Article published in:Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 315–349
Intensionality, grammar, and the sententialist hypothesis
Intensionality, the apparent failure of a normal referential interpretation of nominals in embedded positions, is a phenomenon that is pervasive in human language. It has been a foundational problem for semantics, defining a significant part of its agenda. Here we address the explanatory question of why it exists. Distinguishing lexical aspects of meaning from those that depend on grammatical patterning, we argue that intensionality is mainly grammatical in nature and origin: intensionality is an architectural consequence of the design of human grammar, although, in language use, lexical and pragmatic factors also play a role in the genesis of intuitions of non-substitutability salva veritate. Over the course of this paper, we offer a sequence of ten empirical arguments for this conclusion. A particular account of recursive structure-building in grammar is also offered, which predicts intensionality effects from constraints that govern how nominals of different grammatical types are embedded as arguments in larger units. Crucially, our account requires no appeal to a traditionally postulated semantic ontology of ‘senses’ or ‘thoughts’ as entities ‘denoted’ by embedded clauses, which, we argue, are explanatorily inert. It also covers intensionality characteristics in apparently non-sentential complements of verbs, which we further argue, against the claims of the recent ‘Sententialist Hypothesis’, not to be sentential complements in disguise.
Published online: 24 September 2014
Arsenijevic, Boban and Hinzen, Wolfram
Borsley, Robert D. and Kornfilt, Jaklin
Carlson, Gregory N.
Den Dikken, Marcel, Larson, Richard and Ludlow, Peter
Fodor, Jerry A. and Lepore, Ernest
Fodor, Jerry A.
Haegeman, Liliane and Ürögdi, Barbara
2008 “Intensional transitives and Silent HAVE: Distinguishing between Want and Need.” Proceedings of WCCFL 27, 211–219.
Harves, Stephanie and Richard S. Kayne
Kayne, Richard S.
Kornfilt, Jaklin and Witman, John
Larson, Richard K.
Partee, Barbara H.
Ross, John Robert
Sheehan, Michelle and Hinzen, Wolfram
Szabo, Zoltan G.
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.