Article published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 17:2 (2017) ► pp. 255278
References

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y. and R. M. W. Dixon
(eds.) 2003Studies in Evidentiality [Typological studies in language, vol. 54]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2003Evidentiality in typological perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in Evidentiality [Typological studies in language, vol. 54]. 33–62. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. and Bylund, E.
2013Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37: 286–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T.
2008Motion events in Danish and Spanish: A focus on form pedagogical approach. In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar, S. De Knop and T. de Rycker (eds.), 259–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. and Robinson, P.
2009Language typology, task complexity and the development of L2 lexicalisation patterns for describing motion events. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 246–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B.
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edition). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
2003Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crosthwaite, P. R.
2014Definite discourse-new reference in L1 and L2: A study of bridging in Mandarin, Korean, and English. Language Learning 64 (3): 456–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csató, É. Á.
2009Rendering Evidential Meanings in Turkish and Swedish. In Turcological Letters to Bernt Brendemoen [The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture Oslo Serie B: Skrifter 132], É. Á. Csató, G. Ims, J. Parslow, F. Thiesen and E. Türker (eds.), 77–86. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Dryer, M.
1992The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fausey, C. M. and Boroditsky, L.
2010Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(5): 644–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18 (1): 150–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L.
1999Language-specific Expression of Motion and its Use in Narrative Texts. Master’s dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
[ p. 275 ]
2002Verbs of Motion: Structural Perspectives. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2006Weaving the web of meaning. Languages in Contrast 6 (1): 151–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007aTalking about Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bLanguage as a witness: Insights from cognitive linguistics. Speech, Language and the Law 14 (2): 245–267.Google Scholar
2008Typology in action: Applying insights from typological contrasts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18 (1): 42–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Motion events in semantic typology and eyewitness interviews. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 300–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010aTypology meets witness narratives and memory: Theory and practice entwined in cognitive linguistics. In Cognitive Linguistics in Action: Theory to Application and Back, E. Tabakowska, M. Choinski and L. Wiraszka (eds.), 269–291. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010bThe importance of being a prefix. In Slavic Verbs of Motion, V. D. Hasko and R. Perelmutter (eds.), 247–266. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: Bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion events. International Journal of Bilingualism 15 (4): 466–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bTypology as a continuum: Intratypological evidence from English and Serbo-Croatian. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing Series 41], J. Goschler and A. Stefanowitsch (eds.), 17–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aConstructing causation in language and memory: Implications for access to justice in multilingual interactions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 20 (1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013cThe role of language in legal contexts: A forensic cross-linguistic viewpoint. In Law and Language [Current Legal Issues 15], M. Freeman and F. Smith (eds.), 328–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Applying language typology: Practical applications of research on typological contrasts between languages. In Motion and Space across Languages and Applications [Human Cognitive Processing Series], I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 399–418. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Speaking in L2 but thinking in L1: Language-specific effects on memory for causation events in English and Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L. and Hawkins, J. A.
2013Multiple factors in second language acquisition: The CASP model. Linguistics 51 (1): 145–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L. and Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2015Motion. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 39], E. Dabrowska and D. Divjak (eds.), 526–545. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L. and Vidaković, I.
2010Typology in the L2 classroom: Second language acquisition from a typological perspective. In Inside the Learner’s Mind: Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition, M. Pütz and L. Sicola (eds.), 269–291. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 276 ]
Gilquin, G.
2008Combining contrastive and interlanguage analysis to apprehend transfer: detection, explanation, evaluation. In Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, G. Gilquin, S. Papp and M. B. Díez-Bedmar (eds), 3–34. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
2009Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H.
1963Some universals of grammar with particular reference to order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, J. H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1966Language Universals with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hasko, V. D.
2010The role of thinking for speaking in adult L2 speech: The case of (non)unidirectionality encoding by American learners of Russian. In Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking, T. Cadierno and Z. -H. Han (eds.), 34–58. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hawkins, E.
1984Awareness of Language: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A.
1983Word Order Universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.
1986The Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A.
1994A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Cross-linguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov and E. Moravcsik (eds.), 54–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. and Filipović, L.
2012Criterial Features in L2 English: Specifying the Reference Levels of the Common European Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A.
2015Acquisition of motion events in L2 Spanish by German, French and Italian speakers. Language Learning Journal. Published on line 29th July 2015 doi: Crossref.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J.
2015Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development be? Language Learning 65: 210–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2009Path salience in motion events. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura and S. Őzçalışkan (eds.), 403–414. NewYork: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. and Filipović, L.
2013Lexicalization patterns and translation. In Cognitive Linguistics and Translation, A. Rojo and I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (eds.), 253–284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. and Hijazo-Gascón, A.
2012Variation in Motion Events: Theory and applications. In Space and Time across Languages and Cultures – Volume 1: Linguistic Diversity, L. Filipović and K. M. Jaszczolt (eds), 349–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, C.
1990 [1980]Contrastive Analysis. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
[ p. 277 ]
Jarvis, S. and Pavlenko, A.
2008Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E.
1983Now you see it, now you don’t. In Language Transfer in Language Learning, S. Gass and L. Selinker (eds.), 112–134. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
König, E. and Gast, V.
2007Understanding English-German Contrasts. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. and Vigliocco, G.
2008Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (4): 843–858.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, I. and Olshtain, E.
1996Explicit contrastive instruction facilitates the acquisition of difficult L2 forms. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to Language Awareness, Special Issue of Language Awareness 5 (3–4): 149–165.Google Scholar
Lado, R.
1957Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Lai, V. T., Garrido Rodriguez, G. and Narasimhan, B.
2014Thinking-for-speaking in early and late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17: 139–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H.
1995Syntax, semantics, pragmatic. In Grammar and Meaning, F. Palmer (ed.), 48–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, R.
2010Are we born racist? Inside the science of stigma, prejudice and intergroup relations. www​.psychologytoday​.com​/blog​/are​-we​-born​-racist​/201012​/linguisticforensics.
Moravcsik, E.
2013Introducing Language Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W.
2015Processing determinism. Language Learning 65: 6–32 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T.
1989Language Transfer. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A.
2014The Bilingual Mind and What it Tells us about Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rhoades-Ko, Y. -H.
2013Second Language Acquisition of Korean Evidentiality in Expressions of Psychological State of Mind. PhD Thesis, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Roehr, K. and Ganem-Gutierrez, G. A.
(eds.) 2013The Metalinguistic Dimension in Instructed Second Language Learning. London: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E.
1921Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1996Two ways to travel: verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, M. Shibatani and S. A. Thompson (eds.), 195–220. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1997Mind, code, and text. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, J. Bybee, J. Haiman and S. Thompson (eds.), 437–467. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Language in Mind, D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), 157–191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Strömqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds.), 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2006What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds.), 59–81. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 278 ]
Soroli, E., Sahraoui, H. and Sacchett, C.
2012Linguistic encoding of motion events in English and French: Typological constraints on second language acquisition and agrammatic aphasia. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 3 (2): 261–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tosun, S., Vaid, J., and Geraci, L.
2013Does obligatory linguistic marking of source of evidence affect source memory? A Turkish/English investigation. Journal of Memory and Language 69, 121–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P.
2011Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trujillo, J.
2003The difference in resulting judgments when descriptions use high-manner versus neutral-manner verbs. Senior dissertation. University of California BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Vidaković, I.
2006Second language acquisition of dynamic spatial relations. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Filipović, Luna
2019.  In Bilingualism in Action, Crossref logo
Filipović, Luna
2019. Police interviews. Pragmatics and Society 10:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto
2019. Translating accurately or sounding natural?. Pragmatics and Society 10:1  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto
2021.  In Police Interviews [Benjamins Current Topics, 118], Crossref logo
Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,  pp. 767 ff. Crossref logo
Rasulić, Katarina
2020. Piquer-Píriz, A. M. & R. Alejo-González (Eds.). (2018). Applying Cognitive Linguistics. Figurative Language in Use, Constructions and Typology . Metaphor and the Social World 10:1  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo
Unknown (not yet matched)
2021.  In Police Interviews [Benjamins Current Topics, 118], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.