Review published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 11:1 (2011) ► pp.136143
References (11)
References
Grosjean, F. 2001. “The Bilingual’s Language Modes”. In One Mind, Two Languages, J. L. Nicol (ed), 1–22. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. and Abrahamsson, N. 2003. “Maturational constraints in second language acquisition”. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds), 539–588. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kranich, S. 2008. The progressive in Modern English. A corpus-based study of its grammaticalization and related changes. Doctoral Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Kagan, O. 2007. “Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom”. Language and Linguistics Compass 1/5: 368–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M. S., Köpke, B., Keijzer, M. and Weilemar, L. (eds). 2004. First Language Attrition. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Methodological Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. and Kaufman, T. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, F. 2000. A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft. 2009. Special Issue on Early Second Language Acquisition, 28:1.Google Scholar