2020. Antipassives in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Marini, Emanuela
2014. L'opposition actif vs. déponent et la persistance du moyen en latin. Langages N° 194:2 ► pp. 49 ff.
Loporcaro, Michele
2007. On triple auxiliation in Romance. Linguistics 45:1
LAKA, ITZIAR
2006. Deriving Split Ergativity in the Progressive. In ERGATIVITY [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 65], ► pp. 173 ff.
Nouguier Voisin, Sylvie
2006. Antipassif et langues accusatives. In Linguistique typologique, ► pp. 193 ff.
Watanabe, Akira
1996. WH-Agreement. In Case Absorption and WH-Agreement [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 37], ► pp. 170 ff.
Davies, William D.
1995. Javanese adversatives, passives and Mapping Theory. Journal of Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Wilkinson, Edwin M.
1987. Review article. Australian Journal of Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Böhm, Roger
1986. Indirect object advancement: From relational to case grammar (via Kalkatungu)∗. Australian Journal of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Gibson, Jeanne & Eduardo Raposo
1986. Clause union, the stratal uniqueness law and the ch�meur relation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4:3 ► pp. 295 ff.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1985. Multiple uses of reciprocal constructions. Australian Journal of Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Anderson, Stephen R.
1984. On representations in morphology case, agreement and inversion in Georgian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Perlmutter, David M.
1982. Syntactic Representation, Syntactic Levels, and the Notion of Subject. In The Nature of Syntactic Representation, ► pp. 283 ff.
[no author supplied]
1986. References. In Linguistic Theory in America, ► pp. 231 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.