Article published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 20:1 (2020) ► pp.130
References
Aronoff, M.
1976Word formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. & F. Anshen
1998Morphology and the lexicon: Lexicalization and productivity. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell. 237–247.Google Scholar
Bauer, L.
2001Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L., R. Lieber & I. Plag
2013The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burani, C. & A. M. Thornton
2003The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (eds.), Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 157–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chanpira, E. I.
1966Ob okkazional’nom slove i okkazional’nom slovoobrazovanii (On occasional word and occasional word formation). In E. A. Zemskaja & D. N. Šmelev (eds.), Razvitie slovoobrazovanija sovremennogo russkogo jazyka (Development of word formation of present Russian language). Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P.
1933La formation des noms en grec ancien. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Christofidou, A.
1994Okkasionalismen in poetischen Texten: Eine Fallstudie am Werk von O. Elytis. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Conti, S. & E. Mattiello
2008Extra-grammatical morphology: English acronyms and initialisms. In M. Bertuccelli Papi, A. Bertacca & S. Bruti (eds.), Threads in the Complex Fabric of Language: Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honour of Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi. Pisa: Felici Editore. 559–573.Google Scholar
Cutler, A.
1980Productivity in word formation. Chicago Linguistics Society 161, 45–51.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
1996The French Influence on Middle English Morphology. A Corpus-based Study of Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Debrunner, A.
1917Griechische Wortbildungslehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Dell’Anna, M. V. & P. Lala
2004I neologismi politici e la formazione delle parole. Mi consenta un girotondo. Lingua e lessico della Seconda Repubblica 221, 101–143, available at [URL]
Doleschal, U. & A. M. Thornton
(eds.) 2000Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U.
1999What is natural in Natural Morphology (NM)? Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 31, 135–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Productivity in word formation. In G. Jarema & G. Libben (eds.), The Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives. Amsterdam: Brill. 159–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & M. Ladányi
2000Productivity in word formation (WF): A morphological approach. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 471, 103–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & B. Tumfart
2017aJohann Nepomuk Nestroy (1801–1862) als großer Wortbildner: Neue korpuslinguistische Ansätze für die Auswertung okkasionalistischer Neubildungen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 47(4), 563–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017bNew corpus-linguistic approaches to the investigation of poetic occasionalisms: The case of Johann Nepomuk Nestroy. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic meeting 31, 155–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
English Web 2015 (enTenTen15) (online) Available at Sketch Engine, [URL]
Fleischer, W.
1975Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, Fourth edition. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gaeta, L. & D. Ricca
2003Frequency and productivity in Italian derivation: A comparison between corpus-based and lexicographical data. Rivista di Linguistica 15(1), 63–98.Google Scholar
Italian Web 2016 (itTenTen16) (online) Available at Sketch Engine, [URL]
Jespersen, O.
1942A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI: Morphology. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D.
1986The problem of productivity in word formation. Linguistics 241, 585–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G.
1998Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language 611, 30–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo Duca, M. G.
2004Nomi di agente. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 191–218.Google Scholar
Mattiello, E.
2013Extra-grammatical Morphology in English: Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattiello, E. & W. U. Dressler
Forthc. The morphosemantic transparency/opacity of novel English analogical compounds and compound families. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia.
Mattiello, E.
2017Analogy in Word-formation. A Study of English Neologisms and Occasionalisms. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, L.
2007Il fenomeno delle sigle: Un primo schema di analisi. In G. Garzone & R. Salvi (eds.), Linguistica, linguaggi specialistici, didattica delle lingue: Studi in onore di Leo Schena. Roma: CISU. 37–47.Google Scholar
Marchand, H.
1969The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
OED Oxford English Dictionary (online). Oxford: Oxford University Press, [URL]
OPUS2 English (online) Available at Sketch Engine [URL]
OPUS2 Italian (online) Available at Sketch Engine [URL]
Plag, I.
1999Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidl, C.
2004Deantroponimici. In M. Grossmann & F. Rainer (eds.), La formazione delle parole in italiano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 409–419.Google Scholar
Treccani (online) [URL]
Wolf, H. J.
1972It. romanista, quattrocentista: Antwendungsbereiche eines “gelehrten” Suffixes im Italienischen, Spanischen und Französischen. Romanische Forschungen 841, 314–367.Google Scholar
ZING: Lo Zingarelli con cd-rom. Vocabolario della Lingua Italiana di Nicola Zingarelli (2015), M. Cannella & B. Lazzarini (eds.). Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Micheli, M. Silvia
2023. Linee di tendenza aggiornate della formazione di parola dell’italiano contemporaneo. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.