Cover not available
Article published In:
Documentary Linguistics: Working with Communities
Edited by Sumittra Suraratdecha and Toshihide Nakayama
[Language Ecology 3:2] 2019
► pp. 189–208

Sociolinguistic survey of Nepalese languages

A critical evaluation

| Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
This paper presents a close inspection of the research conducted with a sociolinguistic survey of Nepalese languages developed by Linguistic Survey of Nepal (LiNSuN) Project (2008–2018). The paper provides an overview of the linguistic situation of Nepal with brief outlines of various linguistic surveys in different times. It also examines the various sociolinguistic surveys (SLS) and their implications. Through a reflection of my personal engagement in various activities of the surveys, e.g. Kaike (Regmi 2012), Bhojpuri and Awadhi (Thakur and Regmi 2013), Khadiya (Dahal and Yadava 2014), Gangai (Gautam and Thakur 2014) and Thulung (Gautam and Sapkota 2014), Aathpahariya (Regmi 2015) and Tharu (Yadav 2015), Limbu (Gautam and Thakur 2016), and Dhuleli (Prasai and Regmi 2017) and Lohwa (Gautam 2017), and quantitative information available in the literature, it is concluded that previous surveys have mainly focused on sociolinguistic features and have disregarded the ethnolinguistic characteristics.
Keywords: pilot survey, Linguistic Survey of Nepal (LiNSuN), ethnolinguistic, multilingualism, sociolinguistic features
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Writing systems
    • 1.2The legal status of Nepalese languages
  • 2.Linguistic surveys in Nepal: An overview
  • 3.Sociolinguistic Survey of Nepalese languages (2008–2018)
    • 3.1Sociolinguistic questionnaires
    • 3.2Recorded text testing (RTT)
    • 3.3Sentence repetition test (SRT)
    • 3.4Participatory method (PM)
    • 3.5Lexical similarity (210-word list)
  • 4.SLS progress activities
    • 4.1Pilot survey (2008)
    • 4.2SLS management and administration
    • 4.3SLS progress report
  • 5.Case studies in SLS
    • 5.1Upper hill languages
    • 5.2Rai Kiranti languages
    • 5.3Language spoken in Terai
    • 5.4Cross-border languages
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Geographical factors
    • 6.2Sociocultural factors
    • 6.3Language contact and multilingualism
    • 6.4SLS nature and tools
    • 6.5Ethnolinguistic observations
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 9 September 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.19004.gau
References (56)
References
Bandhu, Chura Mani. 1968. Report of the preliminary linguistic survey in Bagmati and Janakpur zones of Nepal. [in Nepali]. Kathmandu: TU, CNAS.Google Scholar
Blair, Frank. 1990. Survey on a Shoestring: A Manual for Small-Scale Language Surveys. SIL and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Casad, Eugene. 1974. Dialect Intelligibility Testing. Norman: SIL International.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). 2001. Population Census. Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
. 2011. Population Census. Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Dahal, Binod and Surya Yadav. 2014. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Khadiya. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Gautam, Bhim Lal. 2014. Sociolinguistic survey of Nepalese languages. Paper presented at the workshop on Nepalese Languages. Laboratoire Dynamique Du Langage, Lyon, France. 27 March 2014.
, 2017. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Lohwa Language. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
. 2018. Sociolinguistic survey of Nepalese languages. Paper presented at Documentary Linguistics – Asian Perspectives 3 (DLAP3). Mahidol University, Thailand. 23–25 July 2018.
Gautam, Bhim Lal and Indresh Thakur. 2014. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Koch and Gangai. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
. 2016. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Limbu. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Gautam, Bhim Lal and Suren Sapkota. 2014. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Thulung. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Gautam, Bhim Lal, Regmi, Dan Raj and Ambika Regmi. 2017. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Lohwa Language. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Glover, Warren W. 1971. Swadesh list calculations on thirty Tibeto-Burman languages. Kathmandu: SIL.Google Scholar
Glover, Warren W. and John K. Landon. 1980. Gurung dialects. In S. A. Wurm, ed. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No. 7. Pacific Linguistics Series A, No. 53. Canberra: Australian National University. 29–77.Google Scholar
Grierson, George A. 1927. Linguistic Survey of India, volume 1 part 1. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas [Reprint 1967].Google Scholar
Government of Nepal. 2015. Constitution of Nepal. Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Grierson, George and Sten Konow. 1898–1927. Linguistic Survey of India, 191 volumes, Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India. Reprinted 1967. Delhi: Motilal Banarasi Das.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin. 1993. Sociolinguistic Survey of Nepal. A proposal for a joint project to be conducted under the auspices of the Centre for Nepal and Asian Studies with the sponsorship of the Summer Institute of Linguistics. Draft Three, 15 April 1993.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gerd. 1991. The Rai of Eastern Nepal: Ethnic and Linguistic Grouping. Findings of The Linguistic Survey of Nepal. Kathmandu: Linguistic Survey of Nepal and CNAS.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian H. 1847–48. On the Aborigines of the sub-Himalayas. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 161: 1235–44, 171: 73–78.Google Scholar
1857a. Comparative grammar of the languages of the broken tribes of Nepal. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 26(5): 317–332.Google Scholar
1857b. Comparative vocabulary of the several languages (dialects) of celebrated people called Kirantis, now occupying the easternmost province of the kingdom of Nepal, or Basin of River Arun. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 26(5): 333–71.Google Scholar
1857c. Vayu vocabulary. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 26(5–6): 372–485.Google Scholar
1857–8. Bahing Vocabulary. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 26(5): 486–522, 27(5): 393–442.Google Scholar
1880. Vocabulary of the dialects of the Kiranti languages. Miscellaneous Essays Relating to Indian Subjects. Volume 11, Section II: On Himalayan ethnology. London. 178–215.Google Scholar
Hoernle, Rudolf. 1880. A Comparative Grammar of the Gaudian Languages, with Special Reference to the Eastern Hindi, accompanied by a Language-map and a Table of Alphabets. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2000. Qualitative Methods in Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig, eds. 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Seventeenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL] (/country/np)
LiNSuN Questionnaires. 2008. Central Department of Linguistics, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.Google Scholar
Michailovsly, Boyd. 1988. Phonological typology of Nepal languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11(2): 25–50.Google Scholar
National Planning Commission, GON. 2007. Linguistic Survey of Nepal: Proposal.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Clare F., ed. 1992. Sociolinguistic Survey of Northern Pakistan , Volume II 1: Languages of Northern Areas. NIPS and SIL.Google Scholar
Pokharel, Bal Krishna. 2002 VS. Rastra Bhasa [National language]. Kathmandu: Sajha.Google Scholar
Prakashan, Pradhan Rajendra and Ava Shrestha. 2005. Ethnic and Caste Diversity: Implications for Development. Kathmandu: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Radolf, Carla. 1989. Sentence Repetition for Studies of Community Bilingualism. Pre-publication draft, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Regmi, Ambika. 2012. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Kaike. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
. 2015. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Aathpariya. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Regmi, Dan Raj. 2010. Linguistic Survey of Nepal: Progress, Challenges and Prospect. Paper presented at the Linguistic Survey of Nepal: Progress, Challenges and Prospect and Field Report Presentation Workshop, Central Department of Linguistics, Tribhuvan University, Nepal, 21 June 2010.
Regmi, Dan Raj and Balaram Prasain. 2017. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Dhuleli. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F. 1984. Word list analysis in the field with a notebook computer. Occasional Papers in Academic Computing 51. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Thakur, Indresh and Ambika Regmi. 2013. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Bhojpuri. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Thakur, Indresh and Surya Yadav. 2013. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Awadhi. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Toba, Sueyoshi. 1973. Preliminary exploratory language survey report of some Rai languages (dialects).Google Scholar
. 1998. A Bibliography of Nepalese Languages and Linguistics. Kathmandu, Central Department of Linguistics, TU.Google Scholar
Toba, Sueyoshi, Ingrid Toba and Novel Kishore Rai. 2002. UNESCO Language Survey Report. Kathmandu: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Varenkamp, Bryan K. 1996. Tamang Tam: A Sociolinguistic Study of Eastern Tamang Dialects (in Nepal). Kathmandu: TU, CNAS.Google Scholar
Webster, Jeff. 1992. The sociolinguistic survey of Tibeto-Burman dialects: North Gorkha District (mimeo).Google Scholar
. 2001. The sociolinguistic study of Limbu. Journal of Nepalese Literature, Art and Culture 4(1):51–84.Google Scholar
Winter, Werner. 1984. Distribution of Languages and Sublanguages in Eastern Nepal. TU CNAS.Google Scholar
. 1986. The linguistic survey of Nepal. In Bernhard Kolver, ed. Aspects of Nepalese Traditions. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. 171–179.Google Scholar
Yadav, Dev Narayan and Binod Dahal. 2014. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Khadiya. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU.Google Scholar
Yadav, Surya. 2015. A Sociolinguistic Survey of Tharu. Unpublished report. LiNSuN Central Department of Linguistics, TU, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
Yadava, Yogendra P. 2007. Linguistic diversity in Nepal: Perspectives on language policy. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Constitutionalism and diversity in Nepal, CNAS, Kathmandu, 22–24 August 2007.
2014. Language. Population Monograph, volume II1. Kathmandu: CBS.Google Scholar
Yadava, Yogendra P. and Mark Turin. 2007. Indigenous languages of Nepal: A critical analysis of the linguistic situation and contemporary issues. In The Indigenous Languages of Nepal (ILN): Situation, Policy Planning and Coordination. Lalitpur: NFDIN.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Gautam, Bhim Lal & Madhu Giri
2024. Trajectories of Language and Culture of Gopali Community in Chitlang Valley. Glottodidactica 51:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Joshi, Puskar R. & Zohreh R. Eslami
2024. Barriers to language maintenance and multilingual schooling: examining the language policy provisions in Nepal’s constitutions. Cogent Education 11:1 DOI logo
Gautam, Bhim Lal
2021. Language Contact and Implications to Language Policies. In Language Contact in Nepal, ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Gautam, Bhim Lal
2022. Language politics in Nepal: A socio-historical overview. Journal of World Languages 7:2 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Gautam, Bhim Lal
2024. MULTILINGUALISM AND LANGUAGE SHIFT IN TAMANG: TRENDS AND IMPACTS. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Gautam, Bhim Lal
2024. Aspects of language contact in Newar. International Journal of Multilingualism 21:1 ► pp. 516 ff. DOI logo
Pathak, Lekhnath Sharma, Sabita Rijal & Poshak Pathak
2021. Instruction in second language enhances linguistic and cognitive abilities in first language as well: evidence from public school education in Nepal. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 5:2 ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.