Article published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 19:2 (2019) ► pp. 205231


Aijmer, K.
(ed.) 2009Contrastive Pragmatics. Special Issue of Languages in Contrast 9(1).Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. and Lewis, D.
(eds) 2017Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-Pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres. Cham: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.
2003Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Behrens, B., Fabricius-Hansen, C. and Solfjeld, K.
2012Competing Structures. The Discourse Perspective. In Big Events, Small Clauses. The Grammar of Elaboration, C. Fabricius-Hansen and D. Haug (eds), 179–225, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chesterman, A.
1998Contrastive Functional Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W.
1981Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dürscheid, C.
1989Zur Vorfeldbesetzung in deutschen Verbzweit-Strukturen. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, C. and Ramm, W.
2008Editors’ Introduction. In ‘Subordination’ versus ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text, C. Fabricius-Hansen and W. Ramm (eds), 1–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, C. and Haug, D.
(eds) 2012Big Events, Small Clauses. The Grammar of Elaboration. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, A.
2008Theme Zones in English Media Discourse. Forms and Functions. Journal of Pragmatics 40(9): 1543–1568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Challenges in Contrast. Languages in Contrast 9(1): 73–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Structuring of Discourse. In Handbooks of Pragmatics. The Pragmatics of Speech Actions. Vol. 2, M. Sbisà and K. Turner (eds), 685–711. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The Dynamics of Discourse: Quantity Meets Quality. In Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse, P. Cap and M. Dynel (eds), 235–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018The Linguistic Realisation of Contrastive Discourse Relations in Context: Contextualisation and discourse common ground. Modélisation et utilisation du contexte / Modeling and Using Context 2(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Fetzer, A. and Speyer, A.
2012Discourse Relations in English and German Discourse: Local and Not-So-Local Constraints. Intercultural Pragmatics 9(4): 413–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fries, P. H.
1994On Theme, Rheme and Discourse Goals. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, M. Coulthard (ed), 229–249. Lomndon: routledge.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. and Givón, T.
(eds) 1995Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1993English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction, 2 Vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1975Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. III, P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994Introduction to English Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. and Halliday, M.
1987Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. and Mackenzie, L.
2008Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hützen, N. and Serbina, T.
2018Lexical Chains and Topic Continuity in the Register of Popular Scientific Writing: German-English Contrasts. Pragmatics and Society 9(1): 8–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koch, P. and Oesterreicher, W.
2007Schriftlichkeit und kommunikative Distanz. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35: 346–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krzeszowski, T.
1989Towards a Typology of Contrastive studies. In Contrastive Pragmatics, W. Oleksy (ed), 55–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kunz, K., Degaetano-Ortlieb, S., Lapshinova-Koltunski, E., Menzel, K. and Steiner, E.
2017English-German contrasts in cohesion and implications for translation. In Empirical Translation Studies, Sutter, G., Lefer, M. and Delaere, I. (eds), 265–311. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
1979Activity Types and Language. Linguistics 17: 365–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maier, R. M., Hofmockel, C. and Fetzer, A.
2016The Negotiation of Discourse Relations in Context: Co-Constructing Degrees of Overtness. Intercultural Pragmatics 13(1): 71–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, V.
1991Das TOPIK im Deutschen und im Ungarischen. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J.
2001Calculation for the Chi-Square Test: An Interactive Calculation Tool for Chi-Square Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence [Computer software]. Available from http://​quantpsy​.org
Reis, M.
1997Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, C. Dürscheid, K.-H. Ramers and M. Schwarz (eds), 121–144. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Shaer, B. and Frey, W.
2004‘Integrated’ and ‘Non-Integrated’ Left-peripheral Elements in German and English. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop. ZASPiL 35(2), B. Shaer, W. Frey and C. Maienborn (eds), 465–502. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Speyer, A.
2009Das Vorfeldranking und das Vorfeld-es. Linguistische Berichte 219, 323–353.Google Scholar
Speyer, A. and Fetzer, A.
2014The Coding of Discourse Relations in English and German Argumentative Discourse. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence. Theories and Applications, H. Gruber and G. Redeker (eds), 87–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2018 “Well would you believe it, I have failed the exam again“: Discourse Relations in English and German Personal narratives. Pragmatics in Society 9(1), 26–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, P.
2003Contextualization and Social Meaning-Making Practices. In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, S. Eerdmans et al.. (eds), 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G.
2014Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third Edition. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H.
2004Text, Context, and Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar