References

References

Aijmer, K. & Simon-Vandenbergen, A-M.
(2003) The discourse particle well and its equivalents in Swedish and Dutch. Linguistics 41, 1123–1161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andorno C.
(2007) Apprendere il lessico: elaborazione di segnali discorsivi (sì, no, così). In M. Chini, P. Desideri, M.E. Favilla & G. Pallotti (eds.), Imparare una lingua: recenti sviluppi teorici e proposte applicative. Atti del VI Congresso di Studi AitLA (95–122). Perugia: Guerra.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J.M. & Heritage, J.
(eds.) (1984) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bardel, C.
(2004) La pragmatica in italiano L2: l’uso dei segnali discorsivi. In F. Albano Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino & R. Savy (eds.), Atti del convegno nazionale Il parlato italiano. Napoli, 13–15 febbraio, 2003. Napoli: M. D’Auria Aditore. CD–ROM.Google Scholar
Bardel, C., Gudmundson, A. & Lindqvist, C.
(2012) Aspects of lexical sophistication in advanced learner’s oral production: vocabulary acquisition and use in L2 French and Italian. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, 269–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, C.
(1994) Le facce del parlare. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
(2005) Linguistica e pragmatica del linguaggio. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
(2006) Discourse Markers in Italian: Towards a “Compositional Meaning”. In K. Fisher (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (449–464). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Deppermann, A.
(2013) Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics 46, 91–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferraris, S.
(2004) Come usano “ma” gli apprendenti di italiano L1 e L2? In G. Bernini, G. Ferrari & M. Pavesi (eds.), Atti del 3° congresso di studi dell’Associazione Italiana di Linguistica Applicata. Perugia, 21–22 febbraio 2002 (73–91). Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engel, H., Gudmundson, A., Hancock, V. & Lindqvist, C.
(2014) Beyond advanced stages in high-level spoken L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies 24, 255–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R.
(2001) When listener talk. Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ten Have, P.
(2007) Doing conversation analysis. A practical guide. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, M.
(2009) Marking a ‘noticing of departure’ in talk: Eh-prefaced turns in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 41, 2100–2129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, J. & Pekarek-Doehler, S.
(2010) On the contingent nature of language-learning tasks. Classroom Discourse 1, 25–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action (299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27, 291–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying and agreement/disagreement. In C. Ford, B. Fox & S. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence (196–224). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics 57, 331–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. & Clayman, S.
(2010) Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. & Raymond, G.
(2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68, 15–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J.-P. De Ruiter (ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (179–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jafrancesco, E.
(2015) L’acquisizione dei segnali discorsivi in italiano L2. Italiano LinguaDue 1, 1–39.Google Scholar
(2010) I segnali discorsivi in italiano L2. Dati dell’acquisizione e implicazioni glottodidattiche. In I. Di Passio & D. Paolini (eds.), Processi di apprendimento in un mondo che cambia (79–120). Milano-Firenze: Mondadori Education-Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & Prior, M.T.
(2015) Analyzing storytelling in TESOL interview research. TESOL Quarterly 49, 226–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & Wagner, J.
(2011) A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (117–142). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kim, H.R.S. & Kuroshima, S.
(2013) Turn beginnings in interaction: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 57, 267–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, J.
(2006) Grammar in the service of interaction: Exploring turn organization in Swedish. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39, 81–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manili, P.
(2001) Funzioni e uso dei segnali discorsivi nell’italiano L2. L’Italia dialettale 62, 137–205.Google Scholar
Markee, N. & Kunitz, S.
(2015) CA-for-SLA studies of classroom interaction: Quo vadis? In N. Markee (ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (425–439). Boston, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Markee, N. & Kasper, G.
(2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal 88, 491–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 88, 501–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pauletto, F., Greco, A. & Bardel, C.
. (in progress). Oh! You really sound Italian to me. Native speakers’ judgments of advanced L2 learners oral production.
Poggi, I.
(1981) Le interiezioni. Studio del linguaggio e analisi della mente. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
(2009) The language of interjections. In A. Esposito, A. Hussain, M. Marinaro & M. Martone (eds.), Multimodal signals: Cognitive and algorithmic issues (170–186). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984a) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1984b) Pursuing a response. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (152–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, G.
(2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68, 939–967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Grammar and social relations: Alternative forms of Yes/No type initiating actions in health visitor interaction. In A.F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (eds.), “Why Do You Ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse (87–107). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1984) Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation (54–69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sacks, A.
(1992) Lectures on conversation. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
(1987) Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn taking organization. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization (70–85). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1997) Third turn repair. In G.R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin & J. Baugh (eds.), Towards a social science of language: papers in honor of William Labov. Volume 2: Social interaction and discourse structures (31–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. & Lerner, G.H.
(2009) Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42, 91–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. & Sacks, H.
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 4, 289–327.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53, 361– 382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P.
(2005) “Task” as research construct. Language Learning 55(3), 533–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J.
(2010) Conversation analysis. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M.
(1975) Toward an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, T.
(2010) An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 2772–2781. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, E.
(2011) Simulated interaction and communication skills training: The ‘Conversation analytic role-play method’. In C. Antaki (ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Changing institutional practices (119–139). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Andorno, Cecilia & Fabiana Rosi
2016. Confirming or asserting?. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 7:1  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
De Cristofaro, Elisa & Linda Badan
2019. The Acquisition of Italian Discourse Markers as a Function of Studying Abroad. Corpus Pragmatics Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.