Review published In:
Contrastive Linguistics and other Approaches to Language Comparison
Edited by Matthias Hüning and Barbara Schlücker
[Languages in Contrast 12:1] 2012
► pp. 93101
Büring, D.
2008 “What’s New (and What’s Given) in the Theory of Focus?”. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Meeting 2008. Berkeley CA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, K. É.
1998 “Identificational vs. Information Focus”. Language 74 (2): 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M.
2006 “Association with Focus Phrases”. In The Architecture of Focus, eds. V. Molnár and S. Winkler. 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, C. and Thompson, S.
1976 “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language”. In Subject and Topic, ed. C. Li. 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. and J. Hirschberg
1990 “The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse”. In Intentions in Communication, eds. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. Pollack. 271–311. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Riester, A., and H. Kamp
2010 “Squiggly Issues: Alternative Sets, Complex DPs, and Intensionality. In Logic, Language and Meaning”. Revised Selected Papers from the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, eds. M. Aloni et al.. 374–383. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Rooth, M.
1992 “A Theory of Focus Interpretation”. Natural Language Semantics 1 (1): 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, R.
1999 “GIVENness, AvoidF, and other Constraints on the Placement of Accent”. Natural Language Semantics 7 (2): 141–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steedman, M.
1991 “Structure and Intonation”. Language 671: 260–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, E.
1992The Informational Component. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E., and E. Engdahl
1996 “The Linguistic Realization of Information Packaging”. Linguistics 341: 459–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar