Article published in:
Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 169–194

Chains in Minimalism

| Yokohama National University
| University of Maryland
This paper considers how the system identifies multiple occurrences of a syntactic object α as a chain, a set of copies. For Chomsky (1995, 2000, 2001), copies can arise only by movement (internal merge); lexical items introduced by external merge are stipulated to be distinct tokens, coded by indexation, or by introducing some other special concept of numeration, which violates the inclusiveness condition. We argue that this type/token dichotomy is unnecessary and that copies can be distinguished from repetitions in terms of syntactic context alone. This yields interesting situations where two arguments introduced by external merge may also be recognized as a chain, and we propose that obligatory control and parasitic gaps should be analyzed in exactly these terms.
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.11.07mar
References

References

Bošković, Željko and Nunes, Jairo
2007 “The copy theory of movement: A view from PF.” In The Copy Theory of Movement, Norbert Corver and Jairo Nunes (eds), 13–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, John
2008 “On reducing control to movement.” Syntax 11: 125–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Minimalist inquiries: The framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Linguistics, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 “On phases.” In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Problems of projection.” Lingua 130: 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard
1977 “Filters and control.” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
1993 “The theory of principles and parameters.” In An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim Von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds), 506–569. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara
2005 “On the nature of merge: External merge, internal merge, and parallel merge.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 475–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris
1997 Local Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris and Stabler, Edward
2011 “A formalization of minimalist syntax.” Unpublished manuscript.
Engdahl, Elizabeth
1984 “Parasitic gaps.” Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grinder, John
1970 “Super equi-NP deletion.” In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting - Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society (ed.), 297–317. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay
1993 “On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations.” In The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 53–110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
1998 “Movement and chains.” Syntax 1 (2): 99–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 “Movement and control.” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasai, Hironobu
2010 “Parasitic gaps under multiple dominance.” English Linguistics 27 (2): 235–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitahara, Hisatsugu
2000 “Two (or more) syntactic categories vs. multiple occurrences of one.” Syntax 3 (3): 151–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kobele, Gregory
2006 “Generating Copies: An Investigation into Structural Identity in Language and Grammar.” Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard and Fiengo, Robert
1974 “Complement object deletion.” Linguistic Inquiry 5: 535–571.Google Scholar
Martin, Roger
1996 “A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
2001 “Null case and the distribution of PRO.” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 141–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Roger and Uriagereka, Juan
2008 “Competence for preferences.” In Gramatika Jaietan: Patxi Goenagaren Omenez (Grammar Festival: A Tribute to Patxi Goenaga), Xabier Artiagoitiak and Joseba Lakarrak (eds), 561–572. Bilbao: University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
2013 “Equi redux.” In Deep Insights, Broad Perspectives: Essays in Honor of Mamoru Saito, Yoichi Miyamoto, Daiko Takahashi, Hideki Maki, Masao Ochi and Koji Sugisaki, Asako Uchibori (eds), 292–308. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Mercier, Romain, Kawai, Yoshikazu and Errington, Jeff
2013 “Excess membrane synthesis drives a primitive mode of cell proliferation.” Cell 152 (5): 997–1007. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
2004 Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter
1967 The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
San Martin, Itziar and Uriagereka, Juan
2002 “Infinitival complementation in Basque.” In Erramu Boneta: A Festschrift for Rudolf P. G. de Rijk, Xabier Artiagoitia, Patxi Goenaga and Joseba Lakarra (eds), 597–610. Bilbao: University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1997 “Formal and substantive elegance in the minimalist program.” In The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory, Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin Gärtner and Manfred Bierwisch (eds), 170–204. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2008 Syntactic Anchors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1980 “Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 208–238.Google Scholar
Zhou, Enhua H., Martinez, Fernando D. and Fredberg, Jeffrey J.
2013 “Cell rheology: Mush rather than machine.” Nature Materials 12: 184–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Mizuguchi, Manabu
2019. Ambiguous Labeling and Full Interpretation. Studia Linguistica 73:3 ► pp. 563 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.