Chapter published in:
Interfaces in Grammar
Edited by Jianhua Hu and Haihua Pan
[Language Faculty and Beyond 15] 2019
► pp. 2547


Anderson, John. & Ewen, Colin
1987Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on Nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar 184–221. Waltham MA, Toronto, London: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1977Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 425–504.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert & Riemsdijk, Henk C. van
(eds.) 2001Semi-Lexical Categories. The Content of Function Words and the Function of Content Words. Pages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
2006Relators and Linkers: The syntax of predication, Predicate Inversion, and copulas Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1985A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1991 “Extended projection”. Ms., Brandeis University.Google Scholar
2005Extended Projection. J. Grimshaw: Words and Structure 1–69. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1988Matching Projections. In Anna Cardinalett, Guglielmo Cinque & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Constituent Structure: Papers from the 1987 Glow Conference 101–121. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Harris, John
1994English Sound Structure. Cambridge, MA., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, John & Lindsey, Geoff
1995The elements of phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers in Phonology 34–79. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1943Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse. København,: B. Lunos bogtrykkeri a/s.Google Scholar
1953Prolegomena to a theory of language. (Indiana University publications in anthropology and linguistics, memoir 7.) Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun
1984Transitivity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1977X-bar syntax: a study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1985The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Charm and Government. Phonology Yearbook 2, 305–328.Google Scholar
1990Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology. Phonology 7, 305–328.Google Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay
1968Review of Sven Jacobson ‘Adverbial Positions in English’ (Stockholm: Studentbok AB, 1964). Language 44, 357–375.Google Scholar
Liao, Roger Wei-wen
2011The symmetry of syntactic relations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department Linguistics Los Angeles: USC, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1980Remarks on infinitives: a case for a filter. Journal of Italian Linguistics 5, 101–155.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1960Eléments de linguistique générale. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John
1986OCP effects: gemination and anti-gemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207–263.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
1983Parametrizing the notion head. The Journal of Linguistic Research 2, 57–76.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter & Riemsdijk, Henk C. van
1986Features and projections. (Studies in generative grammar, 25.) Dordrecht, Holland; Riverton, N.J.: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth Lee
1967Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. (Janua linguarum Series maior, 24.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2010Uttering Trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk C. van
1978A case study in syntactic markedness: the binding nature of prepositional phrases. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press, later published by Foris Publications Dordrecht and currently by Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
1982Locality principles in syntax and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm 693–708. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1984On pied-piped infinitives in German relative clauses. In Jindrich Toman (ed.), Studies in German Grammar 165–192. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1988The representation of syntactic categories. Proceedings of the Conference on the Basque language, 2nd Basque World Congress 104–116. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Central Publication Service of the Basque Government.Google Scholar
1990Functional prepositions. In Harm Pinkster & Inge Genée (eds.), Unity in Diversity: papers presented to Simon C. Dik on his 50th birthday 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
1997Push chains and drag chains: complex predicate split in Dutch. In Shigeo Tonoike (ed.), Scrambling 7–33. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
1998Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections. The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics 2, 1–48.Google Scholar
2001A far from simple matter. Syntactic reflexes of syntax-pragmatics misalignments. In Istvan Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish (eds.), Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2006Grafts follow from Merge. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of Interpretation 17–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008Identity Avoidance: OCP-effects in Swiss Relatives. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud 227–250. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1972aThe category squish: Endstation Hauptwort. In Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi & Gloria C. Phares (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 316–338. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
1972bDouble-ing. Linguistic Inquiry 3, 61–86.Google Scholar
1973Nouniness In Osamu Fujimura (ed.), Three Dimensions of Linguistic Research. Tokyo: TEC Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget
2009The structure of phonological theory. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford A.
1984The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology 1, 129–155.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1976Formal properties of phonological rules. In Robert E. Butts & Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics 299–318. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
1980A formal theory of vowel harmony. In Robert Vago (ed.), Vowel Harmony 49–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2003On a certain notion of “occurrence”: the source of metrical structure, and of much more. In Stefan Ploch (ed.), Living on the Edge. 28 Papers in Honour of Jonathan Kaye 599–632. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008Letter to Noam Chomsky and Howard Lasnik on “Filters and Control”, April 17 1977. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud 3–15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winslow, Charles Frederick
1869Force and Nature. Attraction and Repulsion: The Radical Principles of Energy, Discussed in their Relations to Physical and Morphological Developments. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co (Facsimile edition by the University of Michigan Library)Google Scholar
Yip, Moira
1998Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In Stephen G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax 216–246. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar