Article published In:
Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 6:2 (2015) ► pp.181201
References
Ågren, M., Granfeldt, J. & Schlyter, S
(2012) The growth of complexity and accuracy in L2 French. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency (95–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I
(1996) Éléments pour une typologie des SN complexes en de en français. In L. Kupferman (ed.), La préposition de . Langue française 1091, 29–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Towards a typology of French NP de NP structures or how much possession is there in complex noun phrases with de in French? In I. Baron, M. Herslund & F. Sorensen (eds.), Dimensions of possession (147–167). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I. & Forsgren, M
(2010) Les adjectifs relationnels revisités. In J. Goes & E. Moline (eds.), L’adjectif hors de sa catégorie (57–77). Artois: Artois Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
Bartning, I. & Hammarberg, B
(2007) The functions of a high-frequency collocation in native and learner discourse: The case of French c’est and Swedish det är . IRAL 451, 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I. & Kirchmeyer, N
(2003) Le développement de la compétence textuelle à travers les stades acquisitionnels en français L2. AILE 191, 9–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I. & Schlyter, S
(2004) Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies 141, 301–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulté, B. & Housen, A
(2012) Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (21–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 261, 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö
(2004) The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, B. & Lewis, M
subm.). Complexity in the noun phrase in native and very advanced non-native speech. Stockholm University.
Forsberg Lundell, F. & Bartning, I
(2015) Successful profiles in high-level L2 French – ‘c’est un choix de vie’. In F. Forsberg Lundell & I. Bartning (eds.), Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engel, H., Gudmundson, A., Hancock, V. & Lindqvist, C
(2014) Beyond advanced stages in high-level L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies 241, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flaux, N. & van de Velde, D
(2000) Les noms en français: Esquisse de classement. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Granfeldt, J
(2003) L’acquisition des catégories fonctionnelles. Étude comparative du développement du DP français chez des enfants et des apprenants adultes. Lund: Lunds universitet.Google Scholar
Hancock, V. & Kirchmeyer, N
(2005) Discourse structuring in advanced L2 French: The relative clause. In J.M. Dewaele (ed.), Focus on French (17–35). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A. & Kuiken, F
(2009) Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition, Applied Linguistics 301, 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I
Hyltenstam, K, Bartning, I. & Fant, L
(eds.) (2014) Avancerad Andraspråksanvändning. Slutrapport från ett forskningsprogram. RJ:s skriftserie 2. Göteborg/Stockholm: Makadam Förlag.Google Scholar
Kleiber, G., Laca, B. & Tasmowski, L
(eds.) (2001) Typologie des groupes nominaux. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar
Kufpermann, L
(ed) (1996) La préposition de . Langue française 1091.Google Scholar
Lahmann, C
2015Beyond barriers: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in long-term L2 speakers’ speech. PhD thesis. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Marcusson, M
(2013) La construction Nom+de+Nom en français contemporain: Essai d’une approche cognitive. PhD thesis. Tromsö University.Google Scholar
Miestamo, M
(2008) Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (23–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noailly, M
(1990) Le substantif épithète. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
(1999) L’adjectif en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Norris, J. & Ortega, L
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA. The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4), 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, G
(2009) CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics 30(4), 590–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research 31(1): 117–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J., Spang-Hanssen, E. & Vikner, C
(1982) Fransk universitetsgrammatik. Stockholm: Esselte studium.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. & Berman, R
(2010) Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language 301, 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riegel, M., Pellat, J-Chr. & Rioul, R
(1994/2011) Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Rouget, C
(2000) Distribution et sémantique des constructions Nom de Nom. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Tonkyn, A
(2012) Measuring and perceiving changes in oral complexity, accuracy and fluency. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (221–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Daele, S., Housen A. & Pierrard, M
(2007) Fluency, accuracy and complexity in the manifestation and the development of two second languages. In S. van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard & I. Vedder (eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language learning and teaching (301–316). Wetteren: Universa Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H.-Y
(1998) Second language development in writing. Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar