The objective of this study was to attempt to distinguish the various processes of producing SMS spelling forms. The production of these different spelling forms was compared by means of an experimental paradigm: the dual task. This paradigm aimed at identifying the attentional resources necessary for the process of producing SMS spelling. Another way in which to address the degree of automation of these production processes was to compare SMS productions in terms of the level of SMS writing expertise. The results of this study demonstrated that the spelling forms produced in SMS language (eSMS), and therefore their production process, differ according to the degree of SMS writing expertise and the attention that the participants are able to devote to the SMS writing task. The results confirm that SMS writing represents a cognitive cost for novice texters and tends to become automatic as the users acquire expertise.
2022. A little doubt saves many mistakes: Early and late error detection in copy-typing. Open Psychology 4:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Goumi, A. & M. Besançon
2019. 2 B kreativ’ or not to be creative: Textisms and texters’ creativity. European Review of Applied Psychology 69:4 ► pp. 100470 ff.
Combes, Céline, Olga Volckaert-Legrier & Cyril Perret
2018. Écrire des SMS, quels effets sur les modules cognitifs de production ?. L’Année psychologique Vol. 118:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Walsh, Erin & Jay K Brinker
2016. Short and Sweet? Length and Informative Content of Open-Ended Responses Using SMS as a Research Mode. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
2015. Focus on Text Messages: A Review of Studies in French. In Encyclopedia of Mobile Phone Behavior, ► pp. 1037 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.