Article published in:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexicon
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 322337
References

References

Beauvillain, C.
(1996) The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye-fixation on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801–820. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, L., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A. M.
(2005) Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS). http://​linguistica​.sns​.it​/CoLFIS​/CoLFIS​_home​.htm.
Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J.
(1997) Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 268–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.
(2010) Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burani, C., & Caramazza, A.
(1987) Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 217–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burani, C., & Laudanna, A.
(1988) Relazioni morfologiche tra forme derivate e forme verbali. Giornale italiano di psicologia, XV(4), 625–639.Google Scholar
Burani, C., & Thornton, A. M.
(2003) The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words. In H. R. Baayen, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 157–208). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(1988) Morphology as lexical organization. In M. Hammond, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Theoretical morphology. Approaches to modern linguistics (pp. 119–142). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Sonnenstuhl, I., & Blevins, J. P.
(2003) Derivational morphology in the German mental lexicon: A dual mechanism account. In H. Baayen, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 125–155). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J.
(1989) On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory & Language, 28(1), 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B.
(1992) Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at conceptual representations. In R. Frost, & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 389–412). Amsterdam: North-Holland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Mauro, T.
(2000) Grande dizionario dell’uso (GRADIT). Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E.
(2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2013) Second language acquisition. In G. Trousdale, & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 365–378). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F.
(2009) Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: An exception to form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 16(4), 684–691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Kostic, A., Gvozdenovic, V., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F.
(2012) Semantic similarity influences early morphological priming in Serbian: A challenge to form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 19, 668–676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C.
(1984) Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I.
(1999) The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language, 68, 5–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Kugler, T., & Forster, K. I.
(2005) Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 1293–1326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giraudo, H., & Dal Maso, S.
(2014) The notion of entrenchment: A psycholinguistic experiment on L1 and L2 processing of morphologically complex words. Poster presented at the 2° Interannual Meeting of the Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI) on Usage-based theories and approaches in linguistics . Bolzano, 23rd-24th May 2014
Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J.
(1991) Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howell, D. C.
(2011) Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2006) Knowledge of derivational morphology in a second language idiolect. In M. G. O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 72–79). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A.
(1992) Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 333–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowie, W. M.
(1998) The acquisition of interlanguage morphology: A study into the role of morphology in the L2 learner’s mental lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
(2000) Cross-linguistic influence on morphology in the bilingual mental lexicon. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 175–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Exploring a second language. The discovery of morphological productivity. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. García Mayo, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Eurosla yearbook 5 (pp. 251–268). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, M., & Aizawa, K.
(2000) An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: An exploratory study. System, 28, 291–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P.
(2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M.
(2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B.
(2002) Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 244–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A.
(Ed.) (2009) The bilingual mental lexicon. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Petrush, R. A.
(2008) Derivational morphology in English-French acquisition. In Roumyana Slabakova et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007) (pp. 181–187). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Rainer, F.
(2004) Nomi di qualità. In M. Grossmann, & F. Rainer (Eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano (pp. 293–314). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, J. W., Schrijnemakers, J/M.C., & Gremmen, F.
(1999) How to deal with ‘the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy’: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11(6), 1090–1098. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K.
(2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes 15(4-5), 507–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rehak, K. M., & Juffs, A.
(2011) Native and non-native processing of morphologically complex English words: Testing the influence of derivational prefixes. In G. Granena et al. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2010 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 125–142). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H.
(2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D.
(1999) Exploring the second language mental lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R.
(1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voga, M., Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, A., & Giraudo, H.
(2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek Speakers of ESL. Linguisticae Investigationes, this volume. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Ciaccio, Laura Anna, Gunnar Jacob & Niels O. Schiller
2019. Native speakers like affixes, L2 speakers like letters? An overt visual priming study investigating the role of orthography in L2 morphological processing. PLOS ONE 14:12  pp. e0226482 ff. Crossref logo
Giraudo, Hélène & Serena Dal Maso
2018.  In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],  pp. 603 ff. Crossref logo
Jacob, Gunnar, Vera Heyer & João Veríssimo
2018. Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. International Journal of Bilingualism 22:6  pp. 619 ff. Crossref logo
Kimppa, Lilli, Yury Shtyrov, Suzanne C.A. Hut, Laura Hedlund, Miika Leminen & Alina Leminen
2019. Acquisition of L2 morphology by adult language learners. Cortex 116  pp. 74 ff. Crossref logo
Vaid, Jyotsna & Renata F. I. Meuter
2017.  In Bilingualism [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 6],  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Yu, Xiaomei
2021. Chinese EFL learners’ morphological generalization of en verb series: Based on Construction Morphology. Lingua 253  pp. 103031 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.