Article published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 22:1 (2022) ► pp. 114–135

Contrastive grammar in the Renaissance

The subtle presence of Greek in Jean Pillot’s French grammar (1550/1561)

| KU Leuven , Belgium | University of Oslo , Norway

This paper focuses on how Jean Pillot, author of the most popular French grammar of the sixteenth century in terms of editions, took efforts to contrast his native language with Greek. His Gallicæ linguæ institutio (1550/1561), although written in Latin, contains numerous passages where Pillot subtly confronted French with Greek, surveyed in Section 2, in order to give his audience of educated German speakers a clearer view of the idiosyncrasies of French. In Section 3, I analyze why he preferred Greek to the other languages he knew in quite a number of cases, arguing that this subtle contrastive endeavor bore an indirect pedagogical and ideological load. Section 4 discusses the terminological means Pillot used to confront Greek with French, and their origins. In Section 5, I frame Pillot’s appropriation of Greek grammar in the long history of contrastive language studies, with special reference to the pivotal role of sixteenth-century linguistic analysis.

Keywords: long history of contrastive linguistics, sixteenth century, Jean Pillot, French/Greek
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.French and Greek in contrast: Pillot’s data
  • 3.Hellenizing the vernacular: A linguistic backing for imagined socio-cultural ties
  • 4.Pillot’s contrastive metalanguage
  • 5.Outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 07 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.21008.van
References

Databases

BREPOLiS Cross Database Searchtool
Available at http://​clt​.brepolis​.net​/cds​/pages​/Search​.aspx [last accessed 29 March 2021].
Universal Short Title Catalogue
Available at https://​www​.ustc​.ac​.uk/ [last accessed 22 March 2021].

Primary sources

De Keyser, J.
(ed.) 2015–2016 Francesco Filelfo. Collected Letters. Epistolarum Libri XLVIII. 41 vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Keil, H.
(ed.) 1855–1880 Grammatici Latini. 71 vols. Lipsiae: in aedibus B. G. Teubneri.Google Scholar
Palsgrave, J.
1530 Lesclarcissement de la langue francoyse. [S.l.]: Johan Haukyns.Google Scholar
Pillot, J.
1550 Gallicæ linguæ institutio, Latino sermone conscripta. Parisiis: Ex officina Stephani Groulleau.Google Scholar
1561 Gallicæ linguæ institutio, Latino sermone conscripta. Parisiis: Apud Stephanum Grouleau.Google Scholar
Sylvius, J.
1531 In linguam Gallicam isagωge […]. Parisiis: Ex officina Roberti Stephani.Google Scholar
Valence, P.
1528 Introductions in frensshe […]. [London]: [Wynkyn de Worde]. [Facsimile 1967 Menston: Scolar Press.]Google Scholar

Secondary literature

Auroux, S.
1992 Introduction: Le processus de grammatisation et ses enjeux. In Histoire des idées linguistiques, S. Auroux (ed.), vol. 21, 11–64. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Biville, F.
2018 Multilingualism in the Roman World. Oxford Handbooks Online. Available at https://​www​.oxfordhandbooks​.com​/view​/10​.1093​/oxfordhb​/9780199935390​.001​.0001​/oxfordhb​-9780199935390​-e​-101 [last accessed 5 November 2021].
Colombat, B.
(ed.) 2003a Jean Pillot. Institution de la langue française | Gallicae linguae institutio (1561). Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
2003b La Gallicae linguae institutio de Jean Pillot: Comment adapter le cadre grammatical latin à la description du français. In Lyon et l’illustration de la langue française, G. Defaux (ed.), 77–107. Lyon: ENS.Google Scholar
2013 L’héritage du modèle latin dans les grammaires françaises à la Renaissance. Documents pour l’histoire du français langue étrangère ou seconde 511: 11–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Considine, J. and Van Hal, T.
2010 Introduction: Classifying and Comparing Languages in Post-Renaissance Europe (1600–1800). Language & History 531: 63–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demaizière, C.
1982 La langue à la recherche de ses origines: La mode des étymologies grecques. Bulletin de l’Association d’étude sur l’humanisme, la réforme et la renaissance 151: 65–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 Une contrainte de l’héritage latin: Le difficile classement de l’article chez les grammairiens français du XVIe siècle. In L'héritage des grammairiens latins, de l’Antiquité aux Lumières: Actes du colloque de Chantilly, 2–4 septembre 1987, I. Rosier (ed.), 325–339. Louvain: Peeters & Société pour l’Information Grammaticale.Google Scholar
Fournier, J.-M.
2007 Un exemple du transfert du modèle latin aux premières grammaires du français: L’analyse des temps du passé. In History of Linguistics 2002, E. Guimarães and D. L. P. de Barros (eds), 17–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, V.
2012 Contrastive Linguistics: Theories and Methods. In Dictionaries of Linguistics and Communication Science: Linguistic Theory and Methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
2010 Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies. Language 861: 663–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukenheim, L.
1932 Contributions à l’histoire de la grammaire italienne, espagnole et française à l’époque de la Renaissance. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar
Lagarde, J.-P.
1985 L’influence de Donat et de Priscien sur la description du pronom au XVIe siècle. Verbum, special issue: De la plume d’oie à l’ordinateur, études de philologie et de linguistique offertes à Hélène Naïs 263–275.Google Scholar
Lallot, J.
2013 Aorist (aóristos), Ancient Theories of. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, G. K. Giannakis (ed.), online edition. Brill. Available at https://​referenceworks​.brillonline​.com​/entries​/encyclopedia​-of​-ancient​-greek​-language​-and​-linguistics​/aorist​-aoristos​-ancient​-theories​-of​-SIM​_00000416 [last accessed 5 November 2021].
Loiseau, A.
1866 [1969] Étude historique et philologique sur Jean Pillot et sur les doctrines grammaticales du XVIe siècle. Saint-Cloud [Genève]: Madame Veuve Belin [Slatkine].Google Scholar
MacPhail, E. M.
2014 Dancing around the Well: The Circulation of Commonplaces in Renaissance Humanism. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthaios, S. and Van Rooy, R.
2021 The Greeks’ Idle Instrument: The Article from Ancient Greece to the Renaissance. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 31(1): 27–54.Google Scholar
Neumann, S.-G.
1959 Recherches sur le français des XVe et XVIe siècles et sur sa codification par les théoriciens de l’époque. Lund & Copenhague: C. W. K. Gleerup & Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Padley, G. A.
1988 Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in Vernacular Grammar II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W. K.
1983 Grammar and Rhetoric in the Renaissance. In Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric, J. J. Murphy (ed.), 303–330. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pigman III, G. W.
1980 Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance. Renaissance Quarterly 331: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H.
1993 The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengel, E.
1890 Plan einer Geschichte der französischen Grammatik besonders in Deutschland (mit Beschreibung der Institutio Pilot’s). Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 121: 257–290.Google Scholar
Streuber, A.
1923 Die griechische und lateinische Sprache und ihr Lehrverfahren im französischen Unterricht des 16.–18. Jahrhunderts. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 461: 123–168.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P.
1998 Le statut du participe dans la grammaire française du seizième siècle. In Et multum et multa: Festschrift für Peter Wunderli zum 60. Geburtstag, E. Werner, R. Liver, Y. Stork and M. Nicklaus (eds), 181–195. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
2017 Intuition, Exploration, and Assertion of the Indo-European Language Relationship. In Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics, J. Klein, B. Joseph and M. Fritz (eds), vol. 11, 138–170. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swiggers, P., Szoc, S. and Van Hal, T.
2018 Multilinguisme vertical et multilinguisme horizontal: La complexité des rapports de langues en Flandre au seizième siècle. In Villes à la croisée des langues (XVIe-XVIIe siècles): Palerme, Naples, Milan, Anvers et Hambourg, R. Béhar, M. Blanco and J. Hafner (eds), 179–203. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, R.
2020 The Vernacular through the Greek Lens: John Palsgrave’s French Grammar (1530) and His Model Theodore Gaza Revisited. Les Études classiques 881: 405–429.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H.
1973 Le temps: Le récit et le commentaire, Michèle Lacoste (transl.). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Contrastive grammar in the Renaissance