Cover not available
Article published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 22:1 (2022) ► pp.114–135

Contrastive grammar in the Renaissance

The subtle presence of Greek in Jean Pillot’s French grammar (1550/1561)

ORCID logo | KU Leuven, Belgium | University of Oslo, Norway
This paper focuses on how Jean Pillot, author of the most popular French grammar of the sixteenth century in terms of editions, took efforts to contrast his native language with Greek. His Gallicæ linguæ institutio (1550/1561), although written in Latin, contains numerous passages where Pillot subtly confronted French with Greek, surveyed in Section 2, in order to give his audience of educated German speakers a clearer view of the idiosyncrasies of French. In Section 3, I analyze why he preferred Greek to the other languages he knew in quite a number of cases, arguing that this subtle contrastive endeavor bore an indirect pedagogical and ideological load. Section 4 discusses the terminological means Pillot used to confront Greek with French, and their origins. In Section 5, I frame Pillot’s appropriation of Greek grammar in the long history of contrastive language studies, with special reference to the pivotal role of sixteenth-century linguistic analysis.
Keywords: long history of contrastive linguistics, sixteenth century, Jean Pillot, French/Greek
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.French and Greek in contrast: Pillot’s data
  • 3.Hellenizing the vernacular: A linguistic backing for imagined socio-cultural ties
  • 4.Pillot’s contrastive metalanguage
  • 5.Outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 7 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.21008.van
References (38)
References
Databases
BREPOLiS Cross Database Searchtool. Available at [URL] [last accessed 29 March 2021].
Universal Short Title Catalogue. Available at [URL] [last accessed 22 March 2021].
Primary sources
De Keyser, J. (ed.). 2015–2016. Francesco Filelfo. Collected Letters. Epistolarum Libri XLVIII. 41 vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Keil, H. (ed.). 1855–1880. Grammatici Latini. 71 vols. Lipsiae: in aedibus B. G. Teubneri.Google Scholar
Palsgrave, J. 1530. Lesclarcissement de la langue francoyse. [S.l.]: Johan Haukyns.Google Scholar
Pillot, J. 1550. Gallicæ linguæ institutio, Latino sermone conscripta. Parisiis: Ex officina Stephani Groulleau.Google Scholar
1561. Gallicæ linguæ institutio, Latino sermone conscripta. Parisiis: Apud Stephanum Grouleau.Google Scholar
Sylvius, J. 1531. In linguam Gallicam isagωge […]. Parisiis: Ex officina Roberti Stephani.Google Scholar
Valence, P. 1528. Introductions in frensshe […]. [London]: [Wynkyn de Worde]. [Facsimile 1967. Menston: Scolar Press.]Google Scholar
Secondary literature
Auroux, S. 1992. Introduction: Le processus de grammatisation et ses enjeux. In Histoire des idées linguistiques, S. Auroux (ed.), vol. 21, 11–64. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Biville, F. 2018. Multilingualism in the Roman World. Oxford Handbooks Online. Available at [URL] [last accessed 5 November 2021].
Colombat, B. (ed.). 2003a. Jean Pillot. Institution de la langue française | Gallicae linguae institutio (1561). Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
2003b. La Gallicae linguae institutio de Jean Pillot: Comment adapter le cadre grammatical latin à la description du français. In Lyon et l’illustration de la langue française, G. Defaux (ed.), 77–107. Lyon: ENS.Google Scholar
2013. L’héritage du modèle latin dans les grammaires françaises à la Renaissance. Documents pour l’histoire du français langue étrangère ou seconde 511: 11–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Considine, J. and Van Hal, T. 2010. Introduction: Classifying and Comparing Languages in Post-Renaissance Europe (1600–1800). Language & History 531: 63–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demaizière, C. 1982. La langue à la recherche de ses origines: La mode des étymologies grecques. Bulletin de l’Association d’étude sur l’humanisme, la réforme et la renaissance 151: 65–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988. Une contrainte de l’héritage latin: Le difficile classement de l’article chez les grammairiens français du XVIe siècle. In L'héritage des grammairiens latins, de l’Antiquité aux Lumières: Actes du colloque de Chantilly, 2–4 septembre 1987, I. Rosier (ed.), 325–339. Louvain: Peeters & Société pour l’Information Grammaticale.Google Scholar
Fournier, J.-M. 2007. Un exemple du transfert du modèle latin aux premières grammaires du français: L’analyse des temps du passé. In History of Linguistics 2002, E. Guimarães and D. L. P. de Barros (eds), 17–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, V. 2012. Contrastive Linguistics: Theories and Methods. In Dictionaries of Linguistics and Communication Science: Linguistic Theory and Methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2010. Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies. Language 861: 663–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukenheim, L. 1932. Contributions à l’histoire de la grammaire italienne, espagnole et française à l’époque de la Renaissance. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar
Lagarde, J.-P. 1985. L’influence de Donat et de Priscien sur la description du pronom au XVIe siècle. Verbum, special issue: De la plume d’oie à l’ordinateur, études de philologie et de linguistique offertes à Hélène Naïs 263–275.Google Scholar
Lallot, J. 2013. Aorist (aóristos), Ancient Theories of. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, G. K. Giannakis (ed.), online edition. Brill. Available at [URL] [last accessed 5 November 2021].
Loiseau, A. 1866 [1969]. Étude historique et philologique sur Jean Pillot et sur les doctrines grammaticales du XVIe siècle. Saint-Cloud [Genève]: Madame Veuve Belin [Slatkine].Google Scholar
MacPhail, E. M. 2014. Dancing around the Well: The Circulation of Commonplaces in Renaissance Humanism. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthaios, S. and Van Rooy, R. 2021. The Greeks’ Idle Instrument: The Article from Ancient Greece to the Renaissance. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 31(1): 27–54.Google Scholar
Neumann, S.-G. 1959. Recherches sur le français des XVe et XVIe siècles et sur sa codification par les théoriciens de l’époque. Lund & Copenhague: C. W. K. Gleerup & Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Padley, G. A. 1988. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in Vernacular Grammar II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W. K. 1983. Grammar and Rhetoric in the Renaissance. In Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric, J. J. Murphy (ed.), 303–330. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pigman III, G. W. 1980. Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance. Renaissance Quarterly 331: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. 1993. The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengel, E. 1890. Plan einer Geschichte der französischen Grammatik besonders in Deutschland (mit Beschreibung der Institutio Pilot’s). Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 121: 257–290.Google Scholar
Streuber, A. 1923. Die griechische und lateinische Sprache und ihr Lehrverfahren im französischen Unterricht des 16.–18. Jahrhunderts. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 461: 123–168.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. 1998. Le statut du participe dans la grammaire française du seizième siècle. In Et multum et multa: Festschrift für Peter Wunderli zum 60. Geburtstag, E. Werner, R. Liver, Y. Stork and M. Nicklaus (eds), 181–195. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
2017. Intuition, Exploration, and Assertion of the Indo-European Language Relationship. In Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics, J. Klein, B. Joseph and M. Fritz (eds), vol. 11, 138–170. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swiggers, P., Szoc, S. and Van Hal, T. 2018. Multilinguisme vertical et multilinguisme horizontal: La complexité des rapports de langues en Flandre au seizième siècle. In Villes à la croisée des langues (XVIe-XVIIe siècles): Palerme, Naples, Milan, Anvers et Hambourg, R. Béhar, M. Blanco and J. Hafner (eds), 179–203. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, R. 2020. The Vernacular through the Greek Lens: John Palsgrave’s French Grammar (1530) and His Model Theodore Gaza Revisited. Les Études classiques 881: 405–429.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H. 1973. Le temps: Le récit et le commentaire, Michèle Lacoste (transl.). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Maleux, Maxime
2023. The curious case(s) of the Hebrew article: on a conflated grammatical category and how it emerges from sixteenth-century student notes. Language & History 66:2 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Van Rooy, Raf
2023. The French aorist in sixteenth-century grammar, or how to make the best of a bad Greek concept. Language & History 66:2 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Vinogradov, Igor
2023. Pioneers of contrastive linguistics. Languages in Contrast 23:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.