Cover not available
Article published In:
Interactions and Language Acquisition in Non-Family Settings
Edited by Caroline Masson
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 15:1] 2024
► pp. 158–188

Conversations in early childhood education and care centres

The role of recasts in the co-construction of meaning and the acquisition of language features

| CNRS & Sorbonne Nouvelle
| Université Sorbonne Nouvelle
| Sorbonne Université
The present study describes the use of recasts by early childhood education and care (ECEC) professionals in five ECEC centres in France, and their effects on children’s language production – particularly on the phonological and morphosyntactic levels. We adopt a multimodal approach, taking into account recasts conveyed by vocal and visual modalities. The ECEC setting offers a complex interaction framework with more multiple and intertwined conversations than dyadic interactions. We aim to answer two questions: to what extent do the recasts of ECEC professionals contribute to the co-construction of meaning and discourse, and how do they constitute favourable contexts for children to experience the situated use of formal and functional linguistic features? Our results, based on 135 interactional sequences and qualitative analysis, show that under certain conditions, recasts are an efficient professional practice for scaffolding language acquisition and for involving children as active participants in dyadic interaction.
Keywords: ECEC, recasts, phonology, morphology, gazes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1The RaProChe project
    • 2.2Data selection
    • 2.3Data coding
  • 3.Analysis and results
    • 3.1General description of the recasts
    • 3.2Effects of recasts on dialogue and child language
      • 3.2.1Incorporated in dialogue: Effects on the course of interaction
      • 3.2.2Influence of the gaze on interactional sequences containing recasts
      • 3.2.3Effects on formal features of the child’s language
    • 3.3Qualitative analysis
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
    • 4.1Characteristics of adult recasts
    • 4.2Recasts as dialogue co-construction and linguistic scaffolding
    • 4.3Implications
    • 4.4Limitations and perspectives of the study
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 November 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.00025.yam
References (70)
References
Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. (2015). Multimodal acquisition and expression of negation. Analysis of a videotaped and longitudinal corpus of a French and an English mother-child dyad. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Sorbonne Nouvelle University.
Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., & Debras, C. (2017). Developing communicative postures: The emergence of shrugging in child communication. LIA 8 (1), 91–118.Google Scholar
Bernicot, J., Guidetti, M., & Marcos, H. (2004). Aspects structurels et fonctionnels du fonctionnement du langage. In H. Marcos, A. Salazar Orvig, J. Bernicot, M. Guidetti, C. Hudelot & C. Préneron (Eds.), Apprendre à parler : influence du mode de garde (pp. 127–150). L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Bernicot, J., Salazar-Orvig, A., & Veneziano, E. (2006). Les reprises : dialogue, formes, fonctions et ontogenèse. La Linguistique 42 1, 29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertin, T. (2011). Grammaticalisation du langage de l’enfant : processus interactionnel d’appropriation des articles et des clitiques sujets chez des enfants francophones entre 1 et 3 ans. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Université Nancy 2.
(2014). Rôle des reprises dans l’acquisition des articles et des clitiques sujets chez des enfants francophones âgés de 2 à 3 ans. TRANEL, 60 1, 21–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertin, T., & Masson, C. (2021). The role of dialogue and discourse co-construction in the acquisition of morpho-syntax: an interactional and dialogical process. Bakhtiniana – Revista de Estudos do Discurso, 16 (1), 88–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boutet, D. (2008). Une morphologie de la gestualité : Structuration articulaire. Cahiers de Linguistique Analogique, 5 1, 81–115.Google Scholar
Bres, J. (2017). Dialogisme : éléments pour l’analyse. Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures. Les Cahiers de l’Acedle, 14 1. [URL]
Bruner, J. S. (1983). Children’s talk: Learning how to use language. Norton.Google Scholar
Canut, E., & Espinosa, N. (2016). Jouer pour apprendre à parler à l’école maternelle : Regard sur la posture langagière de l’enseignant. Le Français Aujourd’hui, 195 1, 93–106.Google Scholar
Canut, E., Bocerean, C., & Musiol, M. (2012). How do adults use repetition? A comparison of conversations with young children and with multiply-handicapped adolescents. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41 1, 83–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canut, E., & Vertalier, M. (2014). Les schèmes sémantico-syntaxiques dans le processus interactionnel d’acquisition. In N. Espinosa, M. Vertalier & E. Canut (Eds.), Linguistique de l’acquisition du langage oral et écrit. Convergences entre les travaux fondateurs de Laurence Lentin et les problématiques actuelles (pp. 85–116). L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Casla, M., Méndez-Cabezas, C., Montero, I., Murillo, E., Nieva, S., & Rodríguez, J. (2022). Spontaneous verbal repetition in toddler-adult conversations: a longitudinal study with Spanish-speaking two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 49 1, 266–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouinard, M. M., & Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30 1, 637–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2006). La répétition et l’acquisition du langage, La Linguistique, 42 1, 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Conversation et reformulation dans l’acquisition du langage. TRANEL, 60 1, 7–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V., & Bernicot, J. (2008). Repetition as ratification: how parents and children place information in common ground. Journal of Child Language, 35 1, 349–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
da Silva-Genest, C. (2014). Reformulations en situation de rééducation orthophonique. TRANEL, 60 1, 137–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Pontonx, S., Leroy-Collombel, M., Masson, C., & Morgenstern, A. (2017). Transmission et élaboration du langage dans le dialogue. In A. Morgenstern & C. Parisse (Eds.), Le langage de l’enfant : de l’éclosion à l’explosion (pp. 27–40). Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Weck, G. & Salazar Orvig, A. (2019). L’apport des études de corpus à l’analyse de l’étayage, Corpus 19 1. URL: [URL]
Debras, C. (2017). The shrug. Gesture, 16 (1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degotardi, S. (2010). High-quality interactions with infants: relationship with early childhood practitioners’ interpretations and qualification levels in play and routine contexts. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18 (1), 27–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). The language environment of infant child care: Issues of quantity, quality, participation and context. In O. N. Saracho (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research on child care in early childhood education (pp. 85–107). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Degotardi, S., Torr, J., & Nguyen, N. T. (2016). Infant-toddler educators’ language support practices during snack-time. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41 1, 52–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degotardi, S., Han, F., & Torr, J. (2018). Infants’ experience with ‘near and clear’ educator talk: individual variation and its relationship to indicators of quality. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26 (3), 278–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, F. (2005). Interprétation et dialogue chez des enfants et quelques autres : recueil d’articles 1988–1995. Éditions de l’ENS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garnier, P., Brougère, G., Rayna, S., & Rupin, P. (2016). À 2 ans, vivre dans un collectif d’enfants. Crèche, école maternelle, classe passerelle, jardin maternel. Erès.Google Scholar
Girolametto, L., & Weitzman, E. (2002). Responsiveness of child care providers in interactions with toddlers and preschoolers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33 1, 268–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E., Lieshout, R. V., & Duff, D. (2000). Directiveness in teachers’ language input to toddlers and preschoolers in daycare. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43 1, 1101–1114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In K. Sotaro (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 1, 8–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M., Balciuniene, I., Korecky-Kröll, K., Laaha, S., & Dressler, W. U. (2009). On the role of pragmatics in child directed speech for the acquisition of verb morphology. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 1, 219–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M., Dressler, W., Laaha, S., & Korecky-Kröll, K. (2006). Réactions adultes aux productions morphologiques des enfants. La Linguistique, 42 1, 51–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd edition). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marcos, H., Salazar Orvig, A., Bernicot, J., Guidetti, M., Hudelot, C., & Préneron, C. (2004). Apprendre à parler : influence du mode de garde. L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Masson, C. (2022). Parler à et avec les enfants en crèche : conduites langagières et dialogiques des adultes et des enfants en situation de lecture partagée et de jeu libre. Actes du 8ème Congrès de Linguistique Française, SHS Web of Conferences, 138 1, 09008. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masson, C., & Bertin, T. (2021). Accompagner le développement langagier du très jeune enfant : Une recherche-action-formation dans les structures de petite enfance. TRANEL, 74 1, 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). De la recherche à la pratique et vice-versa : pour une linguistique impliquée avec des professionnel·les de la petite enfance. In V. Miguel Addisu & I. Maillochon (Eds.), Vivre et parler avec de jeunes enfants en crèche. Situations langagières, postures professionnelles, formation (pp. 211–232). L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Montagner, H. (2012). L’enfant et la communication. Comment gestes, attitudes et vocalisations deviennent des messages. Dunod. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, A., & Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. (2021, nov). Adult’s spoken reformulations of children’s plurisemiotic productions: Highlighting the primacy of spoken language [Conference presentation]. AAA conference, Baltimore, MD, US.
Morgenstern, A., Leroy-Collombel, M., & Caët, S. (2013). Self-and other-repairs in child–adult interaction at the intersection of pragmatic abilities and language acquisition. Journal of Pragmatics, 56 1, 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munson, B., Johnson, J. M., & Edwards, J. (2012). The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison between speech-language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21 (2), 124–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakatsukasa, K. (2021). Gesture-enhanced recasts have limited effects: A case of the regular past tense. Language Teaching Research, 25 1, 587–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Kaplan, B. J., Denninger, S., Bonvillian, J. D., & Baker, N. D. (1984). Maternal input adjustments as related to children’s linguistic advances and to language acquisition theories. In A. Pelligrini & T. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts, advances in discourse processes, Vol XIII (pp. 31–56). Ablex.Google Scholar
Olsher, D. (2008). Gesturally-enhanced repeats in the repair turn: Communication strategy or cognitive language-learning tool? In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 109–130). Routledge.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 〈[URL]〉.
Rayna, S. (2016). L’accueil des jeunes enfants : nouvelles approches. Spirale, 80 (4), 100–110.Google Scholar
Rezzonico, S., de Weck, G., Salazar Orvig, A., da Silva-Genest, C., & Rahmati, S. (2014). Maternal recasts and activity variations: a comparison of mother–child dyads involving children with and without SLI. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28 1, 223–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhyner, P. M., Guenther, K. L., Pizur-Barnekow, K., Cashin, S. E., & Chavie, A. L. (2013). Child caregivers’ contingent responsiveness behaviors during interactions with toddlers within three daycare contexts. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34 (4), 232–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodi, M. (2011). Interactions logopédiste-enfant : Comment se construisent des échanges potentiellement acquisitionnels dans une situation de jeu symbolique ? Glossa, 1101, 49–68.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L., & Snow, C. E. (2020). Analyzing input quality along three dimensions: interactive, linguistic, and conceptual. Journal of Child Language, 47 1, 5–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., & Grossen, M. (2008). Le dialogisme dans l’entretien clinique. Langage et Société, 123 (1), 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., & Morgenstern, A. (2015). Acquisition and use of pronouns in a dialogic perspective. In S. Allen & L. Serratrice (Eds), The acquisition of reference (pp.155–180). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sales Cordeiro, G., Zogmal, M., Franck, J., Alaria, L., Fillietaz, L., Gentaz, E., & Garcia, S. (2020). Projet CapLang : soutenir les capacités langagières et littéraciques des enfants à travers le développement professionnel des éducatrices et éducateurs de l’enfance. Forum-lecture.ch Plate-forme en ligne pour la littératie, 1 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
Saxton, M., Backley, P., & Gallaway, C. (2005). Negative input for grammatical errors: effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language, 32 (3), 643–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soderstrom, M., Grauer, E., Dufault, B., & McDivitt, K. (2018). Influences of number of adults and adult: child ratios on the quantity of adult language input across childcare settings. First Language, 38 (6), 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soderstrom, M., & Wittebolle, K. (2013). When do caregivers talk? The influences of activity and time of day on caregiver speech and child vocalizations in two childcare environments. PLoS ONE, 8 (11). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strapp, C. M., & Federico, A. (2000). Imitations and repetitions: What do children say following recasts? First Language, 20 1, 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The Manu-facture of meaning. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torr, J. (2019). Infants’ experiences of shared reading with educators in early childhood education and care centres: An observational study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47 1, 519–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E. (2005). Effects of conversational functioning on early language acquisition: When both caregivers and children matter. In B. Bokus (Ed.), Studies in the psychology of child language (pp. 47–69). Matrix.Google Scholar
(2014). Interactions langagières, échanges conversationnels et acquisition du langage. Contraste, 39 1, 31–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Parisse, C. (2010). The acquisition of early verbs in French: Assessing the role of conversation and of child-directed speech. First Language, 30 (3/4), 287–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986 [1934]). Thought and language. (Newly revised, translated, and edited by Alex Kozulin). The M.l.T. Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976/1983). Le rôle de l’interaction de tutelle. In J. S. Bruner (Ed.), Le développement de l’enfant : savoir faire, savoir dire (pp.260–280). PUF.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, N., Morgenstern, A., Leroy-Collombel, M., & Caët, S. (2011, June 15–18). The accidental phonologist? How a mother adjusts her other-repairs to the child’s phonological development [Conference Presentation]. ICPC Conference, York, UK.
Zogmal, M. (2008). « T’es un enfant à caprices ». Les stratégies défensives du métier d’éducatrice du jeune enfant. Université de Genève.Google Scholar