Part of
Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 1732
Charette, M
1990Licence to govern. Phonology 7(2): 233–255. CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Conditions on Phonological Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Mongolian and Polish meet government-licensing. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2.Google Scholar
to appear. Headedness, A & head-alignment: Capturing the properties of the vowels of Montreal French. To appear in Glossa .
Cyran, E
1996Licensing properties of nuclei and principle ranking in Irish. The Linguistics Review 13.Google Scholar
2010Complexity Scales and Licensing in Phonology (Studies in generative grammar 105). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, J
1990Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7(2): 255–300. CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994English Sound Structure. Oxford: Backwell.Google Scholar
Harris, J. & E. Gussmann
1998Final Codas: Why the West was wrong. In E. Cyran (ed.), Structure and Interpretation. Studies in Phonology. Lublin: Folium.Google Scholar
Heo, Y
1994Empty Categories and Korean Phonology. PhD dissertation, SOAS.Google Scholar
Kaye, J
1990‘Coda’ Licensing. Phonology 7(2): 301–330. CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences. In H. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2 , SOAS. Reprinted in A Festschrift for Edmund Gussmann from his friends and colleagues”, H. Kardela & B. Szymaned (eds), Lublin, KUL.
Kaye, J. & J. Lowenstamm
1981Syllable structure and markedness theory. In A. Belletti, L. Brandi & L. Rizzi (eds), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference. Pisa: Scuola normale superior.Google Scholar
Kaye, J., J. Lowenstamm & J.R. Vergnaud
1990Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7(2). CUP.Google Scholar
Le Moniteur Acadien
Lowenstamm, J
1996CV as the only syllable type. In J. Durand & B. Laks (eds), Current Trends in Phonology. Models and Methods. Salford, Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.Google Scholar
1999The beginning of the word. In J. Rennison & K. Kühnhammer (eds), Phonologica 1996. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
2003Remarks on mutæ cum liquida and branching onsets. In S. Ploch (ed.), Living on the Edge, 28 papers in Honour of Jonathan Kaye. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucci, V
1973Phonologie de l’acadien (Studia Phonetica 7). Didier.Google Scholar
Rowicka, G
1999On Ghost Vowels. A Strict CV Approach. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Scheer, T
1996Une théorie de l'interaction directe entre consonnes. Contribution au modèle syllabique CVCV, alternances e-ø dans les préfixes tchèques, structure interne des consonnes et la théorie X-barre en phonologie. Ph.D dissertation, Université Paris 7.Google Scholar
1998aA unified model of proper government. The Linguistics Review 15.Google Scholar
1998bGoverning domains are head-final. In E. Cyran (ed.), Structure and Interpretation. Studies in Phonology. Lublin: Folium.Google Scholar
2004A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Vol. 1: What is CVCV, and Why Should it Be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Muta cum Liquida in the Light of Tertenia Sardinian Metathesis and Compensatory Lengthening Latin tr – Old French Vrr. In M-H. Côté & E. Mathieu (eds), Variation within and across Romance Languages, Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Ottawa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheer, T. & M. Zikova
2010The Coda Mirror v2. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(4): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar