Research has documented systematic articulation differences in young children’s first signs compared with the adult input. Explanations range from the implementation of phonological processes, cognitive limitations and motor immaturity. One way of disentangling these possible explanations is to investigate signing articulation in adults who do not know any sign language, but have mature cognitive and motor development. Some preliminary observations are provided on signing accuracy in a group of adults using a sign repetition methodology. Adults make the most errors with marked handshapes and produce movement and location errors akin to child signers. Secondly, there are both positive and negative influences of iconicity on sign repetition in adults. Possible reasons are discussed for these iconicity effects based on gesture.
2015. Input processing at first exposure to a sign language. Second Language Research 31:4 ► pp. 443 ff.
Ortega, Gerardo & Gary Morgan
2015. Phonological Development in Hearing Learners of a Sign Language: The Influence of Phonological Parameters, Sign Complexity, and Iconicity. Language Learning 65:3 ► pp. 660 ff.
Vinson, David, Robin L. Thompson, Robert Skinner & Gabriella Vigliocco
2015. A faster path between meaning and form? Iconicity facilitates sign recognition and production in British Sign Language. Journal of Memory and Language 82 ► pp. 56 ff.
Morgan, Gary
2014. On language acquisition in speech and sign: development of combinatorial structure in both modalities. Frontiers in Psychology 5
Woll, Bencie
2012. Second Language Acquisition of Sign Language. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.