Article published in:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 37:1 (2014) ► pp. 156180
Références

Références

Acedo-Matellán, V.
(2010) Argument structure and the syntax-lexicon interface. Thèse de doctorat. U. de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Aske, J.
(1989) Path predicates in English and Spanish : A closer look. Berkeley Linguistic Society Papers, 15, 1–14.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S.W.
(2010) The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46, 331–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergh, L.
(1940) L’idée de direction exprimée par un adverbe ou par une préposition en suedois, par un verbe et une préposition en français. Studia Neophilologica, 12, 66–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buridant, C.
2000Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: Sedes.Google Scholar
Burnett, H., & Tremblay, M.
(2009) Variable-behaviour Ps and the location of PATH in Old French. In E. Aboh, E. van der Linden, J. Quer, & P. Sleeman (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2007 (pp. 25–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, H., & Troberg, M.
(2013) Changes at the syntax-semantics interface: From Latin to Modern French. Communication donnée au 15th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference, August 1-3, University of Ottawa. http://​artsites​.uottawa​.ca​/digs15​/doc​/BurnettTroberg​_handout​.pdf
Comrie, B.
(1976) Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge : Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Cummins, S.
(1996) Movement and direction in French and English. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 15(1), 31–54.Google Scholar
Davau, M.
(1949-50) Adjectifs invariables. Le français moderne, XVII, 197–210, 273–280, XVIII, 45–53.Google Scholar
Dufresne, M., Dupuis, F., & Longtin C-M.
(2001) Un changement dans la diachronie du français: La perte de la préfixation aspectuelle en –à. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 29(2), 33–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli R., & Ramchand. G.
(2005) Prepositions and results in Italian and English: An analysis from event decomposition. In: A. van Hout, H. de Swart, & H.J. Verkuyl (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect (pp. 81–106). Dordrecht : Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haverling, G.
(2003) On prefixes and actionality in Classical and Late Latin. Acta Linguistica Hungarian, 50(1-2), 113–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B.
(2011) A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion expression. A case study: From Latin to Romance. Cahiers de faits de langue, 3, 151–172.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A.
(2006) The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Continuity and change in the representation of motion events in French. In: J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Ozcaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 415–426). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Legendre, G.
(1997) Predication and functional projections in French. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15(1), 43–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, E.
(2009) On the Germanic properties of Old French. In P. Crisma, & G. Longobardi (Eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory (pp. 344–357). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, C.
(2002) Prépositions françaises en diachronie: Une catégorie en question. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 25(2), 205–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R.
(2001) Le préfixe a-/ad- en moyen français. Romania, 119, 289–322.Google Scholar
Muller, C.
(2000) Les constructions à attribut de l’object. Langue Française, 127, 21–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, D.J.
(1992) Secondary resultative predicates in Italian. Journal of Linguistics, 28, 53–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sablayrolles, J-F.
(2000) La néologie en français contemporain. Examen du concept et analyse de productions néologiques récentes. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R.
(1986) Observations on reference object geometry in Emai path expressions. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 12, 485–497.
Slobin, D.
(2004) The many ways to search for a frog. Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Volume 2 : Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Snyder, W.
(2001) Language acquisition and language variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language, 77, 324–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Son, M.
2007Directionality and resultativity: The cross-linguistic correlation revisited. Tromsø working papers on language and linguistics. Nordlyd, 4(2), 126–164.Google Scholar
Son, M., & Svenonius, P.
(2008) Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 27, 338–396.Google Scholar
Stolova, N.I.
(2008) From satellite-framed Latin verb to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. In R. Wright (Ed.), Latin vulgaire - latin tardif VIII: Actes du VIIIe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Hildesheim (pp. 253–262). Olms.Google Scholar
Svenonius, P.
(2010) Spatial P in English. In G. Cinque, & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 6 (pp. 127–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press,. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description III (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, Mass : MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tremblay, M., Dupuis, F., & Dufresne, M.
(2003) Les prépositions dans l’histoire du français: Transitivité, grammaticalisation et lexicalisation. Verbum, 25(4), 549–562.Google Scholar
Troberg, M.
(2011) Directed motion in Medieval French. In J. Herschensohn (Ed.), Romance Linguistics 2010. Selected Papers from the 40th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 117–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z.
(1957) Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 56, 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H.
(1972) On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht : Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J.
(1958) Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Didier: Paris.Google Scholar
Washio, R.
(1997) Resultatives, compositionality, and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6(1), 1–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P.
(2004) A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Volume 2 : Typological and contextual perspectives, (pp. 159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Zubizaretta, M., & Oh, E.
(2007) On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hummel, Martin
2018. La structure “verbe + adjectif”. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:2  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.