Cover not available
Article published In:
French liaison in second language acquisition / La liaison en français langue étrangère: Issues, methods and perspectives / Thèmes, méthodes et perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Malin Ågren
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 10:1] 2019
► pp. 71–95

The development of obligatory liaison in early L2 learners of French

| Lund University, Sweden
Studies on the acquisition of French liaison have primarily focused on monolingual children or adult second language (L2) learners in a university context. To bridge the gap between these two populations, the present article focuses on child L2 (cL2) learners – a particularly interesting group, since they are L2 learners who, unlike adults, do not have access to writing. How does liaison develop in cL2 French? Is the development more similar to L1 or L2 acquisition? These questions are explored through longitudinal data from cL2 learners (age of onset: 3;0–3;5, n = 3), with monolingual (n = 2) and bilingual (n = 3) L1 controls. The cL2 data present certain similarities with adult L2 learners, but also with L1 controls. However, productions vary greatly within the L2 group: whereas one of the three learners shows clear development over time, behaving similarly to the L1 children at the end of the observation period, another learner hardly produces any liaisons at all.
Keywords: child second language acquisition, phonology, liaison, French
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies on the acquisition of liaison
    • 2.1L1 acquisition of liaison
    • 2.2Second language acquisition of liaison
    • 2.3Comparing L1 and L2 acquisition
    • 2.4Aim and research questions
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Material
    • 3.3Analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Results for monolingual and bilingual controls
    • 4.2Results for the cL2 learners
      • 4.2.1Naomi (AoA: 3;4)
      • 4.2.2Isa (AoA: 3;5)
      • 4.2.3Fia (AoA: 3;0)
      • 4.2.4A possible developmental path
    • 4.3Comparing the cL2 learners and the controls
    • 4.4Comparison with previous studies
  • 5.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.17024.spl
References (29)
References
Anderson, R. (2004). Phonological acquisition in preschoolers learning a second language via immersion: A longitudinal study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18(3), 183–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Available at: [URL]
Chevrot, J.-P., Chabanal, D., & Dugua, C. (2007). Pour un modèle de l’acquisition des liaisons basé sur l’usage: trois études de cas. Journal of French Language Studies, 17(1), 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, J.-P., Dugua, C., & Fayol, M. (2009). Liaison acquisition, word segmentation and construction in French: A usage-based account. Journal of Child Language, 36(3), 557–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, J.-P., Dugua, C., Harnois-Delpiano, M., Siccardi, A., & Spinelli, E. (2013). Liaison acquisition: Debates, critical issues, future research. Language Sciences, 391, 83–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dugua, C. (2006). Liaison, segmentation lexicale et schémas syntaxiques entre 2 et 6 ans : Un modèle développemental basé sur l’usage. PhD dissertation. Université Grenoble-III.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–132). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hambly, H., Wren, Y., McLeod, S., & Roulstone, S. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on speech production: A systematic review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnois-Delpiano, M. (2016). Le kaléidoscope de la liaison en français : Etude comparée de son appropriation par des apprenants adultes de FLE et des enfants natifs. PhD dissertation. Université Grenoble Alpes.Google Scholar
Harnois-Delpiano, M., Cavalla, C., & Chevrot, J.-P. (2019). French liaison acquisition in L1 children and L2 adults: Methodological issues in exploring differences and similarities. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 10(1), 45–70. [This volume] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. (2005). L’acquisition de la liaison en français langue seconde. Une analyse quantitative d’apprenants avancés en milieu guidé et en milieu naturel. CORELA (Numéros thématiques, Colloque AFLS). Available at: [URL] (Accessed: 15 September 2018).
(2013). La liaison en français langue seconde: Une étude longitudinale préliminaire. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4(2), 190–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansma, J. (2012). L’acquisition de la liaison par les apprenants néerlandophones. Une étude de cas. Unpublished Masters dissertation. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(03), 251–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mårtensson, J. (2012). La réalisation de la liaison en français langue seconde à un niveau débutant: Une analyse quantitative de la production de cinq apprenantes suédophones. Unpublished Bachelor’s dissertation. Lund University.Google Scholar
Mastromonaco, S. M. (1999). Liaison in French as a second language. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2008). Child second language acquisition or successive first language acquisition. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 55–80). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Moras, N. (2011). Acquisition de la liaison et de l’enchaînement en français L2 : Le rôle de la fréquence. Unpublished PhD dissertation. The University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Nardy, A. (2008). Acquisition des variables sociolinguistiques entre 2 et 6 ans : facteurs sociologiques et influences des interactions au sein du réseau social. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Grenoble-III.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E., & Paradis, J. (2011). Learning to liaise and elide comme il faut: Evidence from bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 38(4), 701–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruvoletto, S. (2016). Étude longitudinale des phénomènes de resyllabation chez les enfants français entre compétence phonologique, lecture et orthographe. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Paris 8.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. (2004). Why child L2 acquisition? In J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (Eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003 (pp. 47–66). Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, E., & Wauquier, S. (2019). The emergence of speech segmentation in adult L2 learners of French. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 10(1), 22–44. [This volume] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Splendido, F. (2014). Le développement d’aspects phonético-phonologiques du français chez des enfants bilingues simultanés et successifs. Le VOT et la liaison dans une étude de cas multiples. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Lund University.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. (2004). Phonetic norm versus usage in advanced French as a second language. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42(4), 365–382.Google Scholar
Wauquier-Gravelines, S. (2005). Statut des représentations phonologiques en acquisition, traitement de la parole continue et dysphasie développementale. Mémoire de synthèse pour le diplôme D’Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches. EHESS.Google Scholar
Wauquier, S. (2009). Acquisition de la liaison en L1 et L2 : stratégies phonologiques ou lexicales ? Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère (Aile… Lia 2), 93–130.Google Scholar