References

References

Baayen, R. H. and Lieber, R.
1991Productivity and English Derivation: A Corpus-Based Study. Linguistics 29(5): 801–844. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
1993On Frequency, Transparency and Productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. In Corpus Linguistics, A. Lüdeling, M. Kytö and M. Kytö (eds), 899–919. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baroni, M. and Evert, S.
2014The ZipfR Package for Lexical Statistics: A Tutorial Introduction. Available at http://​zipfr​.r​-forge​.r​-project​.org​/materials​/zipfrtutorial​.pdf [last accessed 1 June 2019].
Craig, C. G.
1991Ways to Go in Rama: A Case Study in Polygrammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization. Volume II. Types of grammatical markers, E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds), 455–492. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Sutter, G.
2005Rood, Groen, Corpus! Een Taalgebruiksgebaseerde Analyse van Woordvolgordevariatie in Tweeledige Werkwoordelijke Eindgroepen. PhD Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
Dik, S. C.
1987Copula Auxiliarization: How and Why? In Historical Development of Auxiliaries, M. Harris and P. Ramat (eds), 53–84. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, L. and Ricca, D.
2006Productivity in Italian Word Formation: A Variable-Corpus Approach. Linguistics 44(1): 57–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guehria, W.
2011La Structure Attributive avec devenir comme Construction Marquée dans l’Ensemble Sous-Déterminé des Phrases de Forme NVétat Adj . Langue Française 171(3): 135–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. A.
1980Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V.
2014The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laca, B.
2000Auxiliarisation et Copularisation. Revue de Linguistique Romane 64: 427–443.Google Scholar
Raineri, S.
2010Analyse Contrastive Français-Anglais du Passif dans une Perspective Constructionnelle : Sens et Fonction de BE Ven, ETRE Vé, GET Ven et SE FAIRE Ver . PhD Thesis, Université de la Sorbonne nouvelle – Paris III.Google Scholar
Sansò, A. and Ramat, A. G.
2015Deictic Motion Verbs as Passive Auxiliaries: The Case of Italian andare ‘go’ and venire ‘come’. Transactions of the Philological Society 114(1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sleeman, P.
2014From Participle to Adjective in Germanic and Romance. In Adjectives in Germanic and Romance, P. Sleeman, F. Van de Velde and H. Perridon (eds), 171–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H.
2009Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeldes, A.
2012Productivity in Argument Selection from Morphology to Syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar