Cover not available
Review published In:
Approaches to Languages in Contrast
Edited by Stig Johansson
[Languages in Contrast 3:1] 2001
► pp. 156–163
Book review

Mats Johansson. Clefts in English and Swedish. A Contrastive Study of IT-Clefts and WH-Clefts in Original Texts and Translations
University of Lund, 2002. PhD Dissertation.219 pp.

Reviewed by
| University of Minnesota, Minneapolis and NTNU, Trondheim
Published online: 6 June 2003
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.3.1.09gun
References
Gundel, J. K.
1999 “On Three Kinds of Focus.” In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds), Focus. Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 293–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002 “Information Structure and the Use of Cleft Sentences in English and Norwegian.” In Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, H. Hasselgård, S. Johansson, B. Behrens, and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 113–128. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, N.
2000 “The Referential Status of Clefts.” Language 761: 891–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S.
2001 “The German and Norwegian Correspondences to the English Construction Type that’s what .” Linguistics 391: 583–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, E. F.
1978 “A Comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in Discourse.” Language 541: 883–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar