The mental representation and processing of light verbs
Eva Wittenberg | Tufts University | Harvard University | Potsdam University
This article gives an overview of our ongoing research on the processing and representation of light verb constructions. Light verb constructions consist of a light verb, which is semantically bleached, and an event nominal, which identifies the kind of event. Together the noun and the verb determine the structure of that event (the number of participants and their roles). Critically, in light verb constructions the canonical mapping from surface syntactic structure to event structure is disrupted. The present studies examine this phenomenon through the lens of language processing. We summarize several behavioral and neurolinguistic studies that show that the interpretation of light verb constructions relies on noncanonical mappings between syntax and semantics, while their syntactic structure is not different from non-light constructions.
References
Alsina, Alex
1996
The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar
. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Baayen, R.R, Dijkstra, T., and Schreuder, R
1997 Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model.
Journal of Memory and Language
, 36: 94–117.
Baker, Mark C
1989
Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bicknell, Klinton and Roger Levy
2012 Word predictability and frequency effects in a rational model of reading.
Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Conference
.
Bock, Kay
1986 Syntactic persistence in language production.
Cognitive Psychology
, 18: 355–387.
Bock, Kay
1989 Closed-class immanence in sentence production.
Cognition
, 31: 163–186.
Bock, Kay, and Loebell, Helga
1990 Framing sentences.
Cognition
, 35: 1–39.
Boland, Julie
1997 The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension.
Language and Cognitive Processes
, 12(4): 423–484.
Briem, Daniela, Balliel, Britta, Rockstroh, Brigitte, Butt, Miriam, Schulte im Walde, Sabine and Assadollahi, Ramin
2010 Distinct processing of function verb categories in the human brain.
Brain Research
, 1249: 173–180.
Brugman, Claudia
2001 Lights verbs and polysemy.
Language Sciences
, 23: 551–578.
Butt, Miriam
1995
The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu
. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Butt, Miriam
2010 The Light Verb Jungle: Still Hacking Away. In
Complex Predicates in Cross-Linguistic Perspective
,
Mengistu Amberber,
Mark Harvey and
Brett Baker (Eds), 48–78. Cambridge University Press.
Chang, Franklin, Bock, Kay, and Goldberg, Adele
2003 Can thematic roles leave traces of their places?
Cognition
, 90: 29–49.
Chomsky, Noam
1981
Lectures on Government and Binding
. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam
1995
The Minimalist Program
. MIT Press.
Croft, William
2001
Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective
. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Culicover, Peter, and Jackendoff, Ray
2005
Simpler Syntax
. Oxford University Press.
Durie, Mark
1988 “Verb serialization and verbal prepositions”.
Oceanic Linguistics
, 27: 1–23.
Embick, D., Hackl, M., Schaeffer, J., Kelepir, M., & Marantz, A
2001 A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency.
Cognitive Brain Research
, 10(3): 345–348.
Family, Neiloufar
2009 Mapping semantic spaces: A constructionist account of the light verb eat in Persian. In
From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations
.
M. Vanhove (Ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Folli, Raffaella, Harley, Heidi and Karimi, Simin
2004 Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates.
Lingua,
115(10): 1365–1401.
Fried, Mirjam and Östman, Jan-Ola
Goldberg, Adele
1995
Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure
. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele
2003 Words by default: The Persian complex predicate construction. In
Mismatch: form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar
,
Elaine Francis and
Laura Michaelis (Eds.), 117–149. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Goldberg, Adele
2009 The Nature of Generalization in Language. [Target Article]
Cognitive Linguistics
, 20(1): 93–127.
Hale, Kenneth L., and Keyser, Samuel J
1993 On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations.
The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger
, 53–100. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth L., and Keyser, Samuel J
2002
Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hofmeister, Philip and Sag, Ivan
2010 Cognitive constraints and island effects.
Language,
86: 366–415.
Jackendoff, Ray
1974 A deep structure projection rule.
Linguistic Inquiry
, 5(4): 481–505.
Jackendoff, Ray
1991 Parts and boundaries.
Cognition
41: 9–45.
Jackendoff, Ray
1997
The Architecture of the language faculty
. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray
2002
Foundations of Language
. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray
2007 A Parallel Architecture Perspective on Language Processing.
Brain Research,
1146: 2–22.
Jung, Dukkyo
2002 Light Verb just as a Little v. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 59–74.
Kay, Paul
1995 Construction Grammar. In
Handbook of Pragmatics
.
Jef Verschueren,
Jan-Ola Östman, and
Jan Blommaert (Eds), 171–177. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Larson, R
1988 On the Double Object Construction.
Linguistic Inquiry,
19: 3.
Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005
Argument Realization
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McElree, Brian, and Griffith, Teresa
1995 Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
, 21(1): 134–157.
McGinnis, M
2002 On the systematic aspect of idioms.
Linguistic Inquiry, 33
. 4: 665–672.
Newman, John
1996
Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study
. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 7.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Paczynski, Martin, and Kuperberg, Gina
To appear.
When events change their nature.
Palmer, Martha, Gildea, David, and Kingsbury, Paul
2005 The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles.
Computational Linguistics
, 31(1): 71–206.
Phillips, Colin, and Lewis, C
To appear.
Derivational order in syntax: Evidence and architectural consequences. In
Directions in Derivations
,
C. Chesi (Ed.) Elsevier
Pickering, Martin, and Ferreira, Victor
2008 Structural priming: A critical review.
Psychological Bulletin
, 134: 427–459.
Piñango, Maria M., Mack, Jennifer, and Jackendoff, Ray
To appear.
Semantic combinatorial processes in argument structure: Evidence from light verbs.
Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2006
.
Pinker, Steven
1999
Words and Rules
. New York: Perennial.
Talmy, Leonard
1978 The relation of grammar to cognition: A synopsis.
Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing 2
,
D. Waltz (Ed.). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Revised version in Talmy,Toward a Cognitive Semantics, MIT Press.
Thothathiri, Malathi and Snedeker, Jesse
2012 The Role of Thematic Roles in Sentence Processing: Evidence from Structural Priming in Young Children. Unpublished Manuscript.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1982 Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat?
Language
, 58(4): 753–799.
Wiese, Heike
2006 „Ich mach dich Messer“ – Grammatische Produktivität in Kiez-Sprache (‚Kanak Sprak‘).
Linguistische Berichte,
207: 245–273.
Winhart, Heike
2002 Funktionsverbgefüge im Deutschen. Zur Verbindung von Verben und Nominalisierungen. Dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
Wittenberg, Eva, and Piñango, Maria M
Wittenberg, Eva, and Snedeker, Jesse
2013 It takes two to kiss, but does it take three to give a kiss? Categorization based on thematic roles.
Language and Cognitive Processes, (ahead-of-print), 1–7.
Wittenberg, Eva, and Snedeker, Jesse
In preparation.
Syntactic Priming Across Constructions: Light Verbs.
Wittenberg, Eva, Paczynski, Martin, Wiese, Heike, Jackendoff, Ray and Kuperberg, Gina. 2014
The difference between “giving a rose” and “giving a kiss”: Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction.
Journal of Memory and Language, 73C: 31–42.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
ÖZGE, Duygu, Gülten ÜNAL & İsa Kerem BAYIRLI
2022.
Assigning meaning to light verbs in Turkish.
Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 33:1
► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2022.
Конструкции с опорным глаголом в русском и итальянском языках / Support Verb Constructions. A Russian-Italian Contrastive Analysis [
Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 49],
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.