Article published In:
Language, Interaction and AcquisitionVol. 7:2 (2016) ► pp.180–211
Explanatory content and visibility effects on the young child’s verbal and gestural behavior in free dialogues
In this study we analyzed the verbal and gestural behavior of 6-year-old French children during free dialogue explanation. We expected that children would alter their gestures according to content explained and interlocutor visibility. Thirty children explained two games to a peer: fifteen could not see their interlocutor whereas fifteen could. Results showed that the mean number of clauses per explanation of a child speaker interacting with a child addressee did not significantly change according to content explained or the visibility of the addressee. However, the mean number of gestures per clause is higher for a child speaker interacting with a child addressee both when explaining the spatial game and when face-to-face. Finally, children explaining how to play a spatial game produced more representational gestures and made more interactive gestures when the addressee was visible. These results are discussed in relation to previous studies on children’s language production and acquisition.
References (72)
Aisenman, R., & Berman, R. (2000). Rethinking lexical analysis. Developing Literacy across Genres, Modalities, and Languages, 31, 187–196.
Alibali, M.W., & Don, L.S. (2001). Children’s gesture are meant to be seen. Gesture, 1(2), 113–127. 
Alibali, M.W., Kita, S., & Young, A.J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613.
Alibali, M.W., Heath, D.C., & Myers, H.J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(6), 169–188.
Alamillo, R.A., Colletta, J.-M., & Guidetti, M. (2013). Gesture and language in narratives and explanations: The effects of age and communicative activity on late multimodal discourse development. Journal of Child Language, 40(3), 511–538.
Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing. The social organisation of accounts. London: Sage.
Argerich, N., & Tolchinsky, L. (2000). On a definition of lexical items in written and spoken texts. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages, 31, 197–204.
Bavelas, J.B., & Healing, S. (2013). Reconciling the effects of mutual visibility on gesturing. Gesture, 13(1), 63–92.
Bavelas, J.B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D.A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15(4), 469–489.
Bavelas, J.B., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C., & Prevost D. (2008). Gesturing on the telephone: independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language 581, 495–520.
Beattie, G. & Aboudan, R. (1994). Gestures, pauses and speech: An experimental Investigation of the effects of changing social context on their precise temporal relationships. Semiotica, 991, 239–272.
Berman, R.A. (2000). Thematic perspectives on how children talk about interpersonal conflict. Developing Literacy across Genres, Modalities, and Languages, 31, 65–76.
. (2008). The psycholinguistics of text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35(4), 1–37.
Berman, R.A., & Katzenberger, I. (2004). Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 57–94.
Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I. (1987). Five ways of learning to talk about events: A crosslinguistic study of children’s narratives (Berkeley Cognitive Science Report No. 46). Berkeley CA: Institute of Cognitive Studies, University of California.
Berman, R.A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities in speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5(1), 1–43.
Cohen, A.A. (1977). The communications functions of hand illustrators. Journal of Communication, 27(4), 54–63.
Cohen, A.A., & Harrison, R.P. (1973). Intentionality in the use of hand illustrators in face-to-face communication situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(2), 276–279.
Coirier, P., Gaonac’h, D., & Passerault, J.-M. (1996). Psycholinguistique textuelle. Paris: Armand Colin Édition.
Colletta, J.-M. (2004). Le développement de la parole chez l’enfant âgé de 6 et 11 ans. Corps, langage et cognition. Hayen, Belgique: Mardaga.
. (2009). Comparative analysis of children’s narratives at different ages: A multimodal approach. Gesture, 9(1), 61–97.
Colletta, J.-M., Lachnitt, C., & Simon, J.-P. (2005). Les conduites explicatives orales à l’école maternelle. In J.-F. Halté & M. Rispail (Eds.), L’oral dans la classe: Compétences, enseignement, activités (pp. 137–151). Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
Colletta, J.-M., & Pellenq, C. (2005). Les explications entre 3 et 11 ans: Fenêtre sur le développement discursif et multimodal de la parole. Fifth IAIMTE Conference, Albi, 11-13 mai.
Colletta, J.-M. & Pellenq, C. (2009). The development of multimodal explanations in French children. In M.A. Nippold & C.M. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults development and disorders (pp. 63–100). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Colletta, J.-M., Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., Guidetti, M., & Levine, S. (2011). Multimodal data transcription and annotation with ELAN (Coding manual). ANR Multimodality research. Retrived from [URL]
Cosnier, J. (1996). Les gestes du dialogue, la communication verbale. Psychologie de la Motivation, 211, 129–138.
. (2008). Les gestes du dialogue. In P. Cabin & J.-F. Dortier (Eds.), La communication, état des savoirs (pp. 119–128). Auxerre: Editions Sciences Humaines.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Kent, G. (1996). Visual signals and communication abilities of children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(3), 595–608.
Emmorey, K., & Casey, S. (2001). Gesture, thought and spatial language. Gesture, 1(1), 35–50.
Fantazi, D. (2010). La gestualité cohésive dans les récits d’enfants âgés de 9 à 11 ans. Lidil, 421, 97–112.
Favart, M., & Passerault, J.-M. (1996). Functionnality of cohesion devices in the management of local and global coherence: two studies in children’s written production of narratives. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Berg, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodologies in writing (pp. 349–365). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Gineste, M.-D., & Le Ny, J.-F. (2002). Psychologie cognitive du langage. Paris: Dunod.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Graziano, M. (2010). Le développement des gestes pragmatiques et leur relation avec le développement de la compétence textuelle chez l’enfant âgés de 4 à 10 ans. Lidil, 421, 113–138.
Grize, J.-B. (1990). Logique et langage. Paris: Ophrys.
Guidetti, M., Fibigerova, K., & Colletta, J.-M. (2014). Gestures and multimodal development. Some keys issues for language acquisition. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gulberg (Eds.), From Gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp. 351–370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hempel, C.G. & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 567–579.
Hickmann, M., Kail, M., & Roland, F. (1995). L’organisation référentielle dans les récits d’enfants en fonction des contraintes contextuelles. Enfance, 21, 215–226.
Jisa, H. (2004). Growing into academic French. In R.A. Berman (Ed.), Later language development: Typological and psycholinguistic perspectives (Trends in Language Acquisition Research 3), (pp. 135–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johansson, V. (1999). Word frequencies in speech and Writing: A study of expository discourse. Genre and Modality in Developing Discourse Abilities, 11, 182–198.
Katzenberger, I. (2004). The development of clause packaging in spoken and written texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 361, 1921–1948.
Kendon, A. (1987). On gesture: Its complementary relationship with speech. In A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (pp. 65–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality. In D. McNeill (Eds.), Language and gesture: Window into thought and action (pp. 47–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeil (Eds.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32.
Kita, S., Özyürek, A., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2007). Relations between syntactic encoding and co-speech gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8), 1212–1236.
Krauss, R.M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 71, 54–59.
Krauss, R.M., Dushay, R.A., Chen, Y., & Rausher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(6), 533–552.
Le Ny, J.-F. (1979). La sémantique psychologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lickiss, K.P., & Wellens, A.R. (1978). Effects of visual accessibility and hand restraint on fluency of gesticulator and effectiveness of message. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 461, 925–926.
Lund, K. (2003). Analyse de l’activité explicative en interaction: Étude de dialogues d’enseignants de physique en formation interprétant les interactions entre élèves. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Lyon.
Mazur-Palandre, A. (2009). Les connexions syntaxiques: Considérations contextuelles et développementales. In M. Sandré (Ed.), Analyses du discours et contextes: Quelles relations? (pp. 125–136). Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.
. (2010). Formes et positions syntaxiques du syntagme nominal: Une étude développementale du français scolaire en ZEP. Sciences Croisées, 61(Numéro thématique), 75–112.
. (2011). Le flux de l’information: Aspects syntaxiques et discursifs. Une étude fonctionnaliste et développementale. Berlin: Éditions universitaires européennes.
Mazur-Palandre, A., & Jisa, H. (2012). La lexicalité des productions orales et écrites: Une étude développementale. Enfance, 41, 359–371.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
. (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S.D. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Özcaliskan, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). When mothers do not lead their children by the hand. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla, & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 424–435). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Rabahi, T., Fargier, P., Rifai-Sarraj, A., Clouzeau, C. & Massarelli, R. (2012). Motor performance may be improved by kinesthetic imagery, specific action verb production, and mental calculation. NeuroReport, 23(2), 78–81.
Ravid, D. (2006). Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun scale analyses. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 791–821.
Ravid, D., & Berman, R.A. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity across adolescence: A text-embedded analysis. First Language, 30(1), 1–29.
Rimé, B. (1982). The elimination of visible behavior from social interactions: Effects on verbal, non verbal ans interpersonal variables. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 113–129.
Schneuwly, B. (1988). Le langage écrit chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Traxler, M., & Gernsbacher, M.A. (1995). Improving coherence in written communication. In M.A. Gernsbacher & T. Givón (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (pp. 215–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Veneziano, E., & Hudelot, C. (2002). Développement des compétences pragmatiques et théories de l’esprit chez l’enfant: Le cas de l’explication. In J. Bernicot, A. Trognon, M. Guidetti, & M. Musiol (Eds.), Pragmatique et psychologie (pp. 215–236). Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Veneziano, E., & Sinclair, H. (1995). Functional changes in early child language: The appearance of references to the past and of explanations. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 557–581.
Warren, A.R. & Tate, C.S. (1992). Egocentrism in children’s telephone conversations. In R.M. Diaz & L.E. Berk (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 245–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mazur Palandre, Audrey, Jean-Marc Colletta & Kristine Lund
2021. Alors, là, je vais vous expliquer comment on joue ! Explication procédurale finalisée dans une perspective développementale. Langages N° 221:1 ► pp. 123 ff. 
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey, Jean-Marc Colletta & Kristine Lund
2019. Chapitre 5. Gestes, paroles et prise en compte des contraintes interactionnelles dans l’explication enfantine à 6 ans. In Multimodalité du langage dans les interactions et l’acquisition, ► pp. 123 ff.
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey & Kristine Lund
2019. Chapitre 4. Explication « en comment » d’enfants de 6 ans : les relations temporelles et sémantiques entre les unités linguistiques et gestuelles. In Multimodalité du langage dans les interactions et l’acquisition, ► pp. 83 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.