Cover not available
Part of
Documentary Linguistics: Working with Communities
Edited by Sumittra Suraratdecha and Toshihide Nakayama
[Language Ecology 3:2] 2019
► pp. 233–254
Research Project Report

Language revitalization and community initiatives

An Indian perspective

| Visva-Bharati, West Bengal
Language is an integral part of the social identity and ethnicity of a community apart from being its mode of communication. Language plays a key role to preserve the history, culture and identity of a community. In this era of globalization, cultural and linguistic homogenization is a common trend. The state and dominant linguistic communities expect ‘others’ or the minority groups to assimilate into the dominant culture and language. Arguments for the maintenance and revitalization of minority and endangered languages have been made by many linguists around the world. Language rights, language planning and language documentation programmes are some steps taken by government and externally-funded organizations to protect endangered and indigenous languages. Besides the initiatives taken by the non-members of the community, the future of an endangered language and culture has been decided by the role and attitude of the community towards its community-specific linguistic and cultural identity. India is a very diverse country as far as its linguistic and cultural heritage is concerned. This project is enriched with insights from field experience in various districts of West Bengal, a state in India, where the speakers of endangered linguistic communities are aware of their linguistic rights and are highly engaged in the language and cultural revitalization, and in that their degree of progress and success is commendable. This paper aims at demonstrating the major role played by the communities themselves in language-revitalization programmes.
Keywords: language endangerment, language revitalization, community attitude
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Language revitalization
    • 2.1Language revitalization: Earlier successful attempts
  • 3.Linguistic landscape of India
  • 4.Mother-tongue and minority linguistic rights
  • 5.Revitalization programmes
  • 6.Languages in India
    • 6.1Language attitudes and community associations
    • 6.2Role of script
    • 6.3Mother tongue education programme
    • 6.4Media, social media and language revitalization
  • 7.Future steps
  • 8.Conclusion
  • References
  • Web sources
Published online: 9 September 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.19001.bha
References (39)
References
Campbell, Lyle. 1994. Language death. IN; R.E. Asher, ed. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.1960–1968.Google Scholar
Craig, C. 1992. A constitutional response to language endangerment: The case of Nicaragua. Language 681: 17–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dua, Hans R. 1985. Language Planning in India. New Delhi: Harnam Publications.Google Scholar
1992. Communication Policy and Language Planning. Mysore: Yashoda Publications.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Garrett, P., Nikolas, C. and Williams, A. 2003. Investigating Language Attitudes: Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Grenoble, L. A. & Whaley, L. J. 2006. Saving Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimes, Barbara F., ed. 1996. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Fourteenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL]
Hermes, M. 2007. Moving toward the language: Reflections on teaching in an indigenous immersion school. Journal of American Indian Education 46(1): 54–71.Google Scholar
Hinton, L. 2001. Sleeping languages: Can they be awakened? In Leanne Hinton and Kenneth L. Hale, eds. The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. Netherlands: Brill. 411–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Revitalization of endangered languages. In Peter K. Austin and Julia Sallabank, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge University Press. 291–311.Google Scholar
Hoffman, C. 1991. An Introduction to Bilingualism. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Juhuang, L. 1990. Language Attitude, Language Relations and Language Work. Tianjing Guiji Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. 1992. The world’s language in crisis. Language 681: 4–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehman, C. Date Unknown. Maori and Hawaiian language revitaization. [URL]. Accessed 25th November 2019.
May, S. 2006. Language policy and minority rights. In T. Ricento, ed. An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 255–272.Google Scholar
Meghanathan, R. 2011. Language policy in education and the role of English in India: From library language to language of empowerment. In Hywel Coleman, ed. Dreams and Realities: Developing Countries and the English Language. United Kingdom: British Council.Google Scholar
Moseley, Christopher, ed. 2010. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger. 3rd Edition. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel and Suzanne Romaine. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rao, S. 2008. India’s language debate and education of linguistic minorities. In Economic and Political Weekly, India.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 2006. Planning for the survival of linguistic diversity. Language Policy 5(4): 441–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Linguistic diversity, sustainability, and the future of the past. In King et al., eds. Sustaining Linguistic Diversity: Endangered and Minority Languages and Languages Varieties. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. 7–22.Google Scholar
Sallabank, Julia. 2011. Language policy for endangered languages. In Peter K. Austin and Julia Sallabank. eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge University Press. 277–290.Google Scholar
. 2013. Attitudes to Endangered Languages: Identities and Policies. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shahbaz, M., Azam, L. and Rahim, A. 2015. Language use and language attitudes of Pahari speakers towards Punjabi language: A sociolinguistic study of district Bhimber. Advances in Social Sceiences Research Journal 2(3): 14–21.Google Scholar
Singh, K. S. 1993. An anthropological atlas: Ecology and cultural traits, languages and linguistic traits, demographic and biological traits. People of India 111. India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Parman. 2018. Revitalization of minority languages: Implications for language policy and planning. In Indian Languages and Culture: A Debate. India: The Marginalised Publication. 61–94.Google Scholar
Singh, U. N., Bhattacharjee, B., Chakraborty, R. and Tripathi, A. K. 2018. Languages & Culture on Margin: Guidelines for Field Work on Endangered Languages. India, Timepass Publication.Google Scholar
Warner, S. L. 2001. The movement to revitalize Hawaiian language and culture. In Leanne Hinton and Kenneth L. Hale, eds. The Green Book of Revitalization in Practice. Brill: Netherlands. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. 1998. Technology and indigenous language eevitalization: Analyzing the experience of Hawaii. Canadian Modern Language Review 55(1): 140–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Web sources
BBC [URL]. Accessed 26th November 2019
CENSUS India [URL] Accessed 12th November 2019
Ethnologue [URL] Accessed 16th May 2019
Linguistic Atlas Project [URL] Accessed 20th November 2019
The Constitution of India [URL] Accessed 25th November 2019
The Hindu [URL] Accessed 20th November 2019
UNESCO [URL] Accessed 15th November 2019
[URL]