Part of
Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 304314
Babyonyshev, Maria and Marin, Stefania
2006“Acquisition of pronominal clitics in Romanian.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 5: 17–44.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1993“A minimalist program for linguistic theory”. In The View from Building 20, Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998 “Minimalist inquiries”. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Gavarró, Anna and Mosella, Marta
2009“Testing syntactic and pragmatic accounts of clitic omission.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008), Jean Crawford et al. (eds), 25–35. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Haznedar, Belma
2006 “Crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Turkish and English: The overuse of subjects in bilingual Turkish”. Paper presented at GALANA 2 , Montreal.
Kapia, Enkeleida
2010The Role of Syntax and Pragmatics in the Structure and Acquisition of Clitic Doubling in Albanian. Ph.D. Boston University.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvana
2004“Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: a case of morphosyntactic convergence.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7: 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “On linguistic complexity, interfaces and incomplete acquisition”. Paper at Mind-Context Divide. University Iowa.
Mykhaylyk, Roksolana and Ko, Heejeong
2010“Optional scrambling is not random: Evidence from English-Ukrainian acquisition.” In Variation in the Input, Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, Merete Anderssen, Kristine Bentzen and Marit Westergaard (eds), 207–240. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Radeva-Bork, Teodora
2012Single and Double Clitics in Adult and Child Grammar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang (Potsdam Linguistic Investigations; 9).Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2006Interface Strategies. Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Jeannette
Serratrice, Ludovica, Sorace, Antonella and Paoli, Sandra
2004“Subjects and objects in Italian-English bilingual and monolingual acquisition”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7: 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakali, Vina and Wexler, Kenneth
2003“Why children omit clitics in some languages but not in others: New evidence from Greek”. In Proceedings of GALA 2003¸ Jacqueline van Kampen and Sergio Baauw (eds), 493–504. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria, Sorace, Antonella, Heycock, Caroline, Filiaci, Francesca
2004“First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near native speakers of English”. International Journal of Bilingualism 8: 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth
1998“Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage”. Lingua 106: 23–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003“The unique checking constraint as the explanation of clitic omission in SLI and normal development”. In Essays on Syntax, Morphology and Phonology in SLI, Celia Jakubowicz, Lea Nash, Kenneth Wexler (eds). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, Gavarró, Anna and Torrens, Vincent
2004“Feature checking and object clitic omission in child Catalan and Spanish”. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’, Groningen 2002, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe and Petra Sleeman (eds), 253–269. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Peng
2011 “Interface Conditions in Child Language: A View from Mandarin Chinese.” Ph.D. dissertation, Macquarie University.Google Scholar