Cover not available
Part of
Interfaces in Grammar
Edited by Jianhua Hu and Haihua Pan
[Language Faculty and Beyond 15] 2019
► pp. 341–362

Chapter 12
Syntax/semantics interface and interpretation of Chinese NP1NP2V construction by Japanese speakers

| Shanghai International Studies University
| Shanghai International Studies University
Sorace’s (2005, 2006) Interface Hypothesis proposed that properties of syntax are relatively easier to acquire than ones involving interfaces. The article provides supporting evidence with a study investigating second language (L2) acquisition of the interpretation of Chinese NP1NP2V construction by Japanese speakers. The canonical OSV interpretation for Chinese NP1NP2V is considered a syntactic property. The acceptability of SOV interpretation for Chinese NP1NP2V depends on the combined effects of the semantic compatibility factor and the prominence factor, which involve the syntax-semantics interface. The results show that Japanese speakers can acquire the canonical OSV interpretation; but they have difficulties in accessing prominence to distinguish the acceptable SOV interpretation from the unacceptable one.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical accounts on the agent role assignment in Chinese and Japanese NP1NP2V
  • 3.Previous studies on L2 acquisition of Chinese NP1NP2V
  • 4.Empirical study
    • 4.1Research questions
    • 4.2Methodology
      • 4.2.1Participants
      • 4.2.2Materials and procedure
    • 4.3Results
      • 4.3.1Methods of data analysis
      • 4.3.2Analysis in terms of proficiency groups
        • Results on the agent selection task
        • Results on the sentence judgment task
      • 4.3.3Analysis in terms of word order groups
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1In support of Version 1 of the Interface Hypothesis
    • 5.2Learners rigidify Chinese OSV order
    • 5.3Learners rely on animacy (semantic compatibility)
    • 5.4Some unexpected responses
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.15.12zen
References (25)
References
Bates, Elizabeth and Brian MacWhinney. 1981. Second-language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic, and perceptual strategies. In Harris Winitz (ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences conference on native language and foreign language acquisition, 190–214. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In Brian MacWhinney and Elizabeth Bates (eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. 3-76 New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, Laurent and Jon C. Hathorn. 2005. Quelque chose ... de remarquable in English-French acquisition: mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation. Second Language Acquisition 21, 291-323.Google Scholar
Gass, Susan. 1987. The resolution of conflicts among competing systems: A bidirectional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics 8, 329–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro and Theodoros Marinis. 2007. Acquiring phenomena at the syntax/semantics interface in L2 Spanish: The personal preposition a. In Leah Roberts, Ayşe Gürel, Sibel Tatar and Leyla Martí (eds.), Eurosla yearbook 7, 67–87. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hu, Jian H. and Pan, Hai H.. 2002. NP xianzhuxing jisuan yu hanyu fanshendaici “ziji” de zhicheng. [NP prominence computation and the reference resolution of ziji]. Contemporary Linguistics 4(1), 46–60.Google Scholar
Hu, Jian H. 2010. Lunyuan de fenbu yu xuanze: Yufa zhong de xianzhuxing he jubuxing. [The distribution and selection of arguments: Prominence and locality condition in grammar]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1, 3–20.Google Scholar
Ito, Takehiko. 1984. Universal and particular in sentence processing strategies in monolinguals, bilinguals, and second language learners: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished manuscript, Wako University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Kilborn, Kerry and Takehiko Ito. 1989. Sentence processing strategies in adult bilinguals. In Brian MacWhinney and Elizabeth Bates (eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 257–291. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson, 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Hua, Elizabeth Bates and Ping Li. 1992. Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics 13, 451–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miao, Xiao C. 1981. Word order and semantic strategies in Chinese sentence comprehension. International Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8, 23–33.Google Scholar
Pan, Hai H. 1997. Constraints on reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Sasaki, Yoshinori. 1991. English and Japanese interlanguage comprehension strategies: An analysis based on the competition model. Applied Psycholinguistics 12, 47–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Paths of processing strategy transfers in learning Japanese and English as foreign languages: A Competition Model Approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 43–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, Yoshinori and Brian MacWhinney. 2006. The competition model. In Ping Li (Series ed.) & Mineharu Nakayama, Reiko Mazuka and Yasuhiro Shirai (Vol. ed.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. II. Japanese, 307–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella. 2005. Selective optionality in language development. In Leonie Cornips and Karen P. Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social, 55–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Interfaces in L2 development. In Adriana Belletti, Elisa Bennati, Cristiano Chesi, Elisa D. Domenico and Ida Ferrari (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2005, 505–521. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Chao F. and Talmy Givón. 1985. On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language 61(2), 329–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi and Antonella Sorace. 2006. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In David Bamman, Tatiana Magnitskaia and Colleen Zaller (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual BUCLD, 653–664. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
White, Lydia. 2008. Definiteness effects in the L2 English of Mandarin and Turkish speakers. In Harvey Chan, Heather Jacob and Enkeleida Kapia (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University conference on language development, 550–561. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Changing perspectives on Universal Grammar and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Second Language 8, 3–23.Google Scholar
White, Lydia, Alyona Belikova, Paul Hagstrom, Tanja Kupisch and Öner Özcelik. 2012. Restrictions on definiteness in second language acquisition: Affirmative and negative existentials in the L2 English of Turkish and Russian speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(1), 54–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia. 2011. Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua 121, 577–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Bo P. 2010. Domain-wide or variable-dependent vulnerability of the semantics-syntax interface in L2 acquisition? Evidence from wh-words used as existential polarity words in L2 Chinese grammars. Second Language Research 26, 219–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar