Cover not available
Article published In:
French liaison in second language acquisition / La liaison en français langue étrangère: Issues, methods and perspectives / Thèmes, méthodes et perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Malin Ågren
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 10:1] 2019
► pp. 117–139

The production of preverbal liaison in Swedish learners of L2 French

| Lund University
| Lund University

The acquisition of preverbal liaison (e.g. ils arrivent /ilzaʀiv/) in second language (L2) French has rarely been explored in detail in previous studies on obligatory liaison. In this study, we conducted an elicited imitation test in order to study the influence of proficiency level, modality (spoken or written), and verb frequency on the use of preverbal liaison among 42 Swedish learners of L2 French and 21 native speakers of French. The results indicate that L2 beginners had considerable difficulty with the production of preverbal liaison, while the most proficient L2 learners performed nearly as well as the native speakers. In addition, we observed that beginner learners, in contrast to the more proficient ones, performed better with written than spoken stimuli. Finally, we observed no impact of verb frequency on participant performance. Based on these results, we discuss the possible influence of input frequency (both type and token) on the production of preverbal liaison, and conclude that future studies need to address the input characteristics of the L2 classroom in more detail.

Keywords: liaison, French, second language acquisition, phonology, subject-verb agreement, Swedish learners
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research on French liaison
    • 2.1Preverbal liaison in spoken French
    • 2.2L2 acquisition of liaison
    • 2.3The linguistic representation of liaison in L2 learners
  • 3.Research questions and hypotheses
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2The task
    • 4.3Tested verbs
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.17023.agr
References
Andreassen, H., & Lyche, C.
(2015) Enchaînement, liaison, accentuation chez les apprenants norvégophones. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée 1021, 105–121.Google Scholar
Ågren, M.
(2014) Production et compréhension de la morphologie verbale en FLE: les difficultés de l’accord sujet-verbe en nombre. Les Cahiers de l’AFLS 19(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
(2015) La liaison préverbale comme accord sujet-verbe en FLE. In E. Havu & M. Paloheimo (Eds.), L’acquisition de constructions verbales en langue étrangère. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki (pp. 159–174). Vanta: Hansaprint.Google Scholar
Ågren, M. & van de Weijer, J.
(2013) Input frequency and the acquisition of number agreement in L1 and L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies 231, 311–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2001) Frequency effects in French liaison. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 337–359). Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chabanal, D. & Liégeois, L.
(2014) Production de liaisons dans l’input parental. In C. Soum-Favaro, A. Coquillon & J. P. Chevrot (Eds.), La liaison: approches contemporaines (pp. 263–282). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chevrot, J. P., Dugua, C., & Fayol, M.
(2009) Liaison acquisition, word segmentation and construction in French: a usage-based account. Journal of Child Language 361, 557–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, J. P., Fayol, M. & Laks, B.
(2005) La liaison: De la phonologie à la cognition. Langages 1581, 3–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Côté, M. H.
(2017) La liaison en diatopie: Esquisse d’une typologie. Journal of French Language Studies 271, 13–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Language Policy Unit. [URL]
Delattre, P.
(1947) La liaison en français : Tendances et classifications. French Review 22(2), 148–157.Google Scholar
de Moras, N.
(2011) Acquisition de la liaison et de l’enchaînement en français L2. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Western Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Detey, S., & Racine, I.
(2019) Learning to read liaisons in French as a Foreign Language: A longitudinal study of beginner Japanese learners in Japan. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 10(1), 97–117. [This volume] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DIALANG: Self-assessment tool for second language proficiency according to the six levels of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages
[URL]
Dubois, J.
(1967) Grammaire structurale du français : Le verbe. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Durand, J., & Lyche, C.
(2008) French liaison in the light of corpus data. Journal of French Language Studies 18(1), 33–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durand, J., Laks, B., & Lyche, C.
(2009) Le projet PFC: une source de données primaires structurées. In J. Durand, B. Laks & C. Lyche (Eds.), Phonologie, variation et accents du français (19–61). Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar
Erlam, R.
(2006) Elicited imitation as a measure of implicit L2 knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics 27(3), 464–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eychenne, J., & Laks, B.
(2017) La liaison en français contemporain: normes, usages, acquisitions. Journal of French Language Studies 27(1), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eychenne, J., Lyche, C., Durand, J., & Coquillon, A.
(2014) Quelles données pour la liaison en français: La question des corpus. In C. Soum-Favaro, A. Coquillon & J.-P. Chevrot (Eds.), La liaison: approches contemporaines (33–60). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ferrand, L., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., New, B., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M.
(2008) Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables. Behaviour Research Methods 40(4), 1049–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnois-Delpiano, M., Cavalla, C., & Chevrot, J.-P.
(2012) L’acquisition de la liaison en L2 : étude longitudinale des apprenants coréens de FLE et comparaison avec enfants francophones natifs. In F. Neveu (Eds.), SHS Web of Conferences Actes du 3e Congrès Mondiale de linguistique française (pp. 1575–1589).Google Scholar
(2019) French liaison acquisition in L1 children and L2 adults: Methodological issues in exploring differences and similarities. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 10(1), 45–70. [This volume] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, M.
(2013) La liaison en français langue étrangère. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 4(2), 190–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legendre, G., Barrière, I., Goyet, L., & Nazzi, T.
(2010) Comprehension of Infrequent Subject-Verb Agreement Forms: Evidence from French-learning Children. Child Development 811, 1859–1875. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marty, F.
(2001) Les signaux morphologiques du français parlé. Le français moderne 69(2), 211–240.Google Scholar
Mastromonaco, S.
(1999) Liaison in French as a second language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C.
(2007) The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics 281, 661–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustka, E.
(2015) Die liaison im Fremdsprachenerwerb: eine Pilotstudie zu Münchner Lehramtsstudenten. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée 1021, 43–64.Google Scholar
Racine, I.
(2015) La liaison chez les apprenants hispanophones avancés de FLE. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée 1021, 147–167.Google Scholar
Racine, I., & Detey, S.
(2015) Corpus oraux, liaison et locuteurs non natifs: de la recherche en phonologie à l’enseignement du français langue étrangère. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée 1021, 1–25.Google Scholar
Racine, I., Detey, S., Zay, F., & Kawaguchi, Y.
(2012) Des atouts d’un corpus multitâches pour l’étude de la phonologie en L2: L’exemple du projet « Interphonologie du français contemporain » (IPFC). In A. Kamber & C. Skupiens (Eds.), Recherches récentes en FLE (1–19). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E.
(2010) The exploitation of fine phonetic detail in the processing of L2 French. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (259–279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, E., & Wauquier, S.
(2013) Developmental strategies in the acquisition of French liaison. Paper presented at the conference of the European Second Language Association (EuroSLA), Amsterdam, August 2013.
(2019) The emergence of speech segmentation in adult L2 learners of French. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 10(1), 22–44. [This volume] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soum-Favaro, C., Coquillon, A., & Chevrot, J. P.
(Eds.) (2014) La liaison: Approches contemporaines. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stridfelt, M.
(2005) La perception du français oral par des apprenants suédois. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Institute for modern languages, Umeå University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.
(2004) Phonetic norm versus usage in advanced French as a second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics 421, 365–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tillman, B., Martin, S., & Pettersson, M.
(2012) Escalade 1. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Wauquier, S.
(2009) Acquisition de la liaison en L1 et L2 : Stratégies phonologiques ou lexicales ? AILE…LIA 21, 93–130.Google Scholar
Wauquier, S., & Shoemaker, E.
(2013) Convergence and divergence in the acquisition of French liaison by native and non-native speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 4(2), 161–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Véronique, D.
(Ed.) (2009) L’acquisition de la grammaire du français langue étrangère. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Bardel, Camilla, Henrik Gyllstad & Jörgen Tholin
2023. Research on foreign language learning, teaching, and assessment in Sweden 2012–2021. Language Teaching 56:2 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Detey, Sylvain & Isabelle Racine
2019. Learning to read liaison in French as a Foreign Language. Language, Interaction and Acquisition. Langage, Interaction et Acquisition 10:1 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Vanhove, Jan
2021. Towards simpler and more transparent quantitative research reports. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 172:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.