Cover not available
Article published In:
The gesture–sign interface in language acquisition / L’interface geste–signe dans l’acquisition du langage
Edited by Aliyah Morgenstern and Michèle Guidetti
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8:1] 2017
► pp. 69–88

Deaf and hearing children’s picture naming

Impact of age of acquisition and language modality on representational gesture

| University of Birmingham
| City University of London
| University College London
| University of Chicago
| University of Birmingham
| City University of London
Stefanini, Bello, Caselli, Iverson, & Volterra (2009) reported that Italian 24–36 month old children use a high proportion of representational gestures to accompany their spoken responses when labelling pictures. The two studies reported here used the same naming task with (1) typically developing 24–46-month-old hearing children acquiring English and (2) 24–63-month-old deaf children of deaf and hearing parents acquiring British Sign Language (BSL) and spoken English. In Study 1 children scored within the range of correct spoken responses previously reported, but produced very few representational gestures. However, when they did gesture, they expressed the same action meanings as reported in previous research. The action bias was also observed in deaf children of hearing parents in Study 2, who labelled pictures with signs, spoken words and gestures. The deaf group with deaf parents used BSL almost exclusively with few additional gestures. The function of representational gestures in spoken and signed vocabulary development is considered in relation to differences between native and non-native sign language acquisition.
Keywords: gesture, sign language, language development, deaf
Article outline
  • 1.The gesture-language interface in early language development
    • 1.1How are gesture and language associated?
    • 1.2Cross-cultural picture naming studies
  • 2.Vocabulary development and gesture in deaf learners of sign language
  • 3.Experiments
    • 3.1Study 1
      • 3.1.1Method
        • Participants
        • Stimuli
        • Procedure
        • Spoken responses
        • Gesture production
        • Intercoder reliability
      • 3.1.2Results – study 1
        • Spoken language
        • Gesture production
      • 3.1.3Interim discussion
    • 3.2Study 2
      • 3.2.1Method
        • Participants
        • Procedure
        • Signed and Spoken targets
        • Gesture production
        • Intercoder reliability
      • 3.2.2Results – study 2
        • BSL comprehension
        • Picture production
        • Gesture production
        • BSL picture production vs. comprehension
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 16 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.8.1.04tho
References (38)
References
Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59(1), 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & Dick, F. (2002). Language, gesture, and the developing brain. Developmental Psychobiology 401, 293–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bello, A., Caselli, M. C., Pettenati, P., & Stefanini, S. (2010). PinG – Parole in Gioco. Una prova di comprensione e produzione lessicale per la prima infanzia. Firenze, Italy: Giunti O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Bello, A., Giannantoni, P., Pettenati, P., Stefanini, S., & Caselli, M. C. (2012). Assessing lexicon: Validation and developmental data of the Picture Naming Game (PiNG), a new picture naming task for toddlers. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 471, 589–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butcher, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Gesture and the transition from one- to two-word speech: When hand and mouth come together. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 235–257). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capirci, O., Pizzuto, E., & Volterra, V. (1996). Gesture and words during the transition to two-word speech. Journal of Child Language 231, 645–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2009). First Language Acquisition (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormier, K., Schembri, A., Vinson, D., & Orfanidou, E. (2012). First language acquisition differs from second language acquisition in prelingually deaf signers: Evidence from grammatical processing of British Sign Language. Cognition 1241, 50–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Pointing sets the stage for learning language – and creating language. Child Development 781, 741–745. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Volterra, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Learning to talk in a gesture rich world: Early communication of Italian vs. American children. First Language 28(2), 164–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.) (1998). The nature and functions of gesture in children's communications. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, J., Jones, A., & Morgan, G. (2016). The impact of input quality on early sign development in native and non-native language learners. Journal of Child Language 431, 537–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, W., Sheng, L., & Morgan, G. (2016). Lexical-semantic organization in bilingually developing deaf children with ASL-dominant language exposure: Evidence from a repeated meaning association task. Language Learning 66(4), 872–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, R. I., & Eichen, E. B. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 301, 486–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A. (2004). Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 4(2), 138–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mumford, K., & Kita, S. (2014). Children use gesture to interpret novel verb meanings. Child Development 851, 1181–1189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science 141, 11–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, E., & Meier, R. (1985). The acquisition of American Sign Language. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data (pp. 881–938). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, A. W. (1995). Using representations: Comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child Development 66(4), 999–1010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orlansky, M. D., & Bonvillian, J. D. (1984). The role of iconicity in early sign language acquisition. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 491, 287–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalişkan, S. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition 96 (B101-113).Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, S., Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Do iconic gestures pave the way for children's early verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6), 1143–1162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perez, M., Valsameda, M., & Morgan, G. (2015). Bilingual sign education in Madrid, Spain. In. G. Tang, H. Knoors & M. Marschark. Bilingualism and Bilingual Deaf Education (pp. 602–645). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Özyürek, A., & Morgan, G. (2015). The influence of the visual modality on language structure and language conventionalization: Insights from sign language and gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science 7(1), 2–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pettenati, P., Stefanini, S., & Volterra, V. (2010). Motoric characteristics of representational gestures produced by young children in a naming task. Journal of Child Language 371, 887–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pettenati, P., Sekine K., Congestrì, E., & Volterra, V. (2012). A comparative study on representational gestures in Italian and Japanese children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 36(2), 149–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanini S., Bello A., Caselli M. C., Iverson J. M., & Volterra, V. (2009). Co-speech gestures in a naming task: developmental data. Language and Cognitive Processes 241, 168–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., Woll, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). The road to language learning is iconic: evidence from British Sign Language. Psychological Science 23(12), 1443–1448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volterra, V., & Erting. C. J. (Eds.). (1994). From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation: An organismic developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Woolfe, T., Herman, R., Roy, P., & Woll, B. (2010). Early vocabulary development in deaf native signers: A British Sign Language adaptation of the communicative development inventories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 511, 322–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woll, B. (2013). Sign language and spoken language development in young children: Measuring vocabulary by means of the CDI. In L. Meurant, A. Sinte, M. van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Sign language research, uses and practices: Crossing views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics (pp. 15–34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter & Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Naranjo-Zeledón, Luis, Mario Chacón-Rivas, Jesús Peral & Antonio Ferrández
2020. Phonological Proximity in Costa Rican Sign Language. Electronics 9:8 ► pp. 1302 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.