Cover not available
Part of
Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 133–144

Charting the vowel space

| University College London
The vowel quadrilateral of the International Phonetic Association, couched entirely in articulatory terms, distorts in a number of ways the phonetic and phonological reality of the vowel space. It implies that cardinal vowels are articulatorily equidistant, which they are not. It is four-cornered, whereas acoustic and phonological evidence suggests a triangular space. It obscures the markedness relations of the vowels, so that its eight corner vowels are an unnatural set, including common and very rare vowels. A genuinely sound-based chart avoids these distortions and offers the possibility of an objectively standardized set of reference qualities.
Keywords: vowel space, vowel quadrilateral, vowel triangle, articulation, acoustics, cardinal vowels, reference qualities, markedness
Article outline
  • 1.The vowel sound space
  • 2.Sound space vs. tongue space
  • 3.An alternative reference vowel chart
  • 4.Phonological discussion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14.c8
References (17)
References
Backley, Phillip. 2011. An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Alexander Melville. 1867. Visible Speech: The Science of Universal Alphabetics. London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2016. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.21. [URL] (Accessed 25 September 2016).
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey. 1995. The elements of phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations, 34–79. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2000. Vowel patterns in mind and sound. In Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr & Gerard Docherty (eds.), Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, 185–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association. 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Gunnar Fant & Morris Halle. 1952. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates (Technical Report 13). Massachusetts: Acoustics Laboratory, MIT.Google Scholar
Jones, Stephen. 1929. Radiography and pronunciation. British Journal of Radiology 2: 149–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1960. Outline of English Phonetics, 9th edn. (reprinted 1972). Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1967. Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Vowels and Consonants, 1st edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. n.d. An academic life. [URL] (Accessed 30 October 2016).
Lindsey, Geoff. 2013. The vowel space. [URL] (Accessed 30 October 2016).
Russell, G.O. 1928. The Vowel, its Psychological Mechanism, as Shown by X-ray. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
The Principles of the International Phonetic Association (1949). 2010. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40(3): 299–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John. 2009. ɘ. [URL] (Accessed 30 October 2016).