Cover not available
Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 44:1 (2021) ► pp.101–136

Minimodel of semantic synthesis of Russian sentences

 | Observatoire de linguistique Sens-Texte, Université de Montréal
 | Observatoire de linguistique Sens-Texte, Université de Montréal
A formal linguistitic model is presented, which produces, for a given conceptual representation of an extralinguistic situation, a corresponding semantic representation [SemR] that, in its turn, underlies the deep-syntactic representations of four near-synonymous Russian sentences expressing the starting information. Two full-fledged lexical entries are given for the lexemes besporjadki ‘disturbance’ and stolknovenie ‘clash(N)’, appearing in these sentences. Some principles of lexicalization – that is, matching the formal lexicographic definitions to the starting semantic representation in order to produce the deep-syntactic structures of the corresponding sentences – are formulated and illustrated; the problem of approximate matching is dealt with in sufficient detail.
Keywords: NLP, semantic synthesis, semantic representation, semantic matching, deep-syntactic representation, lexical entries of the Explanatory Combinatorial Dictionary, Russian
Article outline
  • 1.Stating the problem
  • 2.The starting conceptual representation
  • 3.A fragment of the “Concepts Semantemes” dictionary for Russian
  • 4.A starting Russian semantic representation
  • 5.Lexical entries of two Russian lexemes: besporjadki ‘disturbance’ and stolknovenie ‘clash(N)’
    • 5.1Besporjadki ‘disturbance’
      • 5.1.1Lexical entry of besporjadki ‘disturbance’
      • 5.1.2Comments on the lexical entry of besporjadki ‘disturbance’
        • ① Individualization of the lexeme besporjadki
        • ② Generic component of the semanteme ‘besporjadki = disturbance’
        • ③ Disjunctions in the definition of the lexeme besporjadki
        • ④ Split actantial variables Z1 and Z2 in the definition of the lexeme besporjadki
        • ⑤ The semantic components ‘odnovremenno = simultaneously’ and ‘v odnom meste = in one spot’
        • ➅ Actant ‘Х’ I of the lexeme besporjadki
    • 5.2Stolknovenie ‘clash(N)’
      • 5.2.1Lexical entry of stolknovenie ‘clash(N)’
      • 5.2.2Comments on the lexical entry of stolknovenie ‘clash’
        • ①Generic component of the lexicographic definition of the lexeme stolknovenie ‘clash(N)’: ‘konfliktii.2 = conflictii.2’
        • ② Split actantial variables Z1 and Z2 in the definition of the lexeme stolknovenie
        • ③ Lexical functions with a key noun in the plural
    • 5.3Comparison of the semantemes ‘besporjadki = disturbance’ and ‘stolknovenie = clash’
  • 6.Transition from SemR (5) to the DSynt-representations of sentences (2) and (3)
    • 6.1Transition from the Sem-structure in (5) to the DSynt-structures of sentences (2) and (3)
    • 6.2Lexicalization principles
    • 6.3Constructing the DSynt-structure of sentence (2а) (besporjadki priveli k gibeli)
    • 6.4Constructing the DSynt-structure of sentence (3а) (v rezulʹtate besporjadkov pogibli)
    • 6.5Constructing the DSynt-structure of sentence (2b) (stolknovenija priveli k gibeli)
    • 6.6Constructing the DSynt-structure of sentence (3b) (v rezulʹtate stolknovenij pogibli)
    • 6.7Filtering out wrong lexicalizations
  • 7.Additional principles for the partial matchings of lexicographic definitions to the SemR
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00058.Ior
References (15)
References
Dobrovolʹskij, D. & Pöppel, L. 2013. Lexical Synonymy within the Semantic Field POWER. In: Kor Chanine, I., (ed.), Current Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 281–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iordanskaja, L. 1990. Ot semantičeskoj seti k glubinno-sintaksičeskomu derevu: pravila naxoždenija veršiny dereva [From a Semantic Network to a Deep-syntactic Tree: Rules for the Determination of the Tree Top Node]. In Saloni, Z. (ed.), Metody formalne w opisie języków słowiańskich [Festschrift Ju. Apresjan], Białystok: Filija Uniwersyteta Warszawskiego w Białymstoku, 33–46.Google Scholar
Iordanskaja, L. & Polguère, A. 1988. Semantic Processing for Text Generation. In Proceedings of International Computer Science Conference ’88, Hong Kong, 310–318.Google Scholar
Lareau, F., Lambrey, F., Dubinskaitė, I., Galarreta-Piquette, D. & Nejat, M. 2018. GenDR: A Generic Deep Realizer with Complex Lexicalization. In: Proceedings of the 11th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Miyazaki (Japan), European Language Resources Association, 3018–3025.Google Scholar
Lareau, F. & Wanner, L. 2007. Towards a Generic Multilingual Dependency Grammar for Text Generation. In Holloway King, T. & Bender, E. M. (eds), Proceedings of the Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks 2007 Workshop [CSLI Publications, [URL]], 203–223.
2012–2015. Semantics. From Meaning to Text. Vols 1–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Language: From Meaning to Text. Moskva/Boston: Academic Studies Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I. & Polguère, A. 2018. Theory and Practice of Lexicographic Definition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 19: 4, 417–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milićević, J. 2007a. La paraphrase. Modélisation de la paraphrase langagière. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2007b. Semantic Equivalence Rules in Meaning-Text Paraphrasing. In: Wanner, L., ed., Selected Lexical and Grammatical Issues in Meaning-Text Theory, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 267–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021. Modélisation de la paraphrase sémantique approximative. In: Marengo, S., dir., La Théorie Sens-Texte. Concepts-clés et applications, coll. « Dixit Grammatica », Paris: L’Harmattan, 51–74.Google Scholar
Polguère, A. 1990. Structuration et mise en jeu procédurale d’un modèle linguistique décla-ratif dans un cadre de génération de texte. Montréal: Université de Montréal [thèse de doctorat].Google Scholar
Sowa, J. F. 1976. Conceptual Graphs for a Data Base Interface. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 20: 4, 336–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.