Introduction
New perspectives on lexical plurals
Article outline
- Setting the scene: Definition and terminology
- Beyond lexical plurals
- 1.Beyond the ‘lexical(ist)’ statement: Towards an integrated formal approach of lexical plurality
- 2.Lexical change ‘before’ and ‘beyond’ lexical plurality
- 3.‘Besides’ lexical plurals
- 4.Lexical plurals in sign language
- Acknowledgements
- Note
- Scientific Committee
-
References
This article is available free of charge.
References (34)
References
Acquaviva, P. (2008). Lexical Plurals. A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A. (2011). Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of number. In M. Byram Wahsburn, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 281 (pp. 33–41). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (1994). Against split morphology. In G. Booij, & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1993 (pp, 27–50). Dordrecht: Kluwer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (1996). Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In G. Booij, & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995 (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, H. (2005). In Name Only. Structuring Sense, Volume I1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Colombat, B. (1993). Remarques sur le développement de la notion de personne dans l’histoire de la linguistique. Faits de langues, 31, 15–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, M. (1950). Regards sur la langue française. Paris: Sedes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curat, H. (1988). Pluriel interne et système morphologique du nombre en français. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 171, 29–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Damourette, J., & Pichon, E. (1927-1940). Des mots à la pensée. Paris: d’Artrey.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Carvalho, P. (1970). Recherches sur la catégorie du nombre en latin. Le pluriel poétique. Thèse de 3e cycle, inédite (disponible en photocopie).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Carvalho, P. (1974). Remarques sur certains signes de pluriel dans la déclinaison latine. Revue des études anciennes, 76, 3/4, 245–265. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Carvalho, P. (1993). Sur la grammaire du genre en latin. Evphrosyne, Revista de Filologia Clâssica, 211, 69–104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Carvalho, P. (2015). “Pluriels lexicaux” … ou “contre pluriel” ? “Nombre” … ou “quantitude”? Paper presented at the
workshop on Lexical Plurals
, 9-10 September 2015, Ghent (ms).
Flaux, N. (2000). Nouvelles remarques sur l’antonomase. Lexique, 151, 117–144.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Furukawa, N. (1977). Le nombre grammatical en français contemporain. Tokyo: France Tosho.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gréa, Ph. (2013). “Deux-trois mots” sur les déterminants de petite quantité: pluriel continu et perception sémantique. Journal of French Language Studies, 231, 193–219. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gréa, Ph. (2014). La question du collectif dans la grammaire de Damourette & Pichon. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 109 (1), 201–235.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guillaume, G. (1944–1945 [1991]). Leçon du 7 juin 1945. série B. Leçons de linguistique de Gustave Guillaume, 1944–1945, série A et B, publiées sous la direction de R. Valin, W. Hirtle et A. Joly, Québec/Lille: Presses de l'Université Laval et Presses universitaires de Lille (pp. 201–210) ([URL].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, M., & Maranz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale, & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 201 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O. (1913). A Modern English Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lammert, M. (2015). Les pluralia tantum sous l’angle du collectif. Langue Française, 1851, 73–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasersohn, P. (2011). Mass nouns and plurals. In K. von Heusinger, et al., Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 21 (pp. 1131–1153). Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lauwers, P. (2014). Les pluriels “lexicaux”. Typologie quantifiée des déficits de dénombrabilité. Langue française, 1831, 117–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lowe, J. (2007). Sortals and the Individuation of Objects. Mind and Language, 221, 514–533. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCawley, J. D. (1975). Lexicography and the Count-Mass Distinction. In C. Cogen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Berkeley Linguistic Society Conference (pp. 314–321). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molho, M. (1970). Duel et possessifs en florentin du 500. In Mélanges P. Fouché (pp. 59–79). Paris: Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ojeda, A. (2005). The Paradox of Mass Plurals. In S. Mufwene et al. (Eds.), Polymorphous Linguistics (pp. 389–410). Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Togeby, K. (1968). Structure immanente de la langue française. Paris: Larousse.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilmet, M. (19982). Grammaire critique du français. Bruxelles / Paris: Duculot.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zindel, R. (1958). Des abstraits en français et de leur pluralisation. Une contribution à l’étude des mécanismes de pensée. Berne: Francke.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Nagano, Akiko & Masaharu Shimada
2024.
NN and VV Coordinate Compounds.
Languages 9:4
► pp. 143 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Corbett, Greville G.
2019.
Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties.
Morphology 29:1
► pp. 51 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux
2018.
Visual Iconicity Across Sign Languages: Large-Scale Automated Video Analysis of Iconic Articulators and Locations.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.