Cover not available
Part of
A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives
Edited by Phoevos Panagiotidis and Moreno Mitrović
[Language Faculty and Beyond 17] 2022
► pp. 73–120

Adjectives, case and concord

| Stony Brook University
Article outline
  • 1Concord in grammatical theory
    • 1.1Classical A-chains
    • 1.2Features as chains
    • 1.3Features, case and concord
    • 1.4A visual analogy
    • 1.5"Lighting problems" – Core cases in DP
  • 2Case – Category mapping
    • 2.1"Transparent" Ns
    • 2.2"Opaque" As
  • 3Ezafe in Iranian languages
    • 3.1Ezafe in Iranian Persian
    • 3.2Ezafe as a case-marker
    • 3.3iPersian adjectives are not nouns
  • 4"Reverse Ezafe" in Caspian languages
    • 4.1The analysis of Reverse Ezafe
    • 4.2-ez/-rez and relative clauses
  • 5Case concord in VP?
    • 5.1Kinande "linkers"
    • 5.2Baker and Collins (2006)
    • 5.3Linkers as concordializers
    • 5.4Kinande "subnominals"
  • 6Closing thoughts
    • 6.1Case and category
    • 6.2Case and visibility
  • Notes
  • References
  • Acknowledgments
Published online: 24 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.17.03lar
References (87)
References
Adger, David 2003 Core syntax: a minimalist approach. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph 1979. On government, case-marking, and clitic placement. Unpublished ms. MIT.
Baker, Mark 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2012. On the relationship of object agreement and accusative case: evidence from Amharic. Linguistic Inquiry 43. 255–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Case: Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark and Chris, Collins. 2006. Linkers and the internal structure of vP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24. 307–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. and Nadya Vinokurova. 2010. Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28. 593–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béjar, Susana 2003. Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.
2008. Conditions on phi-agree. In Daniel, Harbour, David, Adger and Susana, Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, 130–154, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Béjar, Susana and Milan, Rezac. 2009. Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 35–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennis, Hans 1986. Gaps and dummies. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bošković, želko and T., Messick. in press. Derivational economy in syntax and semantics. In Mark, Aronoff (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press, New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brattico, Pauli 2011. Case assignment, case concord, and the quantificational case construction. Lingua 121. 1042–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Ash, Asudeh, Ida Toivonen and Stephen Wechsler. 2015. Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstens, Vicki 1993a. Deriving agreement. ms., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
1993b. Deriving variation in agreement systems. Presented at the 24th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
2000. Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 319–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against φ-(in)completeness. Syntax 4. 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1972. The Amherst lectures. Unpublished ms. MIT.
1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Robert, Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, 417–454, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Ken, Hale and Samuel J., Keyser (eds.) The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1–52, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael, Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville 1987. The morphology/syntax interface: evidence from possessive adjectives in Slavonic. Language 63. 299–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Danon, Gabi 2011. Agreement and DP-internal feature distribution. Syntax 14. 297–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel 2006. Relators and linkers: a study of predication, predicate inversion and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel and Pornsiri, Singhapreecha. 2004. Complex noun phrases and linkers. Syntax 7. 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel 2014. On feature interpretability and inheritance. In Peter, Kosta, Steven, Franks, Teodora, Radeva-Bork and Lilia, Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond. Radicalizing the interfaces, 37–55, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frampton, John and Samuel, Gutmann. 2006. How sentences grow in the mind: Agreement and selection in an efficient minimalist syntax. In Cedric, Boeckx (ed.), Agreement systems, 121–157, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, Ludovico, M., Rita Manzini and Leonardo, Savoia. 2015. Linkers and agreement. The Linguistic Review 32. 277–332.Google Scholar
Graf, Thomas 2013. Local and transderivational constraints in syntax and semantics. PhD thesis. UCLA.
Grimm, Scott 2011. Semantics of case. Morphology 21. 515–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey 2011. Linker, relativizer, nominalizer, tense-particle: on the Ezafe in West Iranian. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen, Grunow-Hårsta, and Janick, Wrona, (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: diachronic and typological perspectives, 363–390, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Homayunfarrokh, A.R. 1339/1960. Dæstur-e Jame’-e Zæban-e Farsi [A contemporary grammar of the Persian language]. 2nd ed. Tehran.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman 1936. Contribution to the general theory of case: General meanings of the Russian cases. In Lynn, Waugh (ed.), Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies 1931-1981. 59–103. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan 2014. Revisiting the Persian Ezafe construction: A roll-up movement analysis. Lingua 150. 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karimi, Simin and Michael, Brame. 1986/2012. A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian. Linguistic Analysis 38. 111–143.Google Scholar
Karimi, Yadgar 2007. Kurdish Ezafe construction: implications for DP structure. Lingua 117. 2159–2177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kester, Ellen-Petra 1996. The nature of adjectival inflection. Utrecht: OTS.Google Scholar
Kimball, John 1973. The grammar of existence. In Claudia, Corum, T., Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann, Weiser (eds.), Papers from the regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 9, 262–270, Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth 2009. Definite markers, phi-features, and agreement: a morphosyntactic investigation of the Amharic DP. Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Santa Cruz.
Lamarche, Jacques 1991. Problems for N-movement to NumP. Probus 3. 215–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard 1989. Light predicate raising. MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers No. 27. In Larson 2014, 303–366.Google Scholar
2008. Linker constructions and genitives. Lecture # 5 at the LOT Winter School. Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
2014. On shell structure. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. On "dative idioms" in English. Linguistic Inquiry 48. 389–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019-2020. The DP Hypothesis and (a)symmetries between DP and CP. Linguistic Analysis 42. 507–547.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard and Vida, Samiian. 2020a. The Ezafe construction revisited. In Richard, Larson, Sedighe, Moradi and Vida Samiian (eds.), Advances in Iranian linguistics. 173–236, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. Ezafe, PP and the nature of nominalization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 39. 157–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard and Hiroko, Yamakido. 2008. Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In L., McNally and C., Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: syntax, semantics and discourse, 43–70, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard 1992. Case and expletives: Notes toward a parametric account. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 381–405.Google Scholar
1995. Case and expletives revisited: on greed and other human failings. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 615–633.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert 1957. Grammarire du Persian contemporain. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Ann 2005. Phases and cyclic agreement. In Martha, McGinnis and Norvin, Richards (eds.), Perspectives on phases (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49), 147–156, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard 1983. The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice theoretic approach. In Rainer, Bäuerle, Christian, Schwarze and Arnim von, Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, 302–323, Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lötzsch, Ronald 1965. Das sog. Possessivadjektiv im Slawischen, speziell im Sorbischen, und seine Stellung im System der Redeteile. Forschungen und Fortschritte 39. 377–379.Google Scholar
Mallen, Enrique 1997. A minimalist approach to concord in noun phrases. Theoretical Linguistics 23. 49–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec 1991. Case and licensing. In German, Westphal, Benjamin, Ao and Hee-Rahk, Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8), 234–253, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
1993. Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions, in Sam, Mchombo (ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, 113–150, CSLI: Stanford.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas 2004. The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study on the syntax-morphology interface. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PhD thesis.
Norris, Mark 2014. A theory of nominal concord. Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Santa Cruz.
Palmer, Adrian 1971. The Ezafe construction in Modern Standard Persian. Ph.D. thesis. University of Michigan.
Parsafar, Parviz 2010. Syntax, morphology and semantics of Ezafe. Iranian Studies 43. 637–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David and Esther, Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin, Karimi, Vida, Samiian and Wendy, Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture, 262–294, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillot, D.C. 1919. Higher Persian grammar. Calcutta. Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl and Ivan, Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul and Geoffrey, Pullum. 1988. Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 635–670.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey and Deirdre, Wilson. 1977. Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Language 53. 741–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastorgueva, V., Kerimova, A., Mamedzade, A., Pireiko, L., Edel’man, D. & Ronald, Lockwood. 1971/2012. The Gilaki language. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth 1988. A Head-movement approach to construct-state noun phrases. Linguistics 26. 909–929. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, Alain and Jean-Roger, Vergnaud. 1980. Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 97–202.Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas 1989. Weather-verbs and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Carl, Kirschner and Janet Ann, DeCesaris (eds.), Studies in Romance Linguistics: Selected Proceedings from the XVII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 313–345, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samiian, Vida 1994. The Ezafe construction: some implications for the theory of X-bar syntax. In Mehdi, Marashi (ed.), Persian studies in North America, 17–41, Betheda, MD: Iranbooks.Google Scholar
Samiian, Vida and Richard, Larson. Forthcoming. Middle Persian Ezafe. In Simin, Karimi, Narges, Nematollahi, Roya, Kabiri and Jian Gan, Ngui (eds.), Advances in Iranian linguistics 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Samvelian, Pollet 2007. A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe. J. Linguistics 43. 605–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. The Ezafe as a head-marking inflectional affix: evidence from Persian and Kurmanji Kurdish. In Simin, Karimi, Vida, Samiian and Donald, Stilo (eds.), Aspects of Iranian Linguistics, 339–361. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald L. 2010. Ditransitive constructions in Vafsi: A corpus-based study. In Andrej, Malchukov, Martin, Haspelmath and Bernard, Comrie, (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, 243–76, Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. The Caspian region and south Azerbaijan: Caspian and Tatic. In Geoffrey, Haig and Geoffrey, Khan (eds.), The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia. An Areal Perspective, 659–824, Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Timothy 1983. Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. thesis. MIT.
Toosarvandi, Maziar and Coppe van, Urk. 2014. The syntax of nominal concord: what Ezafe in Zazaki shows us. In Hsin-Lung, Huang, Ethan, Poole and Amanda, Rysling (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, 43. 209–220.Google Scholar
Tortora, Christina 1997. The semantics of the weak locative. Ph.D. thesis. University of Delaware.
Zeijlstra, Hedde 2014. On the uninterpretability of interpretable features. In Peter, Kosta, Steven, Franks, Teodora, Radeva-Bork and Lilia, Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond. Radicalizing the interfaces, 109–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter 1991. Expletive raising and expletive replacement in Dutch. In German, Westphal, Benjamin, Ao and Hee-Rahk, Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8). 393–404. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar