Evaluative language in medical discourse
A contrastive study between English and Spanish university lectures
Academic spoken discourse has been a dominant issue for discourse studies researchers for the last 25 years or so. Different spoken academic genres have been analysed (Swales, 1990, 2004; Berkenkotter and Huckin, 1995; Bhatia, 2001, 2002; Mauranen, 2001; Juzwik, 2004; Crawford-Camiciottoli, 2004, 2007; among others) thanks to the compilation and the easy access to electronic spoken corpora. This study focuses on the genre of lecture as “the central ritual of the culture of learning” (Benson, 1994) in higher education. Here, I analyse the use of evaluative language in medical discourse lectures. A contrastive study between Spanish and English medical lectures is carried out. To my knowledge, little attention has been paid to the analysis of evaluative language in medical discourse. The present study employs a quantitative and a qualitative approach to analyse four Spanish and English medical discourse lectures with an average of 35,000 words. The English lectures have been taken from the Michigan Corpus of Academic and Spoken English (MICASE) and the Spanish lectures have been recorded and transcribed in the Degree in Medicine course at a Spanish university for the purpose of this study. Corpus analysis tools have been used to analyse attitudinal language expressing explicit evaluation. The findings show similarities and also differences in the use of evaluative markers in academic medical discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Background
- 1.2Choice of features to be analysed
- 2.The study
- 2.1Methodology
- 2.2The data
- 2.3Context and procedure
- 3.Results
- 3.1Relevance markers in the EC
- 3.2Relevance markers in the SC
- 3.3Evaluative adjectives in the EC
- 3.4Evaluative adjectives in the SC
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Alba-Juez, L. and Thompson, G.
Alba-Juez, L.
2015 La Pragmática Contrastiva y su Importancia para la Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras.
Proceedings of the XXV ASELE International Conference: La Enseñanza de ELE Centrada en el Alumno. Madrid
17–20 September 2014 Asociación para la Enseñanza del Español como Lengua Extranjera. 15–24.
Anthony, L.
2014 AntConc (
Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available at
[URL] [last accessed October 2014]
Bellés-Fortuño, B.
2004 The Influence of Lecturing Styles in the Use of Discourse Markers within the Spoken Academic Discourse of Social Sciences. In
Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis,
M. Labarta (ed), 1–21. Valencia: Publicaciones Universidad de Valencia
Bellés-Fortuño, B.
2008 A Spoken Academic Discourse Contrastive Study: DMs in North-American and Spanish lectures.
RESLA 21. AESLA Research Award 2008.
Bellés-Fortuño, B. and Querol-Julián, M.
2010 Evaluation in Research Article Abstracts: a Cross-cultural Study between Spanish and English Medical Discourse. In
Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives and Applications to Written Academic Discourse,
R. Lorés-Sanz,
P. Mur-Dueñas and
E. Lafuente-Millán (eds), 83–98. Cambridge. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bellés-Fortuño, B.
2016a Academic Discourse Markers: a Contrastive Analysis of the Discourse Marker then in English and Spanish Lectures.
Verbeia 11:57–78.
Bellés-Fortuño, B.
2016b Popular Science Articles vs. Scientific Articles: a Tool for Medical Education. In
Medical Discourse in Professional, Academic and Popular Settings,
P. Ordoñez-Lopez and
N. Edo-Marza (eds), 55–75. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Barton, E. L.
1993 Evidentials, Argumentation, and Epistemological Stance.
College English 55(7):745–769.
Benson, M. J.
1994 Lecture Listening in an Ethnographic Perspective. In
Academic Listening: Research Perspectives,
J. Flowerdew (ed), 181–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N.
1995 Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bhatia, V.
2001 Analysing Genre: some Conceptual Issues. In
Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications,
M. Hewings (ed), 79–92. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham Press.
Bhatia, V.
2002 A Generic View of Academic Discourse. In
Academic Discourse,
J. Flowerdew (ed), 21–39. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Biber, D.
2006 Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(2): 97–116.
Crawford-Camiciottoli, B.
2004 Audience-oriented Relevance Markers in Business Studies Lectures. In
Academic discourse – New insights into evaluation,
G. del Lungo Camiciotti and
E. Tognini Bonelli (eds), 81–97. Bern: Peter Lang.
Crawford-Camiciottoli, B.
DeCarrico, J. and Nattinger, J. R.
1988 Lexical Phrases for the Comprehension of Academic Lectures.
English for Specific Purposes 7(2): 91–102.
Deroey, K. L. B. and Taverniers, M.
2011 A Corpus Cased Study of Lecture Functions.
Moderna Språk 105(2):1–22.
Deroey, K. L. B. and Taverniers, M.
2012 Just Remember this: Lexicogrammatical Relevance Markers in Lectures.
English for Specific Purposes 311:221–233.
Fraser, B. and Malamud-Makowski, M.
1996 English and Spanish Contrastive Discourse Markers.
Language Sciences 18(3–4):863–881.
Fraser, B.
1999 What are Discourse Markers? Journal of Pragmatics 311:931–952.
Fraser, B.
2004 An Account of Discourse Markers. In
Current Trends in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics,
P. Garcés,
R. Gómez,
L. Fernández and
M. Padilla (eds), 13–34. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hunston, S.
1994 Evaluation and Organisation in a Sample of Written Academic Discourse. In
Advances in Written Text Analysis,
M. Coulthard (ed.), 191–218. London: Routledge.
Hunston, S.
2000 Evaluation in the Planes of Discourse: Status and Value in Persuasive Texts. In
Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse,
S. Hunston and
G. Thompson (eds), 177–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunston, S. and Sinclair, J.
2000 A Local Grammar of Evaluation. In
Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse,
S. Hunston and
G. Thompson (eds), 74‒101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K.
1998 Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Discourse.
Journal of Pragmatics 301:437–455.
Hyland, K.
1999 Disciplinary Discourses: Writer Stance in Research Articles. In
Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices,
C. N. Candlin and
K. Hyland (eds), 99–121. London: Longman.
Hyland, K.
2000 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K.
2001 Bringing the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles.
Writing Communication 18(4):549–574.
Hyland, K.
2004 Engagements and Disciplinarity: the Other Side of Evaluation. In
Academic Discourse – New Insights into Evaluation,
G. del Lungo Camiciotti and
E. Tognini Bonelli (eds), 13–30. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hyland, K.
2010 Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 91:116–127.
Juzwik, M. M.
2004 The Dialogization of Genres in Teaching Narrative: Theorizing Hybrid Genres in Classroom Discourse.
Across the Disciplines 11. Available at
[URL] [last accessed 15 August 2016]
König, E. and Gast, V.
2009 Understanding English-German Contrasts. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
Llorente, M. T.
1996 Organizadores de la Conversación. Operadores Discursivos en Español. Salamanca: Publicaciones Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca.
Mauranen, A.
2001 Reflexive Academic Talk: Observations from MICASE. In
Corpus Linguistics in North America (
Selections from the 1999 Symposium),
R. C. Simpson and
J. M. Swales (eds), 165–178. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Mauranen, A.
2002 A Good Question: Expressing Evaluation in Academic Speech. In
Domain-specific English: Textual Practices across Communication and Classrooms,
G. Cortese and
P. Riley (eds), 115–140. Bern: Peter Lang.
Mauranen, A.
2003 “But there’s a flawed argument”. Socialisation into and through Metadiscourse. In
Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use,
C. F. Meyer and
P. Leistyna (eds), 19–34. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Poppi, F.
2004 Boosters and Hedges: two Sides of the Same Coin? A Case Study of a Small Corpus of Economics Textbooks. In
Evaluation in Oral and Written Academic Discourse,
L. Anderson and
J. Bamford (eds), 137–150. Rome: Office Edizioni.
Portolés, J.
1998 Marcadores del Discurso. Barcelona: Ariel Practicum.
Schiffrin, D.
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, P.
2004 How to Recognize Implicit Evaluation in Academic Book Reviews? In
Academic Discourse: New Insights into Evaluation,
G. del Lungo Camicciotti and
E. Tognini Bonelli (eds), 121–139. Bern: Peter Lang.
Siepmann, D.
2005 Discourse Markers across Languages. London: Routledge.
Simpson, R. C.; Briggs, S. L.; Ovens, J. and Swales, J. M.
2002 The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
Stotesbury, H.
2003 Evaluation in Research Article Abstracts in the Narrative and Hard Sciences.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 21:327–341.
Swales, J. M.
1990 Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M.
2001 Metatalk in American Academic Talk.
Journal of English Linguistics, 29(1):34–53.
Swales, J. M. and Malczewski, B.
2001 Discourse Management and New-episode Flags in MICASE. In
Corpus Linguistics in North America (
Selections from the 1999 Symposium),
R. C. Simpson and
J. M. Swales (eds.), 145–164. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press,
Swales, J. M. and Burke, A.
2003 “It’s really fascinating work”: Differences in Evaluative Adjectives across Registers. In
Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use,
C. F. Meyer and
P. Leistyna (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Swales, J. M.
2004 Evaluation in Academic Speech. First Forays. In
Academic Discourse: New Insights into Evaluation,
G. del Lungo Camiciotti and
Tognini Bonelli (eds), 31–50. Bern: Peter Lang.
Taboada, M.; Doval, S. and González, E.
2013 Contrastive Discourse Analysis: Functional and Corpus Perspectives. Sheffield: Equinox.
Thetela, P.
1997 Evaluated Entities and Parameters of Value in Academic Research Articles.
English for Specific Purposes 16(2). 101–118.
Thompson, G. and Hunston, S.
2000 Evaluation: an Introduction. In
Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse,
S. Hunston and
G. Thompson (eds), 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, G. and Alba-Juez, L.
2014 Evaluation in Context.
Pragmatics and Beyond New Series. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Webber, P.
2004 Negotiation in Linguistic Papers. In
Academic discourse – New insights into evaluation,
G. del Lungo Camiciotti and
E. Tognini Bonelli (eds), 181–202. Bern: Peter Lang.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Farnia, Maryam, Masoud Saeedi & Zahra Ataei
2020.
A Cross-disciplinary Study on Evaluative Strategies in Research Articles Conclusion Sections.
International Journal of Research in English Education 5:1
► pp. 1 ff.
Hu, Guangwei & Yanhua Liu
2018.
Three minute thesis presentations as an academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of genre moves.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 35
► pp. 16 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.