Cover not available
Article published In:
Language of Empire, Language of Power
Edited by Kees Versteegh
[Language Ecology 2:1/2] 2018
► pp. 112–127

The Russian-Chinese Pidgin

An attempt at the sociology of grammar

| European University at St. Petersburg

For a long period in history, the border between Russian Empire and China was a place of constant and intensive cultural and language contacts, which resulted in the emergence of the Russian-Chinese Pidgin. In the 19th century it was used by no less than one million people around the border with China, in an area of more than 3,000 kilometers long. The grammatical analysis of Russian-Chinese Pidgin reveals several features (e.g. using the imperative as a basic verb form), which can be interpreted not only linguistically but sociologically as well, because they are intertwined with the social positions of the contact groups and their attitudes towards each other. Interestingly, features found in the pidgin’s grammar have certain parallels in foreigner-directed talk used nowadays by Russian speakers when communicating with Chinese speakers in the border area, which may indicate there are rather stable linguistic stereotypes associated with these contact situations.

Keywords: language contact, Russian-Chinese Pidgin, pidgin grammar, interethnic communication, communicational asymmetry, linguistic stereotypes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Brief history of the Russian-Chinese Pidgin
  • 3.Social context of pidgin usage
  • 4.The Russian-Chinese Pidgin’s lexicon and grammar: An overview
  • 5.Grammar and social asymmetry
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.18003.fed
References

Sources

Arsenjev, Vladimir
1921 Po Ussurjiskomu kraju (Dersu-Uzala): Putešestvie v gornuju oblast’ “Sixote-Alin’”. Vladivostok: Tipografija “Exo”.Google Scholar
Belikov, Vladimir and Perexval’skaja, Elena
1990 Field records.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. A.
1905 Po novym mestam: Očerki i putevye zametki. 1901–1903. St. Petersburg: Izdanie tovariščestva ‘Obščestvennaja pol’za’.Google Scholar
Klaprot, G.-Iu
1816 Opisanie Kjaxty (iz putešestvij G. Klaprota). Syn Otečestva 411: 81–104.Google Scholar
Maksimov, S. V.
1864 Na Vostoke. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Martynov, Andrej
1819 Živopisnoe putešestvie ot Moskvy do Kitajskoj Granicy. St. Petersburg: Tipografija Aleksandra Pljušara.Google Scholar
Noskov, Ivan
1861 Kjaxta. Irkutsk.Google Scholar
Staxeev, Dmitrij
1994 [1865] Zapiski moego znakomogo. Bajkal 1994(3): 99–124.Google Scholar
Timkovskij, Egor
1824 Putešestvie v Kitaj čerez Mongoliju v 1820 i 1821 godax. I. Perejezd do Pekina. St. Petersburg: Tipografija Medicinskogo Departamenta Ministerstva Vnutrennix Del.Google Scholar
Timkowski, Georg
1825 Reise nach China durch die Mongoley in den Jahren 1820 und 1821. I. Reise nach Pekin. Leipzig: Fleischer.Google Scholar
Vigel, Filipp
2000 [1856] Zapiski. Moscow: Zaxarov. Online publication: [URL] Accessed 19 June 2017.
Åfarli, Tor A. and Mæhlum, Brit
2014 Language variation, contact and change in grammar and sociolinguistics In Tor. A. Åfarli and Brit Mæhlum, eds. The Sociolinguistics of Grammar. Amsterdam/ Philadephia: John Benjamins. 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anikhovskij, S. E., D. P. Bolotin, A. P. Zabiyako, and T. A. Pan
2005 “Man’čžurskij Klin”: Istorija, narody, religija. Blagoveščensk: Amurskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Google Scholar
Bakich, Olga
2011 Did you speak Harbin Sino-Russian? Itinerario 35(3): 23–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cejtlin, Stella
2009 Očerki po slovoobrazovaniju i formoobrazovaniju v detskoj reči. Moscow: Znak.Google Scholar
Čerepanov, S. I.
1853 Kjaxtinskoe kitajskoe narečie russkogo jazyka. Izvestija imperatorskoj Akademii Nauk po Otdeleniju Russkogo Jazyka i Slovesnosti 21: 370–377.Google Scholar
Fedorova, Kapitolina
2000 Specifika upotreblenija svjazki “est’” i processy uproščenija v russkom jazyke. Problemy Social’nogo i Gumanitarnogo Znanija II1: 334–348. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropejskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
2006 Russian foreigner talk: Stereotype and reality. In Dieter Stern and Christian Voss, eds. Marginal Linguistic Identities: Studies in Slavic Contact and Borderland Varieties. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 177–190.Google Scholar
2011 Transborder trade on the Russian-Chinese border: Problems of interethnic communication. In B. Bruns and J. P. Miggelbrink, eds. Subverting Borders: Doing Research on Smuggling and Small-Scale Trade. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Springer. 107–128.Google Scholar
2013 Speaking with and about Chinese: Language attitudes, ethnic stereotypes and discourse strategies in interethnic communication on the Russian-Chinese border. Civilisations 62(1&2): 71–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles
1971 Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In Dell Hymes, ed. Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 141–145.Google Scholar
Foust, Clifford M.
1969 Muscovite and Mandarin: Russia’s Trade with China and its Setting, 1727–1805. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gusev, Valentin
2013 Tipologija imperativa. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Holm, John
2004 An Introduction to Pidgins and Creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Itkin, Ilja
2007 Russkaja morfonologija. Moscow: Gnozis.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1980 On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindgren, E. J.
1938 An example of culture contact without conflict: Reindeer Tungus and Cossacks of Northwestern Manchuria. American Anthropologist 40(4): 613–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesterova, E. I.
2008 Atlantida gorodskogo masštaba: Kitajskie kvartaly v dal’nevostočnyx gorodax (konec XIX – načalo XX veka). Etnografičeskoe Obozrenie 2008(4): 44–58.Google Scholar
Neumann, Günter
1966 Zur chinesisch-russischen Behelfssprache von Kjachta. Die Sprache 121: 237–251.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy and Dennis Preston
1999 Folk Linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Oglezneva, Elena
2007 Russko-kitajskij Pidžin: Opyt sociolingvističeskogo opisanija. Blagoveščensk: Amurskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Google Scholar
Perexval’skaja, Elena
2007 Dialektnye različija kak rezul’tat jazykovogo sdviga (bikinskij dialekt udegejskogo jazyka). In Nikolaj Vakhtin, ed. Jazykovye izmenenija v uslovijax jazykovogo sdviga. St. Petersburg: Nestor. 252–281.Google Scholar
2008 Russkie pidzhiny. St. Petersburg: Aleteija.Google Scholar
2010 Sovremennye formy russkogo pidžina: Ussurijskij variant. In Arto Mustajoki, Ekaterina Protassova and Nikolai Vakhtin, eds. Instrumentarium of Linguistics: Sociolinguistic Approaches to Non-Standard Russian. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. 175–187.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1988 Pidgin and Creole Languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sebba, Mark
1997 Contact Languages: Pidgins and Creoles. Houndmills and London: Macmillan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Roman
2010 Chinese Pidgin Russian. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25(1): 5–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stern, Dieter
2005 Myths and facts about the Kyakhta trade pidgin. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 20(1): 175–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šprintsin, A. G.
1968 O russko-kitajskom dialekte na Dal’nem Vostoke. Strany i Narody Vostoka VI1: 78–85. Moscow: Vostočnaja Literatura.Google Scholar
Šukhardt, G.
1884 Majmačinskoe narečie. Russkij filologičeskij sbornik 12(4): 318–320.Google Scholar
Todd, Loreto
1984 Pidgins and Creoles. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1993 Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4(2): 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, Kees
2014 Pidgin verbs. Infinitives or imperatives? In Isabelle Buchstaller, Anders Holmberg and Mohammad Almoaily, eds. Pidgins and Creoles beyond Africa-Europe Encounters. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 141–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vrubel’, S. A.
1931 Russko-kitajskie jazykovye skreščenija. Kultura i Pis’mennost’ Vostoka 7–81: 131–140.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fedorova, Kapitolina
2022. Border Texts: Border-Crossing Narratives and Local Myths in the Russian-Chinese Border Areas of Russia. In New Directions in Linguistic Geography, ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Fedorova, Kapitolina
2022. Can We Witness the (Re)making of a Pidgin in Real Time? Contact in the Russian–Chinese Border Area. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Fedorova, Kapitolina S.
2021. Communication on the Russian–Chinese Border: Problems in Obtaining Data. In Strategies for Knowledge Elicitation, ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Versteegh, Kees
2022. Marking statements of fact in early pidgins. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 37:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.