Chapter in:
A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives
Edited by Phoevos Panagiotidis and Moreno Mitrović
[Language Faculty and Beyond 17] 2022
► pp. 257292
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis
2006Disjunction in alternative semantics: UMass Amherst dissertation.
Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins
2012Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Springer.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon
1986The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(1). 5–16.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
2003Lexical categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, R. & T. Vennemann
1972The grammar of relative adjectives and comparison. Linguistische Berichte 20. 19–32.Google Scholar
Bassi, Itai
2021Fake Features and Valuation From Context: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Bobaljik, J. D.
2012Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bochnak, M. Ryan
2015The Degree Semantics Parameter and cross-linguistic variation. Semantics and Pragmatics 8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2013Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Margit
2016The status of degrees in Warlpiri. In Mira Grubic & Anne Mucha (eds.), Proceedings of The Semantics of African, Asian and Austronesian Languages, 1–17. Potsdam: Universitatsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg N.
1989On the Semantic Composition of English Generic Sentences. In Properties, Types and Meaning, 167–192. Springer Netherlands. Crossref.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf
1931Überwindung der Metaphysik durch Logische Analyse der Sprache. Erkenntnis 2. 219–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language. In Alfred Jules Ayer (ed.), Logical positivism The Library of Philosophical Movements, chap. 3, 60–81. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1984Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.
1989Introduction. In Properties, Types and Meaning, 1–20. Springer Netherlands. Crossref.Google Scholar
2013Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice and Intervention Oxford studies in semantics and pragmatics 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. g6sm. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & Raymond Turner
1988Semantics and property theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 11. 261–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on Nominalization. In Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA.: Ginn.Google Scholar
2013Problems of Projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, M.J.
1976The Semantics of Degree. In Barbara Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, 261–292. Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1989On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’. In Properties, Types and Meaning, 69–129. Springer Netherlands. Crossref.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2010Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021The Motivation for Roots in Distributed Morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics 7(1). 69–88. Crossref.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Alec Marantz
2008Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 1–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
1999Locality in Post-Syntactic Operations. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 34. 265–317.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf, Noyer
2001Movement operations after Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 555–595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fălăuş, Anamaria
2013Introduction: Alternatives in semantics and pragmatics. In Anamaria, Fălăuş (ed.), Alternatives in Semantics, 1–35. London: Palgrave Macmilan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feferman, Solomon
2015A simpler property theory for natural language semantics. Unpublished Ms. Stanford University.
Fox, Danny & Roni Katzir
2011On the Characterization of Alternatives Natural Language Semantics 19. 87–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gotzner, Nicole
2017Alternative Sets in Language Processing. How Focus Alternatives are Represented in the Mind. London: Palgrave Macmilan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec, Marantz
1994Some key features of Distributed Morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 275–288.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L.
1973Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10(1). 41–53.Google Scholar
Hansen, Nat & Emmanuel Chemla
2017Color adjectives, standards, and thresholds: an experimental investigation. Linguistics and Philosophy 40(3). 239–278. Crossref.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene
1985Notes on comparatives and related matters. University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer
1998Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars
1981Towards an integrated analysis of comparatives. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Katzir, Roni
2007Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30. 669–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R.
2005Movement and Silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher
1999Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
2007Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Irene Heim
200224.979 Topics in Semantics. Fall 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourse-Ware.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally
2005Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates. Language 81(2). 345–381. Crossref.Google Scholar
Klein, E.
1991Comparatives. In Arnim von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein Internationales Handbuch der Zeitgenössischen Forschung, 673–691. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew & John Beavers
2017Change of State Verbs and the Semantics of Roots. In Cole Brendel, Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda McCarvel, Jeff Pynes & Ed, Rubin (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project In press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimoyama
2002Indeterminate Phrases: the View from Japanese. In Yokio Otsu (ed.), The Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 1–25. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Link, Godehard
1983The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 302–323. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
M., Bierwisch
1989The Semantics of gradation. In Bierwisch M. & Lang E. (eds.), Dimensional adjectives, 71–261. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitrović, Moreno
2021Superparticles: A Microsemantic Theory, Typology, and History of Logical Atoms (Studies in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 98). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitrović, Moreno & Phoevos Panagiotidis
2020Adjectives exist, adjectivisers do not: a bicategorial typology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1)(58). 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitrović, Moreno & Uli Sauerland
2016Two conjunctions are better than one. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63(4). 471–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard
1970aEnglish as a Formal Language. In Bruno Visentini (ed.), Linguaggi nella Società e nella Tecnica, 188–221. Milan: Edizioni di Communita.Google Scholar
1970bUnviersal grammar. Theoria 36. 373–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcisk & P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, 221–242. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos
2011Categorial Features and Categorizers. The Linguistic Review 28. 325–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Categorial Features: A Generative Theory of Word Class Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H., Alice ter Meulen & Robert Wall
1990Mathematical Methods in Lingusitics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2021Natural language without semiosis. Paper presented at various venues. Unpublished manuscript. University of Maryland.
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica
2007Antonymy and Evaluativity. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 17. 210. Crossref.Google Scholar
Roberts, I.G.
2010Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985Association with Focus: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.
Russell, Bertrand
1903The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1908Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types,. American Journal of Mathematics 30. 222–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M.
1973The Comparative. In Generative Grammar in Europe, 528–564. Springer Netherlands. Crossref.Google Scholar
Shimada, Junri
2007Head Movement, Binding Theory, and Phrase Structure. Ms. MIT.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2009Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd 36(1). 1–6.Google Scholar
Sudo, Yasutada
2012On the semantics of phi features on pronouns: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Szabolcsi, Anna
2010Quantification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tieu, Lyn, Jacopo Romoli, Peng Zhou & Stephen Crain
2015Children’s Knowledge of Free Choice Inferences and Scalar Implicatures. Journal of Semantics 33(2). 269–298. Crossref.Google Scholar
Von Stechow, Arnim
1984Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3(1-2). 1–77. Crossref.Google Scholar
Wellwood, Alexis, Susan J. Hespos & Lance J. Rips
2018The Object : Substance :: Event : Process Analogy. In Tania Lombrozo, Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, 183–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.Google Scholar