We explore in this article the syntactic criteria used to classify most French connectors. We have defined three main classes:
- the first main class contains subordinating conjunctions (Conjs) subdivided into eight subclasses corresponding to various syntactic-semantic properties;
- the second main class contains coordinating conjunctions (Conjco);
- the third main class contains coordinating adverbs (Advconj); several syntactic criteria have been used to divide this class into two major subclasses.
The use of formal criteria has allowed us to classify connectors on a more precise basis; one consequence is that some connectors are not classified in their traditional classes.
Our study has brought to light interesting linguistic phenomena such as new relations between several subordinating and coordinating conjunctions.
2015. À peine avaient-ils introduit une inversion dans leur énoncé que la subordination s'imposa : subordination inverse et inversion subordonnante ?. Langages N° 200:4 ► pp. 31 ff.
Lafontaine, Fanny
2012. Quelques apports sur le traitement syntaxique de la forme « alors que ». TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :28
Bikialo, Stéphane
2009. Est-ce bien sérieux ? Dialogisme et modalisation pseudo-objective. Langue française n° 163:3 ► pp. 137 ff.
Mouret, François & Marianne Desmets
2008. Analogie et coordination en comme. Linx :58 ► pp. 75 ff.
Adler, Silvia
2007. ‘Aller sans mais se sentir avec’ : emplois absolus non-innocents de avec et sans. Semiotica 2007:166
Godard, Danièle
2005. Problèmes syntaxiques de la coordination et propositions récentes dans les grammaires syntagmatiques. Langages n° 160:4 ► pp. 3 ff.
Lamiroy, Béatrice & Michel Charolles
2005. Simplement, seulement, malheureusement, heureusement. Travaux de linguistique n o 49:2 ► pp. 57 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.