Cover not available
Part of
A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives
Edited by Phoevos Panagiotidis and Moreno Mitrović
[Language Faculty and Beyond 17] 2022
► pp. 155–186

Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in Ògè

This paper examines the syntax of adjectives in the Ògè language and argues that attributive adjectives in Ògè are nominal. Attributive adjectives are called Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in this work. Adopting the notion of dependent and independent features as introduced in Zeijlstra (2020), this paper shows that the grammaticality of NAM depends on the modified noun in attributive expressions in Ògè. For NAMs that are not in a local relationship with the modified noun, evidence is given to show that such expressions are genitives or possessives. Accordingly, I analyze NAM as adjuncts in modification expressions. Finally, I show that the adjunct (NAM) is involved in feature checking which further contributes to the label ‘[N]’ for the concatenation of a NAM with a Noun.
Keywords: nominal, attributive, predicative, adjunct, genitives, modifier, Ògè, independent, dependent, features
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Internal syntax of NAMs in Ògè
    • 2.1Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in Ògè
      • 2.1.1í-NAMs in Ògè
      • 2.1.2Nominalizations in Ògè
      • 2.1.3Internal structure of í-NAMs
    • 2.2Verbal status of predicative forms in Ògè
  • 3.Implications of the analysis
  • 4.External syntax of NAMs
    • 4.1NAMs in argument positions
    • 4.2Adjunction analysis of attributive adjectives
      • 4.2.1Optionality of NAMs in attributive positions
      • 4.2.2Problems with the label of adjuncts in the Minimalist Program
      • 4.2.3Problems of the traditional analysis of adjuncts for NAMs
      • 4.2.4Zeijlstra (2020)
  • 4.3NAMs are dependent on the modified noun
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.17.05ade
References (37)
References
Abney, Steven 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph. D. dissertation, MIT,Cambridge, MA.
Adénúgà, Priscilla Lola 2017. Negation in Ògè. Alore: Journal of the Humanities, University of Ilorin, Kwara State. Nigeria.Google Scholar
Adger, David 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach (Vol. 33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artmis 2010. Nominalisations: A probe into the architecture of grammar Part 1: The nominalization puzzle. Language & Linguistics compass, 4(7). 496–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aljovic, Nadira 2010. Syntactic positions of attributive adjectives. In Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo & Ora, Matushansky (eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, 29–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/senc/detail.action?docID=623315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Judy 1991. DPs in French and Walloon: Evidence for parametric variation in nominal head movement. Probus 2, 1–26.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Picallo, Carme. 1996. Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of linguistics 32(2), 349–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin 2010. Ditransitive asymmetries and a theory of idiom formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(4), 519–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina. 2010. On labeling: Principle c and head movement. Syntax 13:241–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1970. Remarks on Nominalization. In R.A., Rosenbaum (Ed.), Readings in Transformational Grammar 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
1975. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris ChomskyLectures on Government and Binding.Google Scholar
1986. Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin, and use. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
1994. Bare phrase structure, Vol. 8. MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995. The Minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995. Bare phrase structure. In Gert., Webelhuth (eds.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program, 383–439. Massachusetts. Basil Blackwell Inc.Google Scholar
2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. In Roger, Martin, David, Michaels, & Juan, Uriagereka (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo 1994. On the evidence of partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Guglielmo C, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves, Pollock, Luigi, Rizzi (eds.). Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne., 85–110. Washington, DC: Georgetown Press.Google Scholar
1995. Italian syntax and universal grammar. No. 77. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2010. The Syntax of Adjectives. A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. The Semantic Classification of Adjectives. A View from Syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris 2002. Eliminating labels. In S.D., Epstein & T.D., Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 45–61. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Breheny, Richard. 1994. Projections for Functional Categories. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 35–61.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Marantz, Alec. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry, 39, 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio 2008. A two sources for nominal features in Spanish Nominalizations.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert 2009. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec 2001. Words: Paper presented at WCCFL XX, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Seely, T. Daniel 2006. Merge, derivational c-command, and subcategorization. In C., Boeckx (eds.), Minimalist essays, 182–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurodsson, Halldór. Á. 1993. The structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica, 47(2), 177–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique 1994. Adjuncts and Adjunction. Glow Newsletter 32: 54–55.Google Scholar
1995. Clitic constructions. Phrase structure and the lexicon. In Johan, Rooryck and Laurie, Zaring (eds.), 213–276. Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert 2016. Labeling in Syntax. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 9, 130–155.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter 1993. Selection, Adjunction, and Concord in the DP. Studia Linguistica 47 (2), 198–220. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 49.95–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. ‘the structural location of the attributive adjective’. In E., Duncan,D., Farkas, and P., Spaelti (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford, pp.439–454. CSLI.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedzer 2014. On the uninterpretability of interpretable features In P., Kosta, S., Franks, T., Radeva-Bork & L., Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond, 109–129. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Labelling, selection and feature checking. In Smith, P. W., Mursell, J., & Hartmann, K. (Eds.) Agree to Agree: Agreement in the Minimalist Programme (Open Generative Syntax 6). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar