This article gives an overview of our ongoing research on the processing and representation of light verb constructions. Light verb constructions consist of a light verb, which is semantically bleached, and an event nominal, which identifies the kind of event. Together the noun and the verb determine the structure of that event (the number of participants and their roles). Critically, in light verb constructions the canonical mapping from surface syntactic structure to event structure is disrupted. The present studies examine this phenomenon through the lens of language processing. We summarize several behavioral and neurolinguistic studies that show that the interpretation of light verb constructions relies on noncanonical mappings between syntax and semantics, while their syntactic structure is not different from non-light constructions.
1996The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Baayen, R.R, Dijkstra, T., and Schreuder, R
1997Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 36: 94–117.
Baker, Mark C
1989Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bicknell, Klinton and Roger Levy
2012Word predictability and frequency effects in a rational model of reading.
Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Conference
.
Bock, Kay
1986Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18: 355–387.
Bock, Kay
1989Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31: 163–186.
Bock, Kay, and Loebell, Helga
1990Framing sentences. Cognition, 35: 1–39.
Boland, Julie
1997The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(4): 423–484.
Briem, Daniela, Balliel, Britta, Rockstroh, Brigitte, Butt, Miriam, Schulte im Walde, Sabine and Assadollahi, Ramin
2010Distinct processing of function verb categories in the human brain. Brain Research, 1249: 173–180.
Brugman, Claudia
2001Lights verbs and polysemy. Language Sciences, 23: 551–578.
Butt, Miriam
1995The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Butt, Miriam
2010The Light Verb Jungle: Still Hacking Away. In Complex Predicates in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Mengistu Amberber, Mark Harvey and Brett Baker (Eds), 48–78. Cambridge University Press.
Chang, Franklin, Bock, Kay, and Goldberg, Adele
2003Can thematic roles leave traces of their places?Cognition, 90: 29–49.
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
Croft, William
2001Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Culicover, Peter, and Jackendoff, Ray
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press.
Durie, Mark
1988“Verb serialization and verbal prepositions”. Oceanic Linguistics, 27: 1–23.
Embick, D., Hackl, M., Schaeffer, J., Kelepir, M., & Marantz, A
2009Mapping semantic spaces: A constructionist account of the light verb eat in Persian. In From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations. M. Vanhove (Ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Folli, Raffaella, Harley, Heidi and Karimi, Simin
2004Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua, 115(10): 1365–1401.
Fried, Mirjam and Östman, Jan-Ola
2004Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective. Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman. 11–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele
2003Words by default: The Persian complex predicate construction. In Mismatch: form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar, Elaine Francis and Laura Michaelis (Eds.), 117–149. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Goldberg, Adele
2009The Nature of Generalization in Language. [Target Article] Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1): 93–127.
Hale, Kenneth L., and Keyser, Samuel J
1993On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–100. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth L., and Keyser, Samuel J
2002Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hofmeister, Philip and Sag, Ivan
2010Cognitive constraints and island effects.Language, 86: 366–415.
Jackendoff, Ray
1974A deep structure projection rule. Linguistic Inquiry, 5(4): 481–505.
Jackendoff, Ray
1991Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41: 9–45.
Jackendoff, Ray
1997The Architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray
2002Foundations of Language. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray
2007A Parallel Architecture Perspective on Language Processing.Brain Research, 1146: 2–22.
Jung, Dukkyo
2002Light Verb just as a Little v. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 59–74.
Kay, Paul
1995Construction Grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics. Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jan Blommaert (Eds), 171–177. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Larson, R
1988On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19: 3.
Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McElree, Brian, and Griffith, Teresa
1995Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(1): 134–157.
McGinnis, M
2002On the systematic aspect of idioms. Linguistic Inquiry, 33. 4: 665–672.
Newman, John
1996Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 7.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Paczynski, Martin, and Kuperberg, Gina
To appear. When events change their nature.
Palmer, Martha, Gildea, David, and Kingsbury, Paul
2005The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1): 71–206.
Phillips, Colin, and Lewis, C
To appear. Derivational order in syntax: Evidence and architectural consequences. In Directions in Derivations, C. Chesi (Ed.) Elsevier
Pickering, Martin, and Ferreira, Victor
2008Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134: 427–459.
Piñango, Maria M., Mack, Jennifer, and Jackendoff, Ray
To appear. Semantic combinatorial processes in argument structure: Evidence from light verbs.
Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2006
.
Pinker, Steven
1999Words and Rules. New York: Perennial.
Talmy, Leonard
1978The relation of grammar to cognition: A synopsis. Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing 2, D. Waltz (Ed.). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Revised version in Talmy,Toward a Cognitive Semantics, MIT Press.
Thothathiri, Malathi and Snedeker, Jesse
2012The Role of Thematic Roles in Sentence Processing: Evidence from Structural Priming in Young Children. Unpublished Manuscript.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1982Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat?Language, 58(4): 753–799.
2013It takes two to kiss, but does it take three to give a kiss? Categorization based on thematic roles. Language and Cognitive Processes, (ahead-of-print), 1–7.
Wittenberg, Eva, and Snedeker, Jesse
In preparation. Syntactic Priming Across Constructions: Light Verbs.
Wittenberg, Eva, Paczynski, Martin, Wiese, Heike, Jackendoff, Ray and Kuperberg, Gina.2014
The difference between “giving a rose” and “giving a kiss”: Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 73C: 31–42.
2022. Assigning meaning to light verbs in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2022. Конструкции с опорным глаголом в русском и итальянском языках / Support Verb Constructions. A Russian-Italian Contrastive Analysis [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 49],
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.