Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 47:1 (2024) ► pp.129
References (21)
References
Apresjan, J. (1971). O reguljarnoj mnogoznačnosti [On regular polysemy]. Izvestija AN SSSR. Serija Literatury i Jazyka, 30(6). 509–523.Google Scholar
(1974a). Leksičeskaja semantika. Sinonimečeskie sredstva jazyka [Lexical semantics. Synonymic means of language]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
(1974b). Regular polysemy. Linguistics, 12 (No. 142), 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, D. (2016). The typology of morphological processes: Form and function. In A. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Typology, 325–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleiber, G. (1995). Polysémie, transferts de sens et métonymie intégrée. Folia Linguistica, 29(1–2), 105–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I. (1993–2000). Cours de morphologie générale. Vols 1–51. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal — Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
(2006). Aspects of the Theory of Morphology. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2012–2015). Semantics: From Meaning to Text. Vols 1–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2016). Language: From Meaning to Text. Moskva/Boston: Academic Studies Press.Google Scholar
(2018). “Wordlets”: One of Zholkovsky’s major contributions to the notion of deep-syntactic structure. In D. Ioffe, M. Levitt, J. Peschio & I. Pilshchikov (Eds.), A/Z: Essays in honor of Alexander Zholkovsky, 350–360. Boston: Academic Studies Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Ten studies in dependency syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). General phraseology: Theory and practice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2024). The Russian reduplicative construction of the gudit-gudit ‘It rumbles-rumbles’ type: A syntactic idiom. In M. Kopotev & K. Kwon, (Eds.), Constructions with lexical repetitions in East Slavic, 97–127. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I. & Milićević, J. (2020). An advanced introduction to semantics. A Meaning-Text approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, G. (1995). Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics, 121, 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, G. & Zaenen, A. (1992). Systematic polysemy in lexicology and lexicography. In H. Tommola, K. Varantola, T. Salmi-Tolonen & J. Schopp (Eds.), Euralex ’92, 387–396. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U. & Radden, G. (Eds.) (1999). Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percova, N. (1988). Formalizacija tolkovanija slova [Formalization of lexicographic definitions]. Moskva: Izdatelʹstvo MGU.Google Scholar
Polguère, A. (2018). A lexicographic approach to the study of copolysemy relations. Rus-sian Journal of Linguistics, 22(4), 788–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1991). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ward, G. (2004). Equatives and deferred reference. Language, 80(2), 262–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar