Cover not available
Article published In:
Styles, Standards and Meaning in Lesser-Studied Languages
Edited by Uri Horesh, Jonathan R. Kasstan and Miriam Meyerhoff
[Language Ecology 4:1] 2020
► pp. 73–94

Modelling stylistic variation in threatened and under-documented languages

ORCID logo | University of Westminster

The centrality of style is uncontested in sociolinguistics: it is an essential construct in the study of linguistic variation and change in the speech community. This is not the case in the language-obsolescence literature, where stylistic variation among endangered-language speakers is described as an ephemeral, or “marginal” resource, and where speakers exhibiting “stylistic shrinkage” become “monostylistic”. This argument is invoked in variationist theory too, where “monostylism” is presented as support for the tenets of Audience Design (Bell 1984). This article reports on a study that adopts variationist methods in a context of severe language endangerment. Evidence from two linguistic variables in Francoprovençal demonstrates the presence of socially meaningful stylistic variation among the last generation of fluent speakers, offering counter-evidence to classic claims. This evidence is used to argue that accounts of stylistic variation in language obsolescence are not sufficiently nuanced and should be reconsidered in light of recent research.

Keywords: variation and change, language obsolescence, language death, language documentation, style shifting, Francoprovençal
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Structure and use in “language obsolescence”
  • 3.Recent variationist research on style shifting in language obsolescence
  • 4.Research design
    • 4.1Language context
    • 4.2Sample population
    • 4.3Linguistic variables
      • 4.3.1(1)-palatalisation
      • 4.3.1(a)-backing and rounding
    • 4.4Procedures
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Prior results: (l)-palatalisation
    • 5.2Results: (a)-backing and rounding
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion and limitations
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.00010.kas
References
Agha, Asif
2007 Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2020 Language change in language obsolescence. In Richard D. Janda, Brian D. Joseph and Barbara S. Vance (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Volume II, pp. 447–467. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel
2013 Hyperstyle variation in French: Yet another exception culturelle? In Mari C. Jones and David Hornsby (eds.), Language and Social Structure in Urban France, pp. 81–92. Oxford: Legenda.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan
1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2):145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Back in style. Reworking audience design. In Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, pp. 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bert, Michel
2001 Rencontre de langues et francisation : l’exemple du Pilat. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Université Lumière – Lyon II.Google Scholar
Blainey, Darcy
2017 Sociolinguistic research and endangered varieties: The case of Louisiana French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 62(4): 576–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousquette, Joshua and Mike Putnam
2019 Redefining language death: Evidence from moribund grammars. Language Learning 70(1): 188–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle and Martha C. Muntzel
1989 The structural consequences of language death. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence, 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, Katie
2017 Stylistic variation and dialect contraction: The case of /ʒ/ and /h/ in Louisiana French. Fleur de Ling: Tulane University Working Papers, Sociolinguistics, 3(1): 72–79.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Katie and Aarnes Gudmestad
2019 Language death and subject expression: First-person-singular subjects in a declining dialect of Louisiana French. Journal of French Language Studies, 29(1): 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. and William S.-Y. Wang
1975 Sound change: actuation and implementation. Language 51(2): 255–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirkova, Katia, Stanford, James N. & Dehe Wang
2018 A long way from New York City: Socially stratified contact-induced phonological convergence in Ganluo Ersu (Sichuan China). Language Variation and Change 30(1):109–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Sandra
2009 Sociolinguistic stratification and new dialect formation in a Canadian aboriginal community: Not so different after all? In: James N. Stanford & Dennis Preston (eds.), Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages, 109–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Eung-Do
1989 Is phonology going haywire in dying languages? Phonological variations in Chipewyan and Sarcee. Language in Society 18(2): 235–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dal Negro, Silvia
2004 Language contact and dying languages. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 9(2): 47–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C.
1973 Grammatical change in a dying dialect. Language 49(2): 413–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 Introduction. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence, 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994a Stylistic variation in a language restricted to private-sphere use. In Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, 217–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1994b Varieties and variation in a very small place: social homogeneity, prestige norms, and linguistic variation. Language 70(4):631–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Investigating Variation: The Effects of Social Organization and Social Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie, Kaleialohapau‘ole Bethany Chun Comstock and Hina Puamohala Kneubuhl
2017 He nui nā ala e hiki aku ai: Factors influencing phonetic variation in the Hawaiian word kēia. Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication, 131: 65–93.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
1972 On the phonology of language death. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers 81:448–457.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang and Ruth Wodak-Leodolter
1977 Language preservation and language death in Brittany. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 121: 33–44.Google Scholar
Duraffour, Antonin
1932 Phénomènes généraux d’évolution phonétique dans les dialectes francoprovençaux étudie d’après le parler de la commune de Vaux (Ain). Revue de Linguistique Romane 81: 1–280.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penny
2012 Three waves of variation study: the emergence of social meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 411: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan
1978 Peasant men can’t get wives: language change and sex roles in a bilingual community. Language in Society 7(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Phonological style in bilingualism. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, 290–302. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gardette, Pierre
1941 Géographie phonétique du Forez. Mâcon: Protat.Google Scholar
1950–1956 Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Lyonnais. Paris: Éditions du C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
1983 Études de géographie linguistique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules and Edmond Edmont
1902–1910 Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Grinevald Craig, Colette
1997 Language contact and language degeneration. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 257–270. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harrison, Michelle and Aurélie Joubert
(eds.) 2018 French Language Policies and the Revitalisation of Regional Languages in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M.
1989 Language obsolescence and language history: matters of linearity, leveling, loss, and the like. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence, 347–354. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holloway, Charles E.
1997 Dialect Death: The Case of Brule Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E.
2009 Getting off the Goldvarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mari C. and Ishtla Singh
2005 Exploring Language Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R.
2015 Variation and change in Francoprovençal: A study of an emerging linguistic norm. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Kent.Google Scholar
2019 Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment. Language in Society 48(5): 685–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R. and Daniela Müller
2018 (l) as a sociolinguistic variable in Francoprovençal. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2491: 99–118.Google Scholar
Klingler, Thomas and Amanda LaFleur
2007 L’enquête PFC en Louisiane. In Sylvain Detey and Dominique Nouveau (eds.), Bulletin PFC N. 7, PFC : Enjeux descriptifs, théoriques et didactiques 2007, pp. 331–340. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse II.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1971 Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1): 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1984 Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In John Baugh & Joel Sherzer (eds.), Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics, 28–53. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2017 Writing a linguistic symphony: analysing variation while doing language documentation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62(4): 525–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond and Edouard Beniak
1989 Language contraction and linguistic change: The case of Welland French. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence, 287–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Daniela
2011 Developments of the lateral in Occitan dialects and their Romance and cross-linguistic context. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Universitat de Tolosa – Lo Miralh.Google Scholar
Palosaari, Naomi and Lyle Campbell
2011 Structural aspects of language endangerment. In Peter K. Austin and Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, pp. 100–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pooley, Tim
2000 Sociolinguistics, regional varieties of French and regional languages in France. Journal of French Language Studies 10(2): 117–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pope, Mildred K.
1952 From Latin to Modern French with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. and Penelope Eckert
2001 Introduction. In Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, pp. 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roche, Gerald
2020 Abandoning endangered languages: ethical loneliness, language oppression, and social justice. World Anthropologies 122(1): 164–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roesch, Karen A.
2012 Language Maintenance and Language Death: The Decline of Texas Alsatian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1989 Pidgins, creoles, immigrant, and dying languages. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence, 369–384. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Satyanath, Shobha
2015 Language variation and change: the Indian experience. In Dick Smackman and Petrick Heinrich (eds.), Globalising Sociolinguistics: Challenging and Expanding Theory, pp. 107–122. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie
1997 Accommodation vs. concentration: Dialect death in two post-insular communities. American Speech 72(1): 12–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Investigating ‘self-concious’ speech: the performance register in Ocracoke English. Language in Society 27(1): 53–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Annette
1985 Young People’s Dyirbal: An Example of Language Death from Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanford, James N. and Dennis Preston
(eds.) 2009 Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James N.
2016 A call for more diverse sources of data: Variationist approaches in non-English contexts. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(4):525–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. and Terrence Kaufman
1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. California: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuaillon, Gaston
1967 Principes pour distinguer français et francoprovençal. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 311: 292–296.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt
2002 Language death and dying. In Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 764–787. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zulato, Alessia, Kasstan, Jonathan R. and Naomi Nagy
2018 An overview of Francoprovençal vitality in Europe and North America. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2491:11–29.Google Scholar