Article published in:
Styles, Standards and Meaning in Lesser-Studied Languages
Edited by Uri Horesh, Jonathan R. Kasstan and Miriam Meyerhoff
[Language Ecology 4:1] 2020
► pp. 115–130

Style variation in the second formant

What does it mean to be “refined” in Baba Malay?

| National University of Singapore
Baba Malay speakers perceive words ending with [al], [aɾ], and [as] as kasar ‘coarse’, and their counterparts ending with [ɛ] as halus ‘refined’. The contrast is neither phonetic, phonological or morphological. Instead, it may be mitigated by sound symbolism operationalized by F2. The frontness of [ɛ] is associated with a smaller articulatory space in the oral cavity, and hence refinedness, as compared to the more backwards coarse forms. This study employs a matched-guise perceptual task. Refined forms are elicited from speakers. The F2 in the relevant endings is adjusted twice upwards and twice downwards in steps of 100Hz. Listeners rate these guises on a scale of 1 to 5, 5 being most associated with ‘refined’ values. Results show that the higher F2 is, the more likely listeners are to associate the guise with ‘refined’ values.
Keywords: matched-guise, creole, style, register, acoustic, perceptual, sound symbolism, Baba Malay
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The kasar-halus phenomenon in Baba Malay and its issue for linguistics
  • 2.Methodology: Within-subject matched guise
    • 2.1Within-subject matched guise
    • 2.2Tokens
    • 4.3Task
    • 2.4Participants
  • 3.Results: F2 and refinedness
  • 4.Implications: The role of sound symbolism in style variation
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.00012.lee
References

References

Ansaldo, Umberto; Lisa Lim; and Salikoko S. Mufwene
2007 The sociolinguistic history of the Peranakans: What it tells us about “creolization.” Deconstructing Creole. Typological Studies in Language. 731, ed. by Umberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews, and Lisa Lim, 203–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society 131.145–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul; and David Weenink
2013 Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.59, retrieved 20 November 2013 from http://​www​.praat​.org/
Calder, Jeremy
2019 The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society 481.31–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette
2014 Phonetic Detail and Dimensionality in Sound-shape Correspondences: Refining the Bouba-Kiki Paradigm. Language and Speech 571. SAGE Publications Ltd. 367–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie
2013 Experimental Methods in Sociolinguistics. Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A practical guide, ed. by Janet Holmes and Kirk Hazen, 58–73. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2019 The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority 95.27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford
1976 The religion of Java. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gonda, J.
1949 The functions of word duplication in Indonesian languages. Lingua 21.170–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew; and Jeffrey Heath
1998 Sex, Sound Symbolism, and Sociolinguistics. Current Anthropology 391.421–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gwee, William Thian Hock
2006 A Baba Malay Dictionary: The First Comprehensive Compendium of Straits Chinese Terms and Expressions. Singapore: Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R.
2019 Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment. Language in Society 481.685–720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.; Carmen Jany; and Wilson Silva
2017 Introduction: Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages. Language Documentation & Conservation 131.1–5.Google Scholar
Kendall, Maurice George
1955 Rank Correlation Methods. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter; and Keith Johnson
2011 A Course in Phonetics, Sixth Edition. International Edition. Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E.; Richard Hodgson; Robert C. Gardner; and Samuel Fillenbaum
1960 Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 601.44–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Nala H.
2014 A grammar of Baba Malay with sociophonetic considerations. Manoa: University of Hawai’i PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2019 Peranakans in Singapore: Responses to language endangerment and documentation. (Ed.) Mário Pinharanda-Nunes and Cardoso, Hugo C. Language Documentation & Conservation. Special issue on Documentation and conservation of contact languages in Southeast Asia and East Asia: Current issues and ongoing initiatives 191.123–140.Google Scholar
2020 Utilizing the Matched-guise as a Method of Examining Perceptual Change in an Endangered Creole. Applied Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez
2014 Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 431.539–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa
2016 The art of losing: Beyond java, patois and postvernacular vitality – Repositioning the periphery in global Asian ecologies. Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights, ed. by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz, 283–312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, John; and James Stanford
2017 Documenting Sociolinguistic Variation in Lesser- studied Indigenous Communities: Challenges and Practical Solutions. Language Documentation & Conservation 131.116–136.Google Scholar
McCune, Keith Michael
1985 The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Jakarta: Badan Penyelenggara Seri Nusa, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.Google Scholar
McLeod, A. Ian
2014 Kendall. R package version 2.2 http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/packge​=kendall
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2019 Unnatural bedfellows? The sociolinguistic analysis of variation and language documentation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 491. Taylor & Francis. 229–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1994 The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. Sound symbolism, ed. By Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols and John J. Ohala, 222–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji
1986 Sociolinguistic varieties of Malay. The Fergusonian impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Sociolinguistics and the Sociology of Language Vol. 2, ed. by Joshua A. Fishman, Andrée Tabouret-Keller, Michael Clyne, Bh. Krishnamurti, and Mohamed Abdulaziz, 191–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartłomiej
2013 Akustyk: Speech analysis and synthesis plug-in for Praat. Previously available at: http://​github​.com​/akustyk
Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo
1968 Javanese speech levels. Indonesia 61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Teresa
2020 Embodying “tech”: Articulatory setting, phonetic variation, and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 241.328–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Şahin, Hülya
2015 Cross-linguistic influences: Dutch in contact with Papiamento and Turkish. LOT Dissertations Series, 405. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1929 A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 121. US: Psychological Review Company. 225–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1995 Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. Sound Symbolism, ed. by Johanna Nichols, John J. Ohala, and Leanne Hinton, 40–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . https://​www​.cambridge​.org​/core​/books​/sound​-symbolism​/relative​-motivation​-in​-denotational​-and​-indexical​-sound​-symbolism​-of​-wascowishram​-chinookan​/6B073730B8FF6F5DC8F7FD0FAE10989A.   Crossref
Stevens, Alan M.
1965 Language levels in Madurese. Language 411.294–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Chee Beng
1979 Baba and Nyonya: a study of the ethnic identity of the Chinese Peranakan in Malacca. New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Wessing, Robert
1974 Language levels in Sundanese. Man 91.5–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willemsen, Jeron; and Ehm Hjort Miltersen
2020 The expression of vulgarity, force, severity and size: phonaesthemic alternations in Reta and in other languages. Studies in Language. In press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar