words in my mouth!”: Interaction as mutual ventriloquation. Communication Research and Practice 9:1 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Salama, Amir H.Y. & Rania Magdi Fawzy
2023. The spatiotemporal constitution of Dubai as a semiotically assembled touristscape. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 570 ff. DOI logo
Brummans, Boris HJM, Lise Higham & François Cooren
2022. The work of conflict mediation: Actors, vectors, and communicative relationality. Human Relations 75:4 ► pp. 764 ff. DOI logo
Béchet, Nicolas, Nathalie Garric, Gudrun Ledegen & Frédéric Pugnière-Saavedra
2021. Questionnement réflexif et méthodologique autour d’un corpus sensible recueilli en ligne. Terminal 129 DOI logo
Willems, Renate C. W. J., Constance H. C. Drossaert, Harald S. Miedema & Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
2021. How Demanding Is Volunteer Work at a Crisis Line? An Assessment of Work- and Organization-Related Demands and the Relation With Distress and Intention to Leave. Frontiers in Public Health 9 DOI logo
Toscos, Tammy, Maria Carpenter, Michelle Drouin, Amelia Roebuck, Connie Kerrigan & Michael Mirro
2018. College Students' Experiences with, and Willingness to Use, Different Types of Telemental Health Resources: Do Gender, Depression/Anxiety, or Stress Levels Matter?. Telemedicine and e-Health 24:12 ► pp. 998 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.